# ever-co/ever-gauzy — health index 78/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository ever-co/ever-gauzy by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/ever-co/ever-gauzy
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/ever-co/ever-gauzy
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/ever-co/ever-gauzy/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/e/ever-co/ever-gauzy.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-24
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.27.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 99/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 92/100 | Excellent |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 70/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 84/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 37/100 | At risk |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 81/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Ever® Gauzy™ - Open Business Management Platform (ERP/CRM/HRM/ATS/PM) - https://gauzy.co |
| Homepage | https://gauzy.co |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Stars | 3,791 |
| Forks | 789 |
| Created | 2019-06-02 |
| Last push | 2026-07-24 |
| Latest release | v111.6.1 |
| Commits (last year) | 1,157 |
| Bus factor | 2 |
| Topics | hr, salary, accounting, expenses, billing, productivity, time-tracker, team-management, invoices, invoicing, bookkeeping, payroll, crm, erp, timetracking, time-tracking, crm-platform, human-resources, issue-tracker, project-management |

## Vitality — 99/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 35.3 / 36 | 51/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1157 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 0 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~0.5 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 0 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 92/100 (Excellent)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 58 / 60 | 3,791 stars |
| Forks | partial | 24.1 / 25 | 789 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 9.7 / 15 | 57 watchers |

### Community health — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (AGPL-3.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 70/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 64/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 25.2 / 54 | 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 14.9 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 34% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 78 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 16 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 73/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 37 / 46.8 | 79% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 35.6 / 38.2 | 7276/7821 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 73/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 18.2 / 25 | 338 followers of ever-co |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 71 public repos, account ~8 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 84/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 64 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 75/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://gauzy.co |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 20 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 37/100 (At risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 44/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | partial | 6.8 / 7.5 | binaries present in source code |
| Branch-Protection | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 16 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | not met | 0 / 10 | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool detected |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 271 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 11/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 2606 resolved dependencies against OSV; 3639 could not be assessed (no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list). This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | partial | 0.9 / 35 | 44 affected: @angular/compiler 21.0.7 (critical 9.0), @angular/core 21.0.7 (critical 9.0), handlebars 4.7.8 (critical 9.8), +41 more |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | excluded | 0 / 25 | transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| No advisories left outstanding | partial | 7.2 / 40 | 24 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1904 days ago |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 81/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .cursor/rules/angular.mdc, .github/instructions/angular.instructions.md, .github/instructions/nebular.instructions.md, AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 64/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | apps/agent/tsconfig.json, apps/api/tsconfig.json, apps/desktop-api/tsconfig.json, apps/desktop-timer/tsconfig.json, apps/desktop/tsconfig.json, apps/gauzy-e2e/tests/tsconfig.json, apps/gauzy-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/gauzy/tsconfig.json, apps/mcp-auth/tsconfig.json, apps/mcp/tsconfig.json, apps/server-api/tsconfig.json, apps/server-mcp/tsconfig.json, apps/server/tsconfig.json, apps/worker/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/common/tsconfig.json, packages/config/tsconfig.json, packages/constants/tsconfig.json, packages/contracts/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/desktop-activity/tsconfig.json, packages/desktop-core/tsconfig.json, packages/desktop-lib/tsconfig.json, packages/desktop-ui-lib/tsconfig.json, packages/desktop-window/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/ai-chat-react-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/ai-chat/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/ai-provider-anthropic/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/ai-provider-gauzy-ai/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/ai-provider-openai/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/ai-provider-openrouter/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/ai-provider-vercel-gateway/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/camshot/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/changelog/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/dashboard-time-track-angular-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/dashboard-time-track-react-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-activepieces-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-activepieces/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-ai-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-ai/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-github-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-github/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-hubstaff-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-hubstaff/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-jira/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-make-com-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-make-com/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-plane-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-plane/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-sim-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-sim/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-upwork-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-upwork/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-wakatime/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-zapier-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-zapier/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/integration-zapier/zapier/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/jitsu-analytics/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/job-employee-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/job-matching-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/job-proposal-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/job-proposal/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/job-search-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/job-search/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/jobs-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/knowledge-base/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/legal-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/maintenance-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/onboarding-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/posthog-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/posthog/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/product-reviews/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/public-layout-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/registry/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/sentry-tracing/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/soundshot/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/videos-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/videos/tsconfig.json, packages/scheduler/tsconfig.json, packages/ui-auth/tsconfig.json, packages/ui-config/tsconfig.json, packages/ui-core/tsconfig.json, packages/ui-react-components/tsconfig.json, packages/ui-react/tsconfig.json, packages/utils/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | met | 10 / 10 | 63 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.9 / 55 | 20/8362 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | packages/plugins/integration-ai/src/lib/sdk/queries/query.graphql, packages/plugins/integration-ai/src/lib/sdk/schema.graphql |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Could not fetch npm package '@gauzy/core' from its registry
- Resolved dependency list truncated to 3000 of 6245 packages (counts remain complete)

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt