# Quatrain/Core — health index 59/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository Quatrain/Core by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/Quatrain/Core
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/Quatrain/Core
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/Quatrain/Core/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/q/Quatrain/Core.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-25
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.27.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 74/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 37/100 | At risk |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 56/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 72/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 51/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 68/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Business logic outlasts infrastructure |
| Homepage | http://core.quatrain.com/ |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| Stars | 1 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Created | 2022-07-26 |
| Last push | 2026-07-24 |
| Latest release | v1.1.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 516 |
| Bus factor | 1 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @quatrain/ai | 1.1.4 | 255 |
| npm | @quatrain/api | 1.1.7 | 384 |
| npm | @quatrain/app | 1.1.22 | 298 |
| npm | @quatrain/auth | 1.2.10 | 751 |
| npm | @quatrain/ai-gemini | 1.1.4 | 312 |
| npm | @quatrain/auth-oidc | 1.1.5 | 53 |
| npm | @quatrain/api-client | 1.1.7 | 83 |
| npm | @quatrain/api-server | 1.1.11 | 261 |

## Vitality — 74/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 84/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 20.1 / 36 | 29/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 516 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 60/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 20 releases published |
| Release recency | partial | 7.2 / 36 | latest release 577 days ago |
| Release cadence | partial | 19.8 / 27 | a release every ~62.1 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 0 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 37/100 (At risk)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 1 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 1 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 2 watchers |

### Community health — 64/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 56/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 45.1 / 80 | 2,397 downloads/month across npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 56/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 26/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 1.8 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 92% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 5.4 / 13.5 | 4 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 59/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 46.8 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | partial | 31.6 / 38.2 | 19/23 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 52/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 2.2 / 25 | 1 followers of Quatrain |
| Track record | partial | 20.1 / 25 | 12 public repos, account ~14 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 8 package(s) on npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 3 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 38 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 72/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 60/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 4 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | http://core.quatrain.com/ |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 51/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 39/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 2.2 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | no SAST tool detected |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 83 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@quatrain/ai@1.1.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 15 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | met | 35 / 35 | no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | met | 25 / 25 | no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| No advisories left outstanding | excluded | 0 / 40 | no advisory carries a publication date |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 68/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .agents/AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, guidelines/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 43/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | packages/ai-gemini/tsconfig.json, packages/ai/tsconfig.json, packages/api-client/tsconfig.json, packages/api-server-astro/tsconfig.json, packages/api-server-express/tsconfig.json, packages/api-server/tsconfig.json, packages/api-xmlrpc/tsconfig.json, packages/api/tsconfig.json, packages/app/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-firebase/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-github/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-http-basic/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-oidc/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-pocketbase/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-supabase/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/backend-firestore/tsconfig.json, packages/backend-migrations/tsconfig.json, packages/backend-postgres/tsconfig.json, packages/backend-restapi-recipes/tsconfig.json, packages/backend-restapi/tsconfig.json, packages/backend-sqlite/tsconfig.json, packages/backend/tsconfig.json, packages/cache-redis/tsconfig.json, packages/cache/tsconfig.json, packages/chat/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/cloudwrapper-firebase/tsconfig.json, packages/cloudwrapper-supabase/tsconfig.json, packages/cloudwrapper/tsconfig.json, packages/code-github/tsconfig.json, packages/code/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/gateway-upstream-express/tsconfig.json, packages/git-client/tsconfig.json, packages/http/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n-en/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n-es/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n-fr/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n/tsconfig.json, packages/ingestion-audio/tsconfig.json, packages/ingestion-ocr/tsconfig.json, packages/ingestion-video/tsconfig.json, packages/ingestion-web/tsconfig.json, packages/ingestion/tsconfig.json, packages/log/tsconfig.json, packages/messaging-firebase/tsconfig.json, packages/messaging/tsconfig.json, packages/okf/tsconfig.json, packages/queue-amqp/tsconfig.json, packages/queue-aws/tsconfig.json, packages/queue-gcp/tsconfig.json, packages/queue-sqlite/tsconfig.json, packages/queue/tsconfig.json, packages/searchengine-qmd/tsconfig.json, packages/searchengine/tsconfig.json, packages/skills/tsconfig.json, packages/state-machine/tsconfig.json, packages/storage-firebase/tsconfig.json, packages/storage-git/tsconfig.json, packages/storage-local/tsconfig.json, packages/storage-s3/tsconfig.json, packages/storage-supabase/tsconfig.json, packages/storage/tsconfig.json, packages/studio/tsconfig.json, packages/testing/tsconfig.json, packages/types/tsconfig.json, packages/worker/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.9 / 55 | 1/423 source files over 60KB |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt