# anolilab/lunora — health index 65/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository anolilab/lunora by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/anolilab/lunora
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/anolilab/lunora
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/anolilab/lunora/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/a/anolilab/lunora.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-14
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.9.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 74/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 62/100 | Moderate |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 46/100 | At risk |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 84/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 61/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 81/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Type-safe, real-time backend framework on your own Cloudflare account — Workers, Durable Objects, D1, R2, Queues. Convex-style DX, Vite-first. |
| Homepage | https://lunora.sh |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| Stars | 171 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Created | 2026-05-29 |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 |
| Latest release | @lunora/replica@1.0.0-alpha.2 |
| Commits (last year) | 1,435 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | baas, backend, cloudflare, cloudflare-workers, convex, d1, durable-objects, edge, framework, full-stack, r2, realtime, serverless, sqlite, type-safe, typescript, vite, websockets |

## Vitality — 74/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 57/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 2.8 / 36 | 4/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1435 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | not met | 0 / 10 | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 0 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~0.1 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 62/100 (Moderate)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 41/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 36.2 / 60 | 171 stars |
| Forks | partial | 5 / 25 | 5 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 46/100 (At risk)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 27/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 3.8 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 83% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 4.1 / 13.5 | 3 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 59/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 28.1 / 46.8 | 60% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 31.3 / 38.2 | 112/137 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 56/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 3.4 / 25 | 2 followers of anolilab |
| Track record | partial | 22.2 / 25 | 24 public repos, account ~11 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 84/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 18 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.js |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 75/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://lunora.sh |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 18 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 61/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 61/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 2.2 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | not met | 0 / 7.5 | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | met | 5 / 5 | all dependencies are pinned |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool is run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | partial | 6.8 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 13 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 81/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .agents/skills/composition-patterns/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/react-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/AGENTS.md, .deepsec/AGENTS.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, apps/docs/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 78/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.js |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | .vis/templates/tsconfig.json, apps/docs/tsconfig.json, apps/playground/tsconfig.json, apps/studio/tsconfig.json, examples/auth-playground/tsconfig.json, examples/blog/tsconfig.json, examples/expo/tsconfig.json, examples/offline-rejections/tsconfig.json, examples/payment-demo/tsconfig.json, examples/realtime-cursors/tsconfig.json, examples/todo-app/tsconfig.json, packages/advisor/tsconfig.json, packages/agent/tsconfig.json, packages/ai/tsconfig.json, packages/angular/tsconfig.json, packages/astro/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/bindings/tsconfig.json, packages/browser/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/client/tsconfig.json, packages/cloudflare-access/tsconfig.json, packages/codegen/tsconfig.json, packages/config/tsconfig.json, packages/container/tsconfig.json, packages/d1/tsconfig.json, packages/db/tsconfig.json, packages/dispatch/tsconfig.json, packages/do/tsconfig.json, packages/errors/tsconfig.json, packages/fingerprint/tsconfig.json, packages/flags/tsconfig.json, packages/hyperdrive/tsconfig.json, packages/lunora/tsconfig.json, packages/mail/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/nuxt/tsconfig.json, packages/payment/tsconfig.json, packages/queue/tsconfig.json, packages/ratelimit/tsconfig.json, packages/react-native/tsconfig.json, packages/react/tsconfig.json, packages/replica/tsconfig.json, packages/runtime/tsconfig.json, packages/scheduler/tsconfig.json, packages/seed/tsconfig.json, packages/server/tsconfig.json, packages/solid/tsconfig.json, packages/sql-store/tsconfig.json, packages/storage/tsconfig.json, packages/studio/tsconfig.json, packages/svelte/tsconfig.json, packages/testing/tsconfig.json, packages/values/tsconfig.json, packages/vite/tsconfig.json, packages/vue/tsconfig.json, packages/workflow/tsconfig.json, packages/x402/tsconfig.json, registry/tsconfig.json, templates/analog/tsconfig.json, templates/astro/tsconfig.json, templates/expo/tsconfig.json, templates/nuxt/tsconfig.json, templates/react-router/tsconfig.json, templates/standalone/tsconfig.json, templates/sveltekit/tsconfig.json, templates/tanstack-start-react/tsconfig.json, templates/tanstack-start-solid/tsconfig.json, tests/e2e/tsconfig.json, tests/vis-templates/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | devcontainer, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | met | 10 / 10 | all dependencies are pinned |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.7 / 55 | 18/2862 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | examples/auth-playground/lunora/_generated/openapi.json, examples/blog/lunora/_generated/openapi.json, examples/expo/lunora/_generated/openapi.json, examples/offline-rejections/lunora/_generated/openapi.json, examples/payment-demo/lunora/_generated/openapi.json, examples/realtime-cursors/lunora/_generated/openapi.json, examples/todo-app/lunora/_generated/openapi.json, packages/codegen/__tests__/fixtures/simple/expected/_generated/openapi.json |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt