# L-F-Z/cri-t — health index 41/100 (Weak)

> Inspection of the public repository L-F-Z/cri-t by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/L-F-Z/cri-t
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/L-F-Z/cri-t
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/L-F-Z/cri-t/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/l/L-F-Z/cri-t.svg
- Inspected: 2026-09-18
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 19/100 | Critical |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 18/100 | Critical |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 50/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 73/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 53/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 71/100 | Good |

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | TaskC-based implementation of Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface |
| Classification | cli, library |
| Homepage | https://cri-o.io |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 6 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Created | 2025-04-24 |
| Last push | 2025-07-27 |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 0 |
| Bus factor | 3 |
| Fork | yes |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/L-F-Z/cri-t | v0.1.0 | — |

## Vitality — 19/100 (Critical)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | not met | 0 / 36 | last push 417 days ago |
| Commit cadence | not met | 0 / 36 | 0/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | not met | 0 / 18 | 0 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | not met | 0 / 10 | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |

### Release discipline — 47/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 1 releases published |
| Release recency | partial | 7.2 / 36 | latest release 475 days ago |
| Release cadence | partial | 12.6 / 27 | cadence unknown (single release) |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | no human commit for 475 days, with nothing left unanswered; held at dormant by nothing open to answer |

## Community & Adoption — 18/100 (Critical)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 11/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 11.3 / 60 | 6 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 25/100 (At Risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | not met | 0 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 50/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 36 / 54 | 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 17.2 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 24% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 97 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 43 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 42 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 30 | no decided pull requests or no data |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 55/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 11.9 / 25 | 44 followers of L-F-Z |
| Track record | partial | 21.9 / 25 | 22 public repos, account ~10 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 63/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 1 package(s) on go |
| Publish recency | partial | 14 / 35 | latest publish 475 days ago |
| Version history | partial | 4 / 20 | 1 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 73/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 88/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 10 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .flake8, .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | not met | 0 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://cri-o.io |
| Repository description | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 53/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 53/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 43 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 4 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool detected: CodeQL |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 81 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 71/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 19/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | partial | 19 / 40 | 21 of 59 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 88/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | Makefile, pinns/Makefile, vendor/github.com/checkpoint-restore/go-criu/v7/Makefile, vendor/github.com/containerd/fifo/Makefile, vendor/github.com/containerd/otelttrpc/Makefile, vendor/github.com/containerd/ttrpc/Makefile, vendor/github.com/containers/kubensmnt/Makefile, vendor/github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/felixge/httpsnoop/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-git/gcfg/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-git/go-git/v5/Makefile, vendor/github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v3/Taskfile.yml, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/gogoproto/Makefile, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto/Makefile, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/protoc-gen-gogo/descriptor/Makefile, vendor/github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware/makefile, vendor/github.com/kevinburke/ssh_config/Makefile, vendor/github.com/munnerz/goautoneg/Makefile, vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pjbgf/sha1cd/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/github.com/prometheus/procfs/Makefile, vendor/github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/Makefile, vendor/github.com/tetratelabs/wazero/Makefile, vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/v2/Makefile, vendor/github.com/vishvananda/netlink/Makefile, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/automaxprocs/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile, vendor/sigs.k8s.io/json/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .flake8, .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | Go (statically typed) |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | met | 8 / 8 | 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 8 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Go (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.7 / 55 | 2/337 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | vendor/github.com/checkpoint-restore/go-criu/v7/rpc/rpc.proto, vendor/github.com/checkpoint-restore/go-criu/v7/stats/stats.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/cgroups/stats/v1/metrics.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/cgroups/v2/stats/metrics.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/runtime/task/v2/shim.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/services/ttrpc/events/v1/events.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/descriptor.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/event.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/fieldpath.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/introspection.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/metrics.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/mount.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/platform.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/sandbox.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/api/types/task/task.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/containerd/pkg/runtimeoptions/v1/api.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/nri/pkg/api/api.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/otelttrpc/internal/test.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/ttrpc/request.proto, vendor/github.com/containerd/ttrpc/test.proto, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/gogoproto/gogo.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/extensions/extension.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv2/OpenAPIv2.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/annotations.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apidiscovery/v2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apidiscovery/v2beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apiserverinternal/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apps/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apps/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apps/v1beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authentication/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authentication/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authentication/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authorization/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authorization/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v2beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v2beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/batch/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/batch/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/certificates/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/certificates/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/certificates/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/coordination/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/coordination/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/coordination/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/core/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/discovery/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/discovery/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/events/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/events/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/extensions/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1beta3/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/networking/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/networking/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/networking/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/node/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/node/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/node/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/rbac/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/rbac/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/rbac/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/resource/v1alpha3/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/scheduling/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/scheduling/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/scheduling/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storage/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storage/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storage/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storagemigration/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/runtime/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/runtime/schema/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/intstr/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/cri-api/pkg/apis/runtime/v1/api.proto |
| MCP server | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Community profile unavailable
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt