# ComposioHQ/composio — health index 86/100 (Excellent)

> Inspection of the public repository ComposioHQ/composio by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/ComposioHQ/composio
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/ComposioHQ/composio
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/ComposioHQ/composio/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/c/ComposioHQ/composio.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-20
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.16.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 96/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 95/100 | Excellent |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 80/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 88/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 70/100 | Good |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 90/100 | Excellent |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Composio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action. |
| Homepage | https://docs.composio.dev |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 29,296 |
| Forks | 4,669 |
| Created | 2024-02-23 |
| Last push | 2026-07-20 |
| Latest release | @composio/cli@0.2.33-beta.295 |
| Commits (last year) | 3,653 |
| Bus factor | 3 |
| Topics | ai, python, agents, aiagents, function-calling, developer-tools, gpt-4, llm, llmops, typescript, javascript, js, ai-agents, mcp, remote-mcp-server, sse, agentic-ai |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | composio | 0.18.0 | 1,680,219 |

## Vitality — 96/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | met | 36 / 36 | 52/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 3653 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 0 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~0.5 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 95/100 (Excellent)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 95/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | met | 60 / 60 | 29,296 stars |
| Forks | met | 25 / 25 | 4,669 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 10.1 / 15 | 67 watchers |

### Community health — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | met | 80 / 80 | 1,680,219 downloads/month across pypi |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 80/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 74/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 36 / 54 | 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 14.9 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 34% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 75 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 24 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 83/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 44.5 / 46.8 | 95% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 29.1 / 38.2 | 2345/3083 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 9 / 15 | Found 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 70/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 23.9 / 25 | 2,125 followers of ComposioHQ |
| Track record | partial | 15.6 / 25 | 16 public repos, account ~3 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 1 package(s) on pypi |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 4 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 68 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 88/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 32 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.mjs, ruff.toml |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 16 / 20 | 15 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |

### Documentation — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://docs.composio.dev |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 17 topics |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 70/100 (Good)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 69/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 3.8 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | partial | 2 / 2.5 | 15 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 4.5 / 7.5 | Found 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 24 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 3.5 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7 |
| SAST | partial | 3.5 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7 |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 127 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 74/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1771 resolved dependencies against OSV; 340 could not be assessed (no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list). This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | partial | 20.2 / 35 | 1 affected: zod catalog: (moderate 5.3) |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | excluded | 0 / 25 | transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| No advisories left outstanding | partial | 35.3 / 40 | 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1025 days ago |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 90/100 (Excellent)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/AGENTS.md, docs/CLAUDE.md, docs/content/toolkits/faq/gemini.md, python/AGENTS.md, python/providers/AGENTS.md, ts/AGENTS.md, ts/e2e-tests/AGENTS.md, ts/packages/cli/AGENTS.md, ts/packages/cli/CLAUDE.md, ts/packages/core/AGENTS.md, ts/packages/providers/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 93/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | mise.toml, python/Makefile, python/noxfile.py |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.mjs, ruff.toml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | docs/tsconfig.json, python/composio/py.typed, python/config/mypy.ini, python/providers/anthropic/composio_anthropic/py.typed, python/providers/autogen/composio_autogen/py.typed, python/providers/claude_agent_sdk/composio_claude_agent_sdk/py.typed, python/providers/crewai/composio_crewai/py.typed, python/providers/gemini/composio_gemini/py.typed, python/providers/google/composio_google/py.typed, python/providers/google_adk/composio_google_adk/py.typed, python/providers/langchain/composio_langchain/py.typed, python/providers/langgraph/composio_langgraph/py.typed, python/providers/llamaindex/composio_llamaindex/py.typed, python/providers/openai/composio_openai/py.typed, python/providers/openai_agents/composio_openai_agents/py.typed, ts/e2e-tests/_utils/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/cloudflare/cf-workers-basic/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/cloudflare/cf-workers-files/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/cloudflare/cf-workers-tool-router-ai/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/deno/esm-basic/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/cjs-basic/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/claude-agent-sdk/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/esm-basic/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/file-roundtrip/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/json-schema-to-zod-v3/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/json-schema-to-zod-v4/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/mastra-tool-router-zod-v3/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/mastra-tool-router-zod-v4/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/openai-zod4-compat/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/tool-router-files/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/tool-router-pagination/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/typescript-mjs-import-nodenext/fixtures/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/typescript-mjs-import-nodenext/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/vercel-ai-sdk-v6/fixtures/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/vercel-ai-sdk-v6/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/vercel-ai-sdk-v7/fixtures/tsconfig.json, ts/e2e-tests/runtimes/node/vercel-ai-sdk-v7/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/anthropic/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/cloudflare-wrangler/test/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/cloudflare-wrangler/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/connected-accounts/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/error-handling-demo/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/file-handling/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/google/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/json-schema-to-zod/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/langchain/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/llamaindex/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/mastra/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/mcp/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/modifiers/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/openai/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/session-management/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/tool-router/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/toolkits/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/tools/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/triggers/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/vercel/tsconfig.json, ts/examples/versioning/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/cli-keyring/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/cli-local-tools/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/cli/test/__fixtures__/typescript-bun-project/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/cli/test/__fixtures__/typescript-pnpm-monorepo/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/cli/test/__fixtures__/typescript-project-with-composio-core/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/cli/test/__fixtures__/typescript-project/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/cli/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/core/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/experimental/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/json-schema-to-zod/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/anthropic/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/claude-agent-sdk/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/cloudflare/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/google/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/langchain/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/llamaindex/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/mastra/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/openai-agents/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/openai/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/providers/vercel/tsconfig.json, ts/packages/ts-builders/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 7 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7 |

### Code legibility for models — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.4 / 55 | 14/1298 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | docs/public/openapi.json |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Resolved dependency list truncated to 2000 of 2111 packages (counts remain complete)
- deps.dev does not index pypi:composio@0.18.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
- Advisory severity resolved for 120 of 409 advisories (lookup cap); the remainder are reported as unknown severity

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt