# dynemo-ai/dynemo — health index 89/100 (Excellent)

> Inspection of the public repository dynemo-ai/dynemo by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/dynemo-ai/dynemo
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/dynemo-ai/dynemo
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/dynemo-ai/dynemo/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/d/dynemo-ai/dynemo.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-19
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.14.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 100/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 91/100 | Excellent |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 82/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 95/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 75/100 | Good |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 89/100 | Excellent |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | A Datacenter Scale Distributed Inference Serving Framework |
| Homepage | https://docs.nvidia.com/dynamo/latest |
| Primary language | Rust |
| Stars | 7,526 |
| Forks | 1,348 |
| Created | 2025-03-03 |
| Last push | 2026-07-19 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0-inkling-dev.1 |
| Commits (last year) | 4,940 |
| Bus factor | 14 |
| Topics | diffusion, disaggregated-serving, kubernetes, llm-inference, omni, routing-engine, rust, sglang, tensorrt-llm, vllm |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | data-generator | 1.0.1 | 218 |
| pypi | ai-dynamo | 1.2.1 | 34,248 |

## Vitality — 100/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | met | 36 / 36 | 52/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 4940 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 38 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 2 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~7.7 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 91/100 (Excellent)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 95/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | met | 60 / 60 | 7,526 stars |
| Forks | met | 25 / 25 | 1,348 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 10.3 / 15 | 72 watchers |

### Community health — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 82/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 98/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | met | 54 / 54 | 14 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 20.8 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 8% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 100 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 82/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 40.4 / 46.8 | 86% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 29 / 38.2 | 7303/9630 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | excluded | 0 / 15 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Ownership & stewardship — 62/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 20.6 / 25 | 734 followers of ai-dynamo |
| Track record | partial | 11.3 / 25 | 14 public repos, account ~1 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 95/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 38 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .golangci.yml |
| Pre-commit hooks | met | 9.6 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Documentation — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://docs.nvidia.com/dynamo/latest |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 10 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 75/100 (Good)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 75/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security policy (SECURITY.md) | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Dependabot config | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Dependency lockfiles | met | 25 / 25 | Cargo.lock, go.sum |
| CodeQL workflow | met | 20 / 20 | — |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 89/100 (Excellent)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, components/src/dynamo/common/backend/AGENTS.md, components/src/dynamo/common/backend/CLAUDE.md, components/src/dynamo/frontend/CLAUDE.md, components/src/dynamo/router/AGENTS.md, components/src/dynamo/router/CLAUDE.md, components/src/dynamo/sglang/AGENTS.md, components/src/dynamo/sglang/CLAUDE.md, deploy/operator/AGENTS.md, deploy/operator/api/AGENTS.md, deploy/operator/internal/controller/AGENTS.md, deploy/operator/internal/webhook/validation/AGENTS.md, deploy/operator/test/e2e/AGENTS.md, docs/AGENTS.md, docs/backends/sglang/agents.md, lib/backend-common/AGENTS.md, lib/backend-common/CLAUDE.md, lib/bench/AGENTS.md, lib/bench/CLAUDE.md, lib/data-gen/AGENTS.md, lib/data-gen/CLAUDE.md, lib/kv-router/AGENTS.md, lib/kv-router/CLAUDE.md, lib/kv-router/src/indexer/concurrent_radix_tree_compressed/AGENTS.md, lib/kv-router/src/indexer/concurrent_radix_tree_compressed/CLAUDE.md, lib/kv-router/src/scheduling/AGENTS.md, lib/kv-router/src/scheduling/CLAUDE.md, lib/kv-router/src/sequences/AGENTS.md, lib/kv-router/src/sequences/CLAUDE.md, lib/kv-router/src/services/AGENTS.md, lib/kv-router/src/services/CLAUDE.md, lib/kv-router/src/services/indexer/AGENTS.md, lib/kv-router/src/services/indexer/CLAUDE.md, lib/kv-router/src/services/slot_tracker/AGENTS.md, lib/kv-router/src/services/slot_tracker/CLAUDE.md, lib/kvbm-engine/AGENTS.md, lib/kvbm-engine/CLAUDE.md, lib/kvbm-kernels/AGENTS.md, lib/kvbm-kernels/CLAUDE.md, lib/kvbm-logical/AGENTS.md, lib/kvbm-logical/CLAUDE.md, lib/llm/src/kv_router/AGENTS.md, lib/llm/src/kv_router/CLAUDE.md, lib/llm/src/local_model/AGENTS.md, lib/llm/src/local_model/CLAUDE.md, lib/llm/src/request_trace/AGENTS.md, lib/llm/src/request_trace/CLAUDE.md, lib/mocker/src/replay/offline/CLAUDE.md, lib/mocker/src/scheduler/vllm/AGENTS.md, lib/mocker/src/scheduler/vllm/CLAUDE.md, tests/AGENTS.md, tests/CLAUDE.md, tests/router/AGENTS.md, tests/router/CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | deploy/helm/charts/platform/Makefile, deploy/helm/charts/power-agent/Makefile, deploy/inference-gateway/epp/Makefile, deploy/inference-gateway/ext-proc/Makefile, deploy/operator/Makefile, deploy/snapshot/Makefile, examples/backends/tritonserver/Makefile, tests/fault_tolerance/hardware/fault_injection_service/cuda_fault_injection/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .golangci.yml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | lib/bindings/python/src/dynamo/_internal/py.typed, lib/bindings/python/src/dynamo/py.typed |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Code legibility for models — 98/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Rust (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 52.9 / 55 | 104/2673 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | components/src/dynamo/planner/plugins/proto/v1/plugin.proto, deploy/inference-gateway/ext-proc/proto/envoy/config/core/v3/base.proto, deploy/inference-gateway/ext-proc/proto/envoy/extensions/filters/http/ext_proc/v3/processing_mode.proto, deploy/inference-gateway/ext-proc/proto/envoy/service/ext_proc/v3/external_processor.proto, deploy/inference-gateway/ext-proc/proto/envoy/type/v3/http_status.proto, lib/backend/sglang-sidecar/proto/sglang.proto, lib/backend/vllm-sidecar/proto/vllm_grpc.proto, lib/llm/src/grpc/protos/kserve.proto, lib/llm/src/grpc/protos/model_config.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples, recipes, sample, samples |

## Collection warnings

- pypi package 'data-generator' points at a different repository (https://github.com/bednaJedna/data_generator); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- pypi package 'ai-dynamo' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ai-dynamo/dynamo.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt