# anomalyco/opencode — health index 78/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository anomalyco/opencode by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/anomalyco/opencode
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/anomalyco/opencode/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/a/anomalyco/opencode.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-21
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.23.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 96/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 92/100 | Excellent |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 80/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 76/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 35/100 | At risk |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 79/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | The open source coding agent. |
| Homepage | https://opencode.ai |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 188,230 |
| Forks | 23,699 |
| Created | 2025-04-30 |
| Last push | 2026-07-21 |
| Latest release | pr-37967-screenshots-final |
| Commits (last year) | 13,522 |
| Bus factor | 4 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @opencode-ai/cli | 1.18.4 | 393,561 |
| npm | @opencode-ai/plugin | 1.18.4 | 38,727,974 |

## Vitality — 96/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | met | 36 / 36 | 52/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 13522 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 0 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~0.8 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 0 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 92/100 (Excellent)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | met | 60 / 60 | 188,230 stars |
| Forks | met | 25 / 25 | 23,699 forks |
| Watchers | met | 15 / 15 | 726 watchers |

### Community health — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | met | 80 / 80 | 39,121,535 downloads/month across npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 80/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 43.2 / 54 | 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 18.1 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 20% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 98 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 38.7 / 46.8 | 83% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 15.7 / 38.2 | 6207/15077 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 6 / 15 | Found 8/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | met | 25 / 25 | 5,416 followers of anomalyco |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 71 public repos, account ~6 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 2 package(s) on npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 1 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 9873 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 76/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 26 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.mjs |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 55/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://opencode.ai |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 35/100 (At risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 37/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Vulnerabilities. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 0.8 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 3 / 7.5 | Found 8/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 26 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | not met | 0 / 10 | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 2.5 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: vulnerabilitiesClient.ListUnfixedVulnerabilities: osvscanner.DoScan: client error: status="400 Bad Request" body={"code":3,"message":"error in query at index 876: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = invalid hash"} |

### Dependency advisories — 26/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 275 resolved dependencies against OSV; 34 could not be assessed (no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list). This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | partial | 4.6 / 35 | 11 affected: cross-spawn catalog: (high 7.5), drizzle-orm catalog: (high 7.5), effect catalog: (high 7.4), +8 more |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | excluded | 0 / 25 | transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| No advisories left outstanding | partial | 14.9 / 40 | 10 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 3191 days ago |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 79/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, packages/app/AGENTS.md, packages/app/e2e/performance/AGENTS.md, packages/codemode/AGENTS.md, packages/core/src/tool/AGENTS.md, packages/desktop/AGENTS.md, packages/effect-drizzle-sqlite/AGENTS.md, packages/llm/AGENTS.md, packages/opencode/AGENTS.md, packages/opencode/src/server/routes/instance/httpapi/AGENTS.md, packages/opencode/src/session/llm/AGENTS.md, packages/opencode/test/AGENTS.md, packages/opencode/test/server/AGENTS.md, packages/schema/AGENTS.md, packages/stats/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 50 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 59/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.mjs |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | github/tsconfig.json, packages/app/e2e/tsconfig.json, packages/app/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/client/tsconfig.json, packages/codemode/tsconfig.json, packages/console/app/tsconfig.json, packages/console/core/tsconfig.json, packages/console/function/tsconfig.json, packages/console/resource/tsconfig.json, packages/console/support/tsconfig.json, packages/containers/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/desktop/tsconfig.json, packages/effect-drizzle-sqlite/tsconfig.json, packages/effect-sqlite-node/tsconfig.json, packages/enterprise/tsconfig.json, packages/function/tsconfig.json, packages/http-recorder/tsconfig.json, packages/httpapi-codegen/tsconfig.json, packages/llm/tsconfig.json, packages/opencode/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/protocol/tsconfig.json, packages/schema/tsconfig.json, packages/script/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-next/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/tsconfig.json, packages/server/tsconfig.json, packages/session-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/slack/tsconfig.json, packages/stats/app/tsconfig.json, packages/stats/core/tsconfig.json, packages/stats/server/tsconfig.json, packages/storybook/tsconfig.json, packages/tui/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/web/tsconfig.json, sdks/vscode/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, Nix |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 5 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |

### Code legibility for models — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.1 / 55 | 49/3099 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | packages/docs/openapi.json, packages/sdk/openapi.json |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | example, examples |

## Collection warnings

- Could not fetch npm package '@opencode-ai/app' from its registry
- Could not fetch npm package '@opencode-ai/script' from its registry
- Could not fetch npm package '@opencode-ai/http-recorder' from its registry
- deps.dev does not index npm:@opencode-ai/cli@1.18.4; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt