# directive-run/directive — health index 59/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository directive-run/directive by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/directive-run/directive
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/directive-run/directive
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/directive-run/directive/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/d/directive-run/directive.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-15
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 83/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 41/100 | At risk |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 37/100 | At risk |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 82/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 48/100 | At risk |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 74/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Constraint-driven runtime for TypeScript. Declare requirements, let the runtime resolve them. |
| Homepage | https://directive.run |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| Stars | 2 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Created | 2026-02-14 |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 |
| Latest release | @directive-run/mcp@0.6.4 |
| Commits (last year) | 808 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | declarative, directive, state-management, typescript, runtime, devtools, time-travel, ai, ai-agents, javascript, llm, open-source, orchestration, react, reactive, reactive-programming, signals, svelte, typescript-library, vue |

## Vitality — 83/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 79/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 1 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 15.2 / 36 | 22/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 808 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 1 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~2.7 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 41/100 (At risk)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 2 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 1 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 1 watchers |

### Community health — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 37/100 (At risk)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 14/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 1.8 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 92% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 2.7 / 13.5 | 2 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | not met | 0 / 10 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 67/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 46.8 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | partial | 35.7 / 38.2 | 85/91 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 35/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 2.2 / 25 | 1 followers of directive-run |
| Track record | partial | 3 / 25 | 1 public repos, account ~0 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 82/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 76/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 3 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | biome.json |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 12 / 20 | 8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |

### Documentation — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://directive.run |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 20 topics |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 48/100 (At risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 48/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| CI-Tests | partial | 1.5 / 2.5 | 8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | not met | 0 / 2.5 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 4 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | partial | 6.8 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 52 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 74/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 76/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | biome.json |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | e2e/fixtures/lit/tsconfig.json, e2e/fixtures/react/tsconfig.json, e2e/fixtures/solid/tsconfig.json, e2e/fixtures/svelte/tsconfig.json, e2e/fixtures/vue/tsconfig.json, e2e/tsconfig.json, examples/ab-testing/tsconfig.json, examples/ai-checkpoint/tsconfig.json, examples/ai-guardrails/tsconfig.json, examples/async-chains/tsconfig.json, examples/auth-flow/tsconfig.json, examples/batch-resolver/tsconfig.json, examples/checkers/tsconfig.json, examples/cloudflare-directive-ai/tsconfig.json, examples/compliance-audit/tsconfig.json, examples/contact-form/tsconfig.json, examples/counter-react/tsconfig.json, examples/counter-svelte/tsconfig.json, examples/counter-vue/tsconfig.json, examples/counter/tsconfig.json, examples/dashboard-loader/tsconfig.json, examples/data-triggers/tsconfig.json, examples/debounce-constraints/tsconfig.json, examples/dynamic-modules/tsconfig.json, examples/eleven-up/tsconfig.json, examples/error-boundaries/tsconfig.json, examples/feature-flags/tsconfig.json, examples/form-wizard/tsconfig.json, examples/fraud-analysis/tsconfig.json, examples/goal-heist/tsconfig.json, examples/multi-module/tsconfig.json, examples/newsletter/tsconfig.json, examples/notifications/tsconfig.json, examples/number-match/tsconfig.json, examples/optimistic-updates/tsconfig.json, examples/pagination/tsconfig.json, examples/permissions/tsconfig.json, examples/provider-routing/tsconfig.json, examples/schema-patterns/tsconfig.json, examples/server/tsconfig.json, examples/shopping-cart/tsconfig.json, examples/sudoku/tsconfig.json, examples/theme-locale/tsconfig.json, examples/time-machine/tsconfig.json, examples/topic-guard/tsconfig.json, examples/url-sync/tsconfig.json, examples/websocket/tsconfig.json, packages/ai/tsconfig.json, packages/claude-plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/el/tsconfig.json, packages/knowledge/tsconfig.json, packages/lint/tsconfig.json, packages/lit/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/mutator/tsconfig.json, packages/optimistic/tsconfig.json, packages/query/tsconfig.json, packages/react/tsconfig.json, packages/sandbox/tsconfig.json, packages/scaffold/tsconfig.json, packages/solid/tsconfig.json, packages/sources/tsconfig.json, packages/svelte/tsconfig.json, packages/timeline/tsconfig.json, packages/vite-plugin-api-proxy/tsconfig.json, packages/vue/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 8 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |

### Code legibility for models — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.4 / 55 | 8/786 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples, recipes |

## Collection warnings

- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt