# aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team — health index 78/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/report
- Badge: https://inspect.software/badge/v1/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team.svg
- Inspected: 2026-10-18
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 93/100 | Exceptional |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 63/100 | Moderate |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 50/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 88/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 37/100 | Weak |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 74/100 | Good |

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | An installable, cross-framework AI organization: C-suite agents, expert subagents, curated skills, independent review, and one-command setup across 18 AI client/runtime adapters. |
| Classification | cli, library |
| Homepage | https://www.npmjs.com/package/agi-super-team |
| Primary language | Python |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 108 |
| Forks | 24 |
| Created | 2026-01-06 |
| Last push | 2026-10-14 |
| Latest release | v1.7.1 |
| Commits (last year) | 471 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | agent-orchestration, developer-tools, agent-skills, claude-code, ai-agent-framework, ai-agents, c-suite, hermes-agent, multi-agent-systems, npm-package, openai-codex, openclaw |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | agi-super-team | 1.7.1 | 1,346 |

## Vitality — 93/100 (Exceptional)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 89/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 4 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 24.9 / 36 | 36/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 471 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 4 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 28 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~31.7 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 4 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 63/100 (Moderate)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 44/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 32.9 / 60 | 108 stars |
| Forks | partial | 11.3 / 25 | 24 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 52/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 41.7 / 80 | 1,346 downloads/month across npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 50/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 15/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 0.2 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 99% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 5.4 / 13.5 | 4 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | not met | 0 / 10 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 58/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 21 / 42 | 50% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 29.1 / 30 | 32/33 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 44/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 8.2 / 25 | 13 followers of aAAaqwq |
| Track record | partial | 17.4 / 25 | 46 public repos, account ~2 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 1 package(s) on npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 28 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 6 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 88/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 80/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 5 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 16 / 20 | 4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |

### Documentation — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://www.npmjs.com/package/agi-super-team |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 12 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 37/100 (Weak)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 37/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | partial | 2 / 2.5 | 4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | not met | 0 / 2.5 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 235 existing vulnerabilities detected |

## AI Readiness — 74/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, agents/cco/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/ai-citation-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/bilibili-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/content-illustration-planner/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/douyin-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/growth-hacker/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/instagram-curator/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/knowledge-commerce-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/prompt-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/reddit-community-operator/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/seo-specialist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/short-video-editing-coach/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/twitter-engager/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/video-optimization-specialist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/wechat-official-account-manager/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/wechat-operator/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/weixin-channels-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/xiaohongshu-operator/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/xiaohongshu-specialist/AGENTS.md, agents/cco/subagents/zhihu-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cdo/AGENTS.md, agents/cdo/subagents/ai-data-remediation-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cdo/subagents/data-consolidator/AGENTS.md, agents/cdo/subagents/email-intelligence-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cdo/subagents/identity-graph-operator/AGENTS.md, agents/cdo/subagents/sales-data-extractor/AGENTS.md, agents/ceo/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/bookkeeper-controller/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/financial-analyst/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/financial-forecaster/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/fpa-analyst/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/fraud-detector/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/invoice-manager/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/pricing-analyst/AGENTS.md, agents/cfo/subagents/tax-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/clo/AGENTS.md, agents/clo/subagents/ai-governance-policy-specialist/AGENTS.md, agents/clo/subagents/contract-reviewer/AGENTS.md, agents/clo/subagents/data-privacy-officer/AGENTS.md, agents/clo/subagents/healthcare-marketing-compliance/AGENTS.md, agents/clo/subagents/legal-document-reviewer/AGENTS.md, agents/clo/subagents/legal-policy-writer/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/subagents/brand-guardian/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/subagents/china-market-localization-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/subagents/email-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/subagents/paid-social-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/subagents/ppc-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/subagents/pr-communications-manager/AGENTS.md, agents/cmo/subagents/tracking-attribution-specialist/AGENTS.md, agents/coo/AGENTS.md, agents/coo/subagents/change-management-consultant/AGENTS.md, agents/coo/subagents/meeting-notes-specialist/AGENTS.md, agents/coo/subagents/operations-manager/AGENTS.md, agents/coo/subagents/project-shepherd/AGENTS.md, agents/cpo/AGENTS.md, agents/cpo/subagents/ui-designer/AGENTS.md, agents/cpo/subagents/ux-architect/AGENTS.md, agents/cpo/subagents/ux-researcher/AGENTS.md, agents/cqo/AGENTS.md, agents/cqo/subagents/experiment-tracker/AGENTS.md, agents/cqo/subagents/investment-researcher/AGENTS.md, agents/cqo/subagents/model-qa-specialist/AGENTS.md, agents/cqo/subagents/spatial-data-scientist/AGENTS.md, agents/cro/AGENTS.md, agents/cro/subagents/evidence-collector/AGENTS.md, agents/cro/subagents/feedback-analyst/AGENTS.md, agents/cro/subagents/news-intelligence-officer/AGENTS.md, agents/cro/subagents/search-query-analyst/AGENTS.md, agents/cro/subagents/trend-researcher/AGENTS.md, agents/cro/subagents/x-twitter-intelligence-analyst/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/account-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/customer-success-manager/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/deal-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/discovery-coach/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/outbound-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/pipeline-analyst/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/proposal-strategist/AGENTS.md, agents/cso/subagents/sales-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/ai-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/autonomous-optimization-architect/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/backend-architect/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/data-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/devops-automator/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/embedded-firmware-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/embedded-linux-driver-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/fpga-digital-design-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/frontend-developer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/incident-response-commander/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/iot-solution-architect/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/mechanical-design-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/mobile-app-builder/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/network-engineer-china/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/pc-host-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/rapid-prototyper/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/security-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/senior-developer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/solidity-smart-contract-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/technical-writer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/threat-detection-engineer/AGENTS.md, agents/cto/subagents/wechat-mini-program-developer/AGENTS.md, agents/governor/AGENTS.md, agents/pe/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-codex/payload/global/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cco/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cdo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/ceo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cfo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/clo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cmo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/coo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cpo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cqo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cro/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cso/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/cto/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/governor/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/.agent-presets/ast-team/agents/pe/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-dsh/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cco/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cdo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-ceo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cfo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-clo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cmo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-coo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cpo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cqo/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cro/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cso/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-cto/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-governor/AGENTS.md, plugins/agi-super-team-openclaw/agency-agents/agi-super-team/ast-pe/AGENTS.md, skills/aigc-director/CLAUDE.md, skills/author-agent-suite/assets/starter-kit/AGENT.md, skills/author-agent-suite/assets/starter-kit/AGENTS.md, skills/composio-sdk/AGENTS.md, skills/env-setup/config/CLAUDE.md, skills/react-best-practices/AGENTS.md, skills/redbook/CLAUDE.md, skills/synthetic-market-research/CLAUDE.md, skills/tg-channel-reader/CLAUDE.md, skills/vitest/AGENTS.md, skills/xiaomo-assistant-template/templates/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 97 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 54/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | skills/aigc-director/aigc-claw/frontend/tsconfig.json, skills/auto-respawn/tsconfig.json, skills/env-setup/config/servers/scripts/tsconfig.json, skills/env-setup/config/servers/tsconfig.json, skills/redbook/tsconfig.json, skills/sp-remembering-conversations/tool/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 81/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | partial | 27 / 45 | Python with type-check config (skills/aigc-director/aigc-claw/frontend/tsconfig.json, skills/auto-respawn/tsconfig.json, skills/env-setup/config/servers/scripts/tsconfig.json, skills/env-setup/config/servers/tsconfig.json, skills/redbook/tsconfig.json, skills/sp-remembering-conversations/tool/tsconfig.json) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.3 / 55 | 11/912 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | excluded | 0 / 40 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | cookbook, examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt