# RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-samples — health index 81/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-samples by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-samples
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-samples
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-samples/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/r/RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-samples.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-27
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.27.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 92/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 84/100 | Good |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 83/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 80/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 62/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 56/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Plugins, codelabs, and examples related to the Blockly library. |
| Homepage | https://raspberrypifoundation.github.io/blockly-samples/ |
| Primary language | JavaScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 977 |
| Forks | 662 |
| Created | 2019-08-01 |
| Last push | 2026-07-24 |
| Latest release | v13.1.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 120 |
| Bus factor | 3 |
| Topics | blockly |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | blockly-samples | 0.0.1-security | 15 |
| npm | @blockly/dev-tools | 13.1.0 | 9,571 |
| npm | @blockly/block-test | 13.1.0 | 10,037 |
| npm | @blockly/create-package | 13.1.0 | 420 |
| npm | @blockly/field-date | 13.1.0 | 19,837 |
| npm | @blockly/dev-scripts | 13.1.0 | 1,149 |
| npm | @blockly/field-angle | 13.1.0 | 2,364 |
| npm | @blockly/field-colour | 13.1.0 | 20,424 |
| npm | @blockly/field-slider | 13.1.0 | 3,396 |

## Vitality — 92/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 2 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 21.5 / 36 | 31/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 120 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 26 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~9.1 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 13 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 84/100 (Good)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 79/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 48.5 / 60 | 977 stars |
| Forks | partial | 23.5 / 25 | 662 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 7.2 / 15 | 21 watchers |

### Community health — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 81/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 64.4 / 80 | 67,198 downloads/month across npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 83/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 78/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 36 / 54 | 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 18.3 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 19% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 98 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 38.3 / 46.8 | 82% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 33.6 / 38.2 | 1754/1998 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 13.5 / 15 | Found 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 74/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 18.7 / 25 | 403 followers of RaspberryPiFoundation |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 86 public repos, account ~13 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 8 package(s) on npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 26 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 128 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 80/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 84/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 4 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.js |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 75/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://raspberrypifoundation.github.io/blockly-samples/ |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 1 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 62/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 57/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 6.8 / 7.5 | Found 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 1.5 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 112 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 80/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1635 resolved dependencies against OSV; 64 could not be assessed (no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list). This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | partial | 20.2 / 35 | 1 affected: webpack-dev-server 5.2.5 (moderate 5.3) |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | excluded | 0 / 25 | transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| No advisories left outstanding | met | 40 / 40 | no advisory has been public longer than 90 days |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

1 resolved dependency(ies) are reported as malicious packages, but the registry no longer serves the resolved version, so nothing installable remains. Reported for the record and not scored.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | 1 reported as malicious, but the registry no longer serves the resolved version — nothing installable remains |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 56/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 80 of 80 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 65/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.js |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | examples/developer-tools/tsconfig.json, examples/sample-app-ts/tsconfig.json, plugins/block-dynamic-connection/tsconfig.json, plugins/block-shareable-procedures/tsconfig.json, plugins/content-highlight/tsconfig.json, plugins/continuous-toolbox/tsconfig.json, plugins/cross-tab-copy-paste/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-block/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-field/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-plugin/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-theme/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-angle/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-bitmap/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-colour-hsv-sliders/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-colour/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-date/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-dependent-dropdown/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-grid-dropdown/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-multilineinput/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-slider/tsconfig.json, plugins/jsconfig.json, plugins/scroll-options/tsconfig.json, plugins/shadow-block-converter/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-dark/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-deuteranopia/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-hackermode/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-highcontrast/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-modern/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-tritanopia/tsconfig.json, plugins/toolbox-search/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-backpack/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-minimap/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-search/tsconfig.json, plugins/zoom-to-fit/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | met | 8 / 8 | 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 3 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3 |

### Code legibility for models — 81/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | partial | 27 / 45 | JavaScript with type-check config (examples/developer-tools/tsconfig.json, examples/sample-app-ts/tsconfig.json, plugins/block-dynamic-connection/tsconfig.json, plugins/block-shareable-procedures/tsconfig.json, plugins/content-highlight/tsconfig.json, plugins/continuous-toolbox/tsconfig.json, plugins/cross-tab-copy-paste/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-block/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-field/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-plugin/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/dev-create/templates/typescript-theme/template/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-angle/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-bitmap/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-colour-hsv-sliders/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-colour/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-date/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-dependent-dropdown/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-grid-dropdown/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-multilineinput/tsconfig.json, plugins/field-slider/tsconfig.json, plugins/jsconfig.json, plugins/scroll-options/tsconfig.json, plugins/shadow-block-converter/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-dark/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-deuteranopia/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-hackermode/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-highcontrast/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-modern/tsconfig.json, plugins/theme-tritanopia/tsconfig.json, plugins/toolbox-search/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-backpack/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-minimap/tsconfig.json, plugins/workspace-search/tsconfig.json, plugins/zoom-to-fit/tsconfig.json) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.1 / 55 | 6/380 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- npm package 'blockly-samples' points at a different repository (npm/security-holder); excluded from ecosystem scoring

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt