# equinor/fusion-framework — health index 75/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository equinor/fusion-framework by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/equinor/fusion-framework
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/equinor/fusion-framework
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/equinor/fusion-framework/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/e/equinor/fusion-framework.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-16
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 98/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 56/100 | Moderate |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 70/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 80/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 65/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 73/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Fusion Framework, built and maintained to Fusion Core |
| Homepage | https://equinor.github.io/fusion-framework/ |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Created | 2021-05-27 |
| Last push | 2026-07-15 |
| Latest release | @equinor/fusion-framework-module-ag-grid@36.0.2 |
| Commits (last year) | 1,231 |
| Bus factor | 2 |
| Topics | changeset, framework, modules, monorepo, react, equinor, fusion |

## Vitality — 98/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 96/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 31.8 / 36 | 46/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1231 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 1 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~2.1 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 56/100 (Moderate)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 25/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 14.6 / 60 | 9 stars |
| Forks | partial | 7.5 / 25 | 9 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 2.7 / 15 | 4 watchers |

### Community health — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 70/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 57/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 25.2 / 54 | 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 12.3 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 45% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 14 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | partial | 6 / 10 | project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 78/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 41 / 46.8 | 88% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 22.2 / 38.2 | 2738/4707 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | met | 15 / 15 | all changesets reviewed |

### Ownership & stewardship — 78/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 23.3 / 25 | 1,752 followers of equinor |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 750 public repos, account ~15 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 80/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 15 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc, biome.json |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 65/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://equinor.github.io/fusion-framework/ |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 7 topics |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 65/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 65/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 3.8 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | all changesets reviewed |
| Contributors | partial | 1.5 / 2.5 | project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool is run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 28 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 73/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .cursor/rules/changeset-generation.mdc, .cursor/rules/github-cli-file-bodies.mdc, .cursor/rules/monorepo-package-resolution.mdc, .cursor/rules/package-manager.mdc, .cursor/rules/pull-request.mdc, .cursor/rules/spec-sync.mdc, .cursor/rules/typescript-documentation.mdc, .cursor/rules/vitest-testing.mdc, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/changesets.instructions.md, .github/instructions/code-generation.instructions.md, .github/instructions/dependabot-pr.instructions.md, .github/instructions/documentation.instructions.md, .github/instructions/monorepo-structure.instructions.md, .github/instructions/pull-requests.instructions.md, .github/instructions/react.instructions.md, .github/instructions/skills.instructions.md, .github/instructions/testing.instructions.md, .github/instructions/workflow-contribution.instructions.md, AGENT.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 66/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc, biome.json |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | cookbooks/app-react-ag-grid/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-ai/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-apploader/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-assets/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-bookmark-advanced/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-bookmark/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-charts/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-context-custom-error/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-context/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-environment-variables/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-feature-flag/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-module/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-msal/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-people/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-router/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-settings/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react-styling/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-react/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/app-vanilla/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/poc-portal/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/portal-analytics/tsconfig.json, cookbooks/portal/tsconfig.json, packages/app/tsconfig.json, packages/cli-plugins/ai-base/tsconfig.json, packages/cli-plugins/ai-chat/tsconfig.json, packages/cli-plugins/ai-index/tsconfig.json, packages/cli-plugins/copilot/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/dev-portal/tsconfig.json, packages/dev-server/tsconfig.json, packages/framework/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/ag-grid/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/ai/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/analytics/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/app/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/azure-identity/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/bookmark/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/context/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/event/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/feature-flag/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/http/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/module/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/msal-node/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/msal/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/navigation/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/service-discovery/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/services/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/signalr/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/telemetry/tsconfig.json, packages/modules/widget/tsconfig.json, packages/react/ag-charts/tsconfig.json, packages/react/ag-grid/tsconfig.json, packages/react/app/tsconfig.json, packages/react/components/bookmark/tsconfig.json, packages/react/components/people-resolver/tsconfig.json, packages/react/framework/tsconfig.json, packages/react/modules/bookmark/tsconfig.json, packages/react/modules/context/tsconfig.json, packages/react/modules/event/tsconfig.json, packages/react/modules/http/tsconfig.json, packages/react/modules/module/tsconfig.json, packages/react/modules/signalr/tsconfig.json, packages/react/router/tsconfig.json, packages/utils/imports/tsconfig.json, packages/utils/load-env/tsconfig.json, packages/utils/log/tsconfig.json, packages/utils/observable/tsconfig.json, packages/utils/query/tsconfig.json, packages/vite-plugins/api-service/tsconfig.json, packages/vite-plugins/raw-imports/tsconfig.json, packages/vite-plugins/spa/tsconfig.json, packages/widget/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | met | 55 / 55 | 0/1248 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | .agents/skills/fusion-github-review-resolution/assets/add-pull-request-review-thread-reply.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-github-review-resolution/assets/pull-request-review-threads.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-github-review-resolution/assets/pull-request-reviews.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-github-review-resolution/assets/resolve-review-thread.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-github-review-resolution/assets/unresolved-thread-count-for-review.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-issue-authoring/assets/graphql/issue_lookup.github.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-issue-authoring/assets/graphql/issue_type_update.github.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-issue-authoring/assets/graphql/issue_types_list.github.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-issue-authoring/assets/graphql/linkage_verify.github.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-issue-authoring/assets/graphql/sub_issue_remove.github.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-issue-authoring/assets/graphql/sub_issue_reprioritize.github.graphql, .agents/skills/fusion-issue-authoring/assets/graphql/sub_issue_write.github.graphql |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | not met | 0 / 40 | — |

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt