# fahara02/udb — health index 51/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository fahara02/udb by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/fahara02/udb
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/fahara02/udb
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/fahara02/udb/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/f/fahara02/udb.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-17
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.12.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 71/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 25/100 | Critical |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 45/100 | At risk |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 77/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 30/100 | At risk |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 48/100 | At risk |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | a rust based universal databroker with native services for your next project |
| Homepage | https://fahara02.github.io/udb/ |
| Primary language | Rust |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 1 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Created | 2026-05-31 |
| Last push | 2026-07-17 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 165 |
| Bus factor | 1 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates | udb | 0.4.0 | 52 |

## Vitality — 71/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 58/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 4.2 / 36 | 6/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 165 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | not met | 0 / 10 | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 9 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 7 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~4.9 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 25/100 (Critical)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 1 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 29/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 23 / 80 | 52 downloads/month across crates |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 45/100 (At risk)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 13/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | not met | 0 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 1.4 / 13.5 | 1 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | partial | 3 / 10 | project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 48/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 46.8 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | partial | 25.5 / 38.2 | 4/6 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 38/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 followers of fahara02 |
| Track record | partial | 20.3 / 25 | 42 public repos, account ~4 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 1 package(s) on crates |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 7 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 10 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 77/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 68/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 32 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://fahara02.github.io/udb/ |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 30/100 (At risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 30/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | partial | 6.8 / 7.5 | binaries present in source code |
| Branch-Protection | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | partial | 0.8 / 2.5 | project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | not met | 0 / 7.5 | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | partial | 2 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 48 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 48/100 (At risk)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 52/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | examples/ts_enterprise/tsconfig.json, sdk/python/udb_client/py.typed, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 97/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Rust (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 51.9 / 55 | 278/4913 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | examples/go_arbitary_project/proto/acme/billing/v1/acme_billing_v1.proto, examples/go_enterprise/proto/billing/v1/invoice.proto, examples/multi_project/proto/acme/billing/v1/invoice.proto, examples/multi_project/proto/zen/clinic/v1/appointment.proto, examples/php_arbitary_project/proto/acme/billing/v1/acme_billing_v1.proto, examples/php_quickstart/proto/shop/v1/customer.proto, examples/php_quickstart/proto/shop/v1/order.proto, examples/python_arbitary_project/proto/acme/billing/v1/acme_billing_v1.proto, examples/python_enterprise/proto/billing/v1/invoice.proto, examples/ts_enterprise/proto/billing/v1/invoice.proto, proto/udb/core/analytics/entity/v1/entities.proto, proto/udb/core/analytics/entity/v1/executor_performance_summary.proto, proto/udb/core/analytics/entity/v1/pipeline_metric_snapshot.proto, proto/udb/core/analytics/entity/v1/reconciliation_analytics_summary.proto, proto/udb/core/analytics/events/v1/analytics_events.proto, proto/udb/core/analytics/services/v1/analytics_service.proto, proto/udb/core/analytics/services/v1/core.proto, proto/udb/core/apikey/entity/v1/api_key.proto, proto/udb/core/apikey/entity/v1/api_key_usage.proto, proto/udb/core/apikey/entity/v1/entities.proto, proto/udb/core/apikey/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/apikey/events/v1/apikey_events.proto, proto/udb/core/apikey/services/v1/apikey_service.proto, proto/udb/core/apikey/services/v1/core.proto, proto/udb/core/asset/entity/v1/asset.proto, proto/udb/core/asset/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/asset/entity/v1/pipeline_definition.proto, proto/udb/core/asset/entity/v1/pipeline_instance.proto, proto/udb/core/asset/entity/v1/pipeline_step.proto, proto/udb/core/asset/events/v1/asset_events.proto, proto/udb/core/asset/services/v1/asset_service.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/device.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/entities.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/mfa_challenge.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/mfa_policy.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/otp.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/recovery_code.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/session.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/signing_key.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/token_family.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/token_revocation.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/user.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/webauthn.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/entity/v1/webauthn_policy.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/events/v1/authn_events.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/services/v1/authn_service.proto, proto/udb/core/authn/services/v1/core.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/access_decision_audit.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/authz_revision.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/entities.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/governance_enums.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_approval.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_canary.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_draft.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_rule.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_set.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_simulation.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_tuple.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/policy_version.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/role.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/role_permission.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/entity/v1/user_role.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/events/v1/authz_events.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/services/v1/authz_service.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/services/v1/core.proto, proto/udb/core/authz/services/v1/governance.proto, proto/udb/core/backup/entity/v1/backup_policy.proto, proto/udb/core/backup/entity/v1/backup_run.proto, proto/udb/core/backup/services/v1/backup_service.proto, proto/udb/core/cache/services/v1/cache_service.proto, proto/udb/core/common/v1/db.proto, proto/udb/core/common/v1/domain_types.proto, proto/udb/core/common/v1/dto.proto, proto/udb/core/common/v1/security.proto, proto/udb/core/common/v1/types.proto, proto/udb/core/config/entity/v1/flag.proto, proto/udb/core/config/services/v1/config_service.proto, proto/udb/core/control/entity/v1/control_plane_node_state.proto, proto/udb/core/control/entity/v1/control_plane_resource.proto, proto/udb/core/control/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/control/services/v1/control_plane_service.proto, proto/udb/core/control/services/v1/core.proto, proto/udb/core/embedding/entity/v1/embedding_source.proto, proto/udb/core/embedding/services/v1/embedding_service.proto, proto/udb/core/idp/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/idp/entity/v1/external_identity.proto, proto/udb/core/idp/entity/v1/identity_provider.proto, proto/udb/core/idp/entity/v1/saml_replay_entry.proto, proto/udb/core/idp/entity/v1/scim_directory_state.proto, proto/udb/core/idp/services/v1/core.proto, proto/udb/core/idp/services/v1/identity_provider_service.proto, proto/udb/core/livequery/services/v1/livequery_service.proto, proto/udb/core/lock/entity/v1/lock.proto, proto/udb/core/lock/services/v1/lock_service.proto, proto/udb/core/metering/entity/v1/quota_rule.proto, proto/udb/core/metering/entity/v1/usage_event.proto, proto/udb/core/metering/services/v1/metering_service.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/entity/v1/entities.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/entity/v1/notification.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/entity/v1/notification_log.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/entity/v1/notification_preference.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/entity/v1/notification_template.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/events/v1/notification_events.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/services/v1/core.proto, proto/udb/core/notification/services/v1/notification_service.proto, proto/udb/core/scheduler/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/scheduler/entity/v1/scheduled_job.proto, proto/udb/core/scheduler/services/v1/scheduler_service.proto, proto/udb/core/search/entity/v1/search_index.proto, proto/udb/core/search/services/v1/search_service.proto, proto/udb/core/storage/entity/v1/entities.proto, proto/udb/core/storage/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/storage/entity/v1/file.proto, proto/udb/core/storage/events/v1/storage_events.proto, proto/udb/core/storage/services/v1/storage_service.proto, proto/udb/core/tenant/entity/v1/entities.proto, proto/udb/core/tenant/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/tenant/entity/v1/tenant.proto, proto/udb/core/tenant/entity/v1/tenant_config.proto, proto/udb/core/tenant/events/v1/tenant_events.proto, proto/udb/core/tenant/services/v1/tenant_service.proto, proto/udb/core/vault/entity/v1/vault_db_credential_lease.proto, proto/udb/core/vault/entity/v1/vault_secret.proto, proto/udb/core/vault/entity/v1/vault_transit_key.proto, proto/udb/core/vault/services/v1/vault_service.proto, proto/udb/core/webhook/entity/v1/webhook_delivery.proto, proto/udb/core/webhook/entity/v1/webhook_endpoint.proto, proto/udb/core/webhook/services/v1/webhook_service.proto, proto/udb/core/webrtc/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/webrtc/entity/v1/peer.proto, proto/udb/core/webrtc/entity/v1/room.proto, proto/udb/core/webrtc/entity/v1/track.proto, proto/udb/core/webrtc/events/v1/webrtc_events.proto, proto/udb/core/webrtc/services/v1/egress.proto, proto/udb/core/webrtc/services/v1/webrtc_service.proto, proto/udb/core/workflow/entity/v1/enums.proto, proto/udb/core/workflow/entity/v1/workflow_instance.proto, proto/udb/core/workflow/services/v1/workflow_service.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/admin.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/blob.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/cdc.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/common.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/consistency.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/context.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/error.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/mutation.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/operation.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/outbox.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/record_batch.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/relational.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/stores.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/tx.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/types.proto, proto/udb/entity/v1/vector.proto, proto/udb/events/v1/udb_events.proto, proto/udb/sdk/live/v1/sdk_live.proto, proto/udb/services/v1/data_broker.proto, tests/golden/db_options_all.proto, tests/golden/legacy_sql_postgres_compat.proto, third_party/googleapis/google/api/annotations.proto, third_party/googleapis/google/api/field_behavior.proto, third_party/googleapis/google/api/http.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt