# eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro — health index 48/100 (At risk)

> Inspection of the public repository eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the At risk band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/e/eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-14
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 56/100 | Moderate |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 32/100 | At risk |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 52/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 63/100 | Moderate |
| Security | 16% | 33/100 | At risk |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 69/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Eclipse Furo offers simple, enterprise-tailored, language-independent API development. It comes with multiple sources of truth and generates border-crossing type and service definitions. |
| Homepage | https://furo.pro |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Created | 2021-06-17 |
| Last push | 2026-07-11 |
| Latest release | v1.37.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 33 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | api, api-design, furo, grpc, grpc-gateway, homebrew, rest, swagger, webstack |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro/protoc-gen-debugfile | v1.52.2 | — |
| go | github.com/eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro/protoc-gen-om-jsonschema | v1.52.2 | — |
| go | github.com/eclipse-furo/eclipsefuro/protoc-gen-open-models | v1.52.3 | — |

## Vitality — 56/100 (Moderate)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 59/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 3 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 6.9 / 36 | 10/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | partial | 13.8 / 18 | 33 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | partial | 2 / 10 | 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2 |

### Release discipline — 52/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 6 releases published |
| Release recency | not met | 0 / 36 | latest release 1485 days ago |
| Release cadence | partial | 19.8 / 27 | a release every ~55.7 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 32/100 (At risk)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 17/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 14.6 / 60 | 9 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 2 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 2.7 / 15 | 4 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 52/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 13/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 1.2 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 95% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 2.7 / 13.5 | 2 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | not met | 0 / 10 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 75/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 36.9 / 46.8 | 79% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | met | 38.2 / 38.2 | 21/21 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 38/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 followers of eclipse-furo |
| Track record | partial | 8.4 / 25 | 4 public repos, account ~1 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 3 package(s) on go |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 3 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 19 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 63/100 (Moderate)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 38/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | not met | 0 / 24 | — |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://furo.pro |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 9 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 33/100 (At risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 33/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | not met | 0 / 2.5 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | excluded | 0 / 10 | no workflows found |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | partial | 1.5 / 7.5 | 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | no SAST tool detected |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | No tokens found |
| Vulnerabilities | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 69/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 52/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | Go (statically typed) |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Go (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 46.5 / 55 | 10/65 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/blueberry/llm/llm.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/blueberry/profile/profile.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/blueberry/profile/profileservice.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/blueberry/profile/reqmsgs.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/experimental/tus/tus.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/cube/colours.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/cube/cube.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/cube/cubeservice.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/cube/enums.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/fat/fat.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/furo.Link.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/constraint_wrappers.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/decimal.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/decimal_range.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/defaults.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/enum_furo_identifier.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/enum_ref_type.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/identifier.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/numeric.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/numeric64.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/tree.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/uints.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto/furo/type/wrappers.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/annotations.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/auth.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/backend.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/billing.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/client.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/config_change.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/consumer.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/context.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/control.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/distribution.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/documentation.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/endpoint.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/error_reason.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/field_behavior.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/field_info.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/http.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/httpbody.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/label.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/launch_stage.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/log.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/logging.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/metric.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/monitored_resource.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/monitoring.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/policy.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/quota.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/resource.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/routing.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/service.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/source_info.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/system_parameter.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/usage.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/api/visibility.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/cloud/audit/audit_log.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/cloud/extended_operations.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/cloud/location/locations.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/geo/type/viewport.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/logging/type/http_request.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/logging/type/log_severity.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/longrunning/operations.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/any.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/api.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/duration.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/empty.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/field_mask.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/source_context.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/struct.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/timestamp.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/type.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/protobuf/wrappers.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/rpc/code.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/rpc/context/attribute_context.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/rpc/context/audit_context.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/rpc/error_details.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/rpc/status.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/calendar_period.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/color.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/date.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/datetime.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/dayofweek.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/decimal.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/expr.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/fraction.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/interval.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/latlng.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/localized_text.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/money.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/month.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/phone_number.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/postal_address.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/quaternion.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/google/type/timeofday.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/proto_dependencies/openapiv3/annotations.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/extensions/extension.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/annotations.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, protoc-gen-om-jsonschema/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic/openapiv3/annotations.proto, protoc-gen-open-models/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/extensions/extension.proto, protoc-gen-open-models/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, protoc-gen-open-models/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/annotations.proto, protoc-gen-open-models/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, protoc-gen-open-models/vendor/github.com/google/gnostic/openapiv3/annotations.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | example |

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt