# cloudflare/agents — health index 76/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository cloudflare/agents by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 76 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/cloudflare/agents
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/cloudflare/agents
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/cloudflare/agents/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/c/cloudflare/agents.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-14
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 99/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 89/100 | Excellent |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 62/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 78/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 50/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 67/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Build and deploy AI Agents on Cloudflare |
| Homepage | https://developers.cloudflare.com/agents/ |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 5,257 |
| Forks | 625 |
| Created | 2025-01-29 |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 |
| Latest release | agents@0.17.4 |
| Commits (last year) | 1,052 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | agents, ai, cloudflare, durable-objects, workflows |

## Vitality — 99/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 98/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 33.9 / 36 | 49/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1052 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 0 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~1.7 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 89/100 (Excellent)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | met | 60 / 60 | 5,257 stars |
| Forks | partial | 23.3 / 25 | 625 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 8.5 / 15 | 35 watchers |

### Community health — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 62/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 8 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 64% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 69 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 14 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 72/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 39 / 46.8 | 84% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 32.8 / 38.2 | 1063/1238 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | met | 25 / 25 | 14,434 followers of cloudflare |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 568 public repos, account ~16 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 78/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 64/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 6 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 16 / 20 | 25 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |

### Documentation — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://developers.cloudflare.com/agents/ |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 5 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 50/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 50/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 2.2 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | partial | 2 / 2.5 | 25 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 14 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 13 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 67/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, agent-think/AGENTS.md, design/AGENTS.md, docs/AGENTS.md, examples/AGENTS.md, guides/AGENTS.md, packages/agents/AGENTS.md, wip/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 52/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | agent-think/tests-e2e/tsconfig.json, agent-think/tsconfig.json, examples/a2a/tsconfig.json, examples/agent-skills/tsconfig.json, examples/agents-as-tools/e2e/tsconfig.json, examples/agents-as-tools/src/tests/tsconfig.json, examples/agents-as-tools/tsconfig.json, examples/ai-chat/tsconfig.json, examples/assistant/src/tests/tsconfig.json, examples/assistant/tsconfig.json, examples/auth-agent/tsconfig.json, examples/browser-live-view/tsconfig.json, examples/browser-quick-actions/tsconfig.json, examples/chat-sdk-messenger/tsconfig.json, examples/codemode-browser/tsconfig.json, examples/codemode-connectors/tsconfig.json, examples/codemode-mcp-openapi/tsconfig.json, examples/codemode-mcp/tsconfig.json, examples/codemode/tsconfig.json, examples/context-overflow-recovery/tsconfig.json, examples/cross-domain/tsconfig.json, examples/deploy-churn/tsconfig.json, examples/dynamic-tools/tsconfig.json, examples/dynamic-workers-playground/tsconfig.json, examples/dynamic-workers/tsconfig.json, examples/elevenlabs-starter/tsconfig.json, examples/email-agent/tsconfig.json, examples/github-webhook/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp-client/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp-elicitation/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp-rpc-transport/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp-worker-authenticated/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp-worker/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp/tsconfig.json, examples/multi-ai-chat/tsconfig.json, examples/playground/tsconfig.json, examples/push-notifications/tsconfig.json, examples/resumable-stream-chat/tsconfig.json, examples/sandbox-coding-agent/tsconfig.json, examples/structured-input/tsconfig.json, examples/telnyx-voice-agent/tsconfig.json, examples/think-chat-sdk/tsconfig.json, examples/think-react-router/e2e/tsconfig.json, examples/think-react-router/tsconfig.json, examples/think-submissions/tsconfig.json, examples/think-tanstack-start/e2e/tsconfig.json, examples/think-tanstack-start/tsconfig.json, examples/think-workflows/tsconfig.json, examples/tictactoe/tsconfig.json, examples/voice-agent/tsconfig.json, examples/voice-input/tsconfig.json, examples/webmcp/tsconfig.json, examples/worker-bundler-playground/tsconfig.json, examples/workflows/tsconfig.json, examples/workspace-chat/tsconfig.json, examples/x402-mcp/tsconfig.json, examples/x402/tsconfig.json, experimental/chat-recovery-probe/tsconfig.json, experimental/forever-chat/tsconfig.json, experimental/forever-fibers/tsconfig.json, experimental/gadgets-chat/tsconfig.json, experimental/gadgets-gatekeeper/tsconfig.json, experimental/gadgets-sandbox/tsconfig.json, experimental/gadgets-subagents/tsconfig.json, experimental/gateway-resume-think/tsconfig.json, experimental/gateway-resume/tsconfig.json, experimental/inference-buffer/tsconfig.json, experimental/ops-approval-agent/tsconfig.json, experimental/pi-recovery/tsconfig.json, experimental/session-memory/tsconfig.json, experimental/session-multichat/tsconfig.json, experimental/session-planetscale/tsconfig.json, experimental/session-search/tsconfig.json, experimental/session-skills/tsconfig.json, experimental/tanstack-recovery/tsconfig.json, guides/anthropic-patterns/tsconfig.json, guides/human-in-the-loop/tsconfig.json, openai-sdk/basic/tsconfig.json, openai-sdk/call-my-agent/tsconfig.json, openai-sdk/chess-app/tsconfig.json, openai-sdk/handoffs/tsconfig.json, openai-sdk/human-in-the-loop/tsconfig.json, openai-sdk/llm-as-a-judge/tsconfig.json, openai-sdk/streaming-chat/tsconfig.json, packages/agents/src/react-tests/tsconfig.json, packages/agents/src/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/agents/tsconfig.json, packages/ai-chat/src/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/ai-chat/tsconfig.json, packages/codemode/src/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/codemode/tsconfig.json, packages/create-think/tsconfig.json, packages/hono-agents/tsconfig.json, packages/shell/src/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/shell/tsconfig.json, packages/think/src/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/think/tsconfig.json, packages/voice/src/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/voice/tsconfig.json, packages/worker-bundler/src/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/worker-bundler/tsconfig.json, site/agents/tsconfig.json, think-starters/basic/tsconfig.json, think-starters/business-workflow/tsconfig.json, think-starters/coding-agent/tsconfig.json, think-starters/customer-support/tsconfig.json, think-starters/personal-assistant/tsconfig.json, think-starters/webhook-agent/tsconfig.json, voice-providers/deepgram/tsconfig.json, voice-providers/elevenlabs/tsconfig.json, voice-providers/telnyx/tsconfig.json, voice-providers/twilio/tsconfig.json, wip/issue-1625-live/tsconfig.json, wip/issue-1677-minimal/tsconfig.json, wip/issue-1691-live/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.1 / 55 | 24/1391 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | demos, examples |

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt