# baseballyama/rsvelte — health index 83/100 (Excellent)

> Inspection of the public repository baseballyama/rsvelte by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/baseballyama/rsvelte
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/baseballyama/rsvelte
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/baseballyama/rsvelte/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/b/baseballyama/rsvelte.svg
- Inspected: 2026-09-18
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 93/100 | Exceptional |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 57/100 | Moderate |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 56/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 85/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 49/100 | Weak |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 92/100 | Excellent |

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Rust-powered Svelte ecosystem |
| Classification | web-ui, cli |
| Homepage | https://baseballyama.github.io/rsvelte/ |
| Primary language | Rust |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 219 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Created | 2026-01-04 |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 |
| Latest release | @rsvelte/svelte2tsx@0.2.27 |
| Commits (last year) | 4,651 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | compiler, formatter, language-server, linter, svelte, svelte3, svelte5, sveltejs |

## Vitality — 93/100 (Exceptional)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 89/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 24.9 / 36 | 36/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 4651 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 1 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~0 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 1 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 57/100 (Moderate)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 46/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 37.9 / 60 | 219 stars |
| Forks | partial | 8.3 / 25 | 11 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 1 watchers |

### Community health — 70/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 56/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 29/100 (At Risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 3.4 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 85% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 10.8 / 13.5 | 8 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | partial | 6 / 10 | project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 82/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 41.5 / 42 | 99% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 27.6 / 30 | 3038/3308 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | met | 13 / 13 | 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 63/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 15.4 / 25 | 139 followers of baseballyama |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 130 public repos, account ~10 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 85/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 82/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 21 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/rsvelte/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_ast_equiv/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_bench/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_bindings_support/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_capi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_check/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_compiler_wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_compiler_wasm_bindings/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_content_mapper/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_devtools/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_diagnostics/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_esrap/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_fmt/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_fmt_wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_formatter/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_language_server/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 18 / 20 | 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9 |

### Documentation — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://baseballyama.github.io/rsvelte/ |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 8 topics |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 49/100 (Weak)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 49/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 2.2 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | partial | 1.5 / 2.5 | project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 4 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 13 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 92/100 (Excellent)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 68 of 68 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 93/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | partial | 12.6 / 18 | Cargo.toml, apps/zed/Cargo.toml, crates/rsvelte/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/rsvelte/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_ast_equiv/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_bench/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_bindings_support/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_capi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_check/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_compiler_wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_compiler_wasm_bindings/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_content_mapper/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_devtools/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_diagnostics/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_esrap/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_fmt/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_fmt_wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_formatter/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/rsvelte_language_server/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | apps/npm/language-server/tsconfig.json, apps/npm/vite-plugin-svelte/tsconfig.json, apps/npm/vscode/tsconfig.json, apps/playground/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/array-extends/project/generated/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/array-extends/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/basic/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/boundary-elements/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/external-self-alias/project/pkg-a/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/js-rune-module-without-allow-js-loose/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/js-rune-module-without-allow-js-nodenext/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/js-rune-module-without-allow-js/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-hooks-arrow-ts/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-hooks-fn-ts/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-hooks-js/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-hooks-satisfies-ts/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-jsdoc-longtail-js/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-load-augmentation-js/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-load-augmentation-ts/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/kit-routes-js/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/sibling-paths-alias/project/pkg-a/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/sibling-symlink/project/pkg-a/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-config-accessors-off/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-config-accessors/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-config-namespace-foreign/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-config-namespace-html/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-config-recognised-option/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-config-unrecognised-option/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-import-diagnostic-line/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/svelte-type-reference/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-aliased-import/project/pkg-a/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-aliased-rune-module-nodenext/project/pkg-a/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-companion-named-import-bundler/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-companion-named-import-probe-scope/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-companion-named-import/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-instance-reexport/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-paths-non-relative/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-relative-import-bundler/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts-relative-import-nodenext/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/check-fixtures/ts7-native/project/tsconfig.json, compatibility/lsp-fixtures/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | met | 10 / 10 | 68 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| Automated maintenance | met | 8 / 8 | 23 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 8 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |

### Code legibility for models — 98/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Rust (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 53.3 / 55 | 73/2387 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | excluded | 0 / 40 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| MCP server | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Could not fetch crates package 'zed_rsvelte' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rsvelte' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rsvelte_fmt' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rsvelte_capi' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rsvelte_core' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rsvelte_bench' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rsvelte_check' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rsvelte_esrap' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt