# agentuity/sdk — health index 66/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository agentuity/sdk by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 66 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/agentuity/sdk
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/agentuity/sdk
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/agentuity/sdk/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/a/agentuity/sdk.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-17
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.12.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 89/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 31/100 | At risk |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 59/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 86/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 57/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 74/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | The Agentuity Platform (SDK, tools and runtime) |
| Homepage | https://agentuity.com |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| Stars | 18 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Created | 2025-12-09 |
| Last push | 2026-07-13 |
| Latest release | v3.1.9 |
| Commits (last year) | 1,446 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | agentic-ai, agents, agentuity |

## Vitality — 89/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 89/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 3 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 24.9 / 36 | 36/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1446 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 9 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~1.6 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 31/100 (At risk)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 20/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 20 / 60 | 18 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 2 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 2 watchers |

### Community health — 44/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 59/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 39/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 6.8 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 70% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 10 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 83/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 45.1 / 46.8 | 96% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 36 / 38.2 | 1075/1141 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 1.5 / 15 | Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 58/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 12.4 / 25 | 52 followers of agentuity |
| Track record | partial | 15.4 / 25 | 50 public repos, account ~1 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 86/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 84/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 14 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | biome.json |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://agentuity.com |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 3 topics |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 57/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 57/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 2.2 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 0.8 / 7.5 | Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 25 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 4.5 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool is run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | partial | 5.2 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 33 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 74/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, docs/.agents/agentuity/sdk/agent/AGENTS.md, docs/.agents/agentuity/sdk/api/AGENTS.md, docs/.agents/agentuity/sdk/web/AGENTS.md, docs/AGENTS.md, docs/src/agent/AGENTS.md, docs/src/api/AGENTS.md, docs/src/assistant/AGENTS.md, docs/src/generated/AGENTS.md, docs/src/run/AGENTS.md, docs/src/web/AGENTS.md, docs/src/web/content/AGENTS.md, packages/claude-code/AGENTS.md, packages/cli/AGENTS.md, packages/coder/AGENTS.md, packages/core/AGENTS.md, packages/db/AGENTS.md, packages/drizzle/AGENTS.md, packages/email/AGENTS.md, packages/keyvalue/AGENTS.md, packages/opencode/AGENTS.md, packages/postgres/AGENTS.md, packages/queue/AGENTS.md, packages/sandbox/AGENTS.md, packages/schedule/AGENTS.md, packages/schema/AGENTS.md, packages/server/AGENTS.md, packages/storage/AGENTS.md, packages/stream/AGENTS.md, packages/task/AGENTS.md, packages/test-utils/AGENTS.md, packages/vector/AGENTS.md, packages/webhook/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 77/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | biome.json |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | docs/tsconfig.json, packages/adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/aigateway/tsconfig.json, packages/analytics/tsconfig.json, packages/api/tsconfig.json, packages/claude-code/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/src/cmd/project/templates/hono/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/client/tsconfig.json, packages/coder-tui/tsconfig.json, packages/coder/tsconfig.json, packages/config/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/create-agentuity/tsconfig.json, packages/db/tsconfig.json, packages/drizzle/tsconfig.json, packages/email/tsconfig.json, packages/genesis/tsconfig.json, packages/hono/tsconfig.json, packages/keyvalue/tsconfig.json, packages/migrate/tsconfig.json, packages/opencode/tsconfig.json, packages/pi/tsconfig.json, packages/postgres/tsconfig.json, packages/queue/tsconfig.json, packages/runtime/tsconfig.json, packages/sandbox/tsconfig.json, packages/schedule/tsconfig.json, packages/schema/tsconfig.json, packages/server/tsconfig.json, packages/storage/tsconfig.json, packages/stream/tsconfig.json, packages/task/tsconfig.json, packages/telemetry/tsconfig.json, packages/test-utils/tsconfig.json, packages/vector/tsconfig.json, packages/vite/tsconfig.json, packages/vscode/tsconfig.json, packages/webhook/tsconfig.json, scripts/tsconfig.json, tests/frameworks/nextjs-app/tsconfig.json, tests/frameworks/svelte-web/tsconfig.json, tests/frameworks/tanstack-start/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/e2e-web/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/oauth/tsconfig.json, tests/integration/standalone-backend/tsconfig.json, tests/services/db/tsconfig.json, tests/services/email/tsconfig.json, tests/services/keyvalue/tsconfig.json, tests/services/queue/tsconfig.json, tests/services/sandbox/tsconfig.json, tests/services/schedule/tsconfig.json, tests/services/storage/tsconfig.json, tests/services/task/tsconfig.json, tests/services/vector/tsconfig.json, tests/services/webhook/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 9 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.8 / 55 | 7/1602 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | cookbook, examples |

## Collection warnings

- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt