# INTENTIUS/chant — health index 67/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository INTENTIUS/chant by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/INTENTIUS/chant
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/INTENTIUS/chant
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/INTENTIUS/chant/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/i/INTENTIUS/chant.svg
- Inspected: 2026-08-22
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 83/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 38/100 | Weak |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 52/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 78/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 50/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 69/100 | Good |

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Classification | library, network-service, cli |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 1 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Created | 2026-02-19 |
| Last push | 2026-08-22 |
| Latest release | aws-spec-pin |
| Commits (last year) | 1,184 |
| Bus factor | 1 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @intentius/chant-lexicon-aws | 0.44.14 | 10,285 |
| npm | @intentius/chant-lexicon-fly | 0.44.14 | 9,981 |
| npm | @intentius/chant-lexicon-gcp | 0.44.14 | 10,692 |
| npm | @intentius/chant-lexicon-k3d | 0.44.14 | 3,191 |
| npm | @intentius/chant-lexicon-k3s | 0.44.14 | 1,531 |
| npm | @intentius/chant-lexicon-k8s | 0.44.14 | 13,387 |
| npm | @intentius/chant-lexicon-helm | 0.44.14 | 10,611 |

## Vitality — 83/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 79/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 15.2 / 36 | 22/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1184 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 6 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 16 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~32.8 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 0 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 38/100 (Weak)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 1 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 2 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 80/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 63.7 / 80 | 59,678 downloads/month across npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 52/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 13/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 0.1 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 4.1 / 13.5 | 3 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | not met | 0 / 10 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 70/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 32.1 / 42 | 76% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 29.1 / 30 | 847/872 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 43/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 2.2 / 25 | 1 followers of INTENTIUS |
| Track record | partial | 10.4 / 25 | 18 public repos, account ~0 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 7 package(s) on npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 4 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 153 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 78/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 84/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 9 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.js |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 70/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://intentius.io/chant |
| Repository description | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 50/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 38/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | not met | 0 / 2.5 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool is run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 128 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@intentius/chant-lexicon-aws@0.44.14 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | met | 35 / 35 | no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | met | 25 / 25 | no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| No advisories left outstanding | excluded | 0 / 40 | no advisory carries a publication date |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

## AI Readiness — 69/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 40/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 84 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 82/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | examples/fargate-lucene-efs/connectors/justfile, examples/fargate-lucene-efs/docker/justfile, examples/fargate-lucene-efs/infra/justfile, examples/fargate-lucene-efs/justfile, examples/fargate-lucene-efs/solr/justfile, examples/ray-kuberay-gke/justfile, justfile, lexicons/aws/justfile, lexicons/azure/justfile, lexicons/cedar/justfile, lexicons/docker/justfile, lexicons/fly/justfile, lexicons/forgejo/justfile, lexicons/fountain/justfile, lexicons/gcp/justfile, lexicons/github/justfile, lexicons/gitlab/justfile, lexicons/helm/justfile, lexicons/k3d/justfile, lexicons/k3s/justfile, lexicons/k8s/justfile, packages/core/src/cli/commands/__fixtures__/init-lexicon-output/justfile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.js |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | docs/tsconfig.json, editors/vscode/tsconfig.json, examples/alert-triage/tsconfig.json, examples/fly-deploy-rollback/tsconfig.json, examples/fly-durable-deploy/tsconfig.json, examples/fly-reconcile/tsconfig.json, examples/getting-started/tsconfig.json, examples/gitlab-aws-alb-api/tsconfig.json, examples/gitlab-aws-alb-infra/tsconfig.json, examples/gitlab-aws-alb-ui/tsconfig.json, examples/k8s-aks-microservice/tsconfig.json, examples/k8s-eks-microservice/tsconfig.json, examples/k8s-gke-microservice/tsconfig.json, examples/local-cloud-trio/tsconfig.json, examples/local-fly/tsconfig.json, examples/local-op-quickstart/tsconfig.json, examples/sprites-agent-task/tsconfig.json, examples/sprites-build-sandbox/tsconfig.json, examples/sprites-managed-agent-worker/tsconfig.json, examples/supply-chain/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/core-concepts/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/docs-snippets/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/fargate-alb/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-api/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-dynamodb/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-eventbridge/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-function/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-s3/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-scheduled/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-sns/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lambda-sqs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/lifecycle-reconcile-aws/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/multi-service-alb/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/rds-postgres/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/shared-alb-api/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/shared-alb-ui/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/shared-alb/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/stack-outputs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/examples/vpc/tsconfig.json, lexicons/aws/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/aks-cluster/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/basic-storage/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/container-instance/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/cosmos-db/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/function-app/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/key-vault/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/multi-resource/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/private-endpoint/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/redis-cache/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/service-bus/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/sql-database/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/vnet-vms/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/examples/web-app/tsconfig.json, lexicons/azure/tsconfig.json, lexicons/cedar/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/cedar/tsconfig.json, lexicons/docker/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/docker/tsconfig.json, lexicons/fly/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/fly/examples/getting-started/tsconfig.json, lexicons/fly/tsconfig.json, lexicons/forgejo/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/forgejo/tsconfig.json, lexicons/fountain/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/fountain/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/basic-bucket/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/cloud-function/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/cloud-run/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/cloud-sql/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/cloud-storage-lifecycle/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/gke-cluster/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/pubsub/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/examples/vpc-network/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gcp/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/deploy-pages/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/docker-build/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/docs-snippets/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/getting-started/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/matrix-test/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/node-ci/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/release-please/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/examples/reusable-workflow/tsconfig.json, lexicons/github/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/docker-build/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/docs-snippets/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/getting-started/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/monorepo-pipeline/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/multi-stage-deploy/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/node-pipeline/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/python-pipeline/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/examples/review-app/tsconfig.json, lexicons/gitlab/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/composites-basic/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/composites-infrastructure/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/composites-production/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/cron-job/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/microservice-chart/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/multi-container/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/stateful-service/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/examples/web-app-with-ingress/tsconfig.json, lexicons/helm/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k3d/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k3d/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k3s/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k3s/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/basic-deployment/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/batch-workers/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/configmap-secret/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/cronjob-cleanup/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/ingress-tls/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/layered-config/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/namespace-rbac/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/org-policy/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/statefulset/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/examples/web-platform/tsconfig.json, lexicons/k8s/tsconfig.json, lexicons/temporal/docs/tsconfig.json, lexicons/temporal/tsconfig.json, packages/core/src/cli/commands/__fixtures__/init-lexicon-output/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/core/src/cli/commands/__fixtures__/init-lexicon-output/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/k8s-client/tsconfig.json, packages/test-utils/tsconfig.json, test/leftness/chant-app/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | met | 10 / 10 | 31 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.9 / 55 | 6/3313 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Could not fetch crates package 'chant-zed' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt