# hanzlahabib/rcode — health index 73/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository hanzlahabib/rcode by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/hanzlahabib/rcode
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/hanzlahabib/rcode
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/hanzlahabib/rcode/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/h/hanzlahabib/rcode.svg
- Inspected: 2026-09-19
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 84/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 43/100 | Weak |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 46/100 | Weak |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 81/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 63/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 63/100 | Moderate |

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | The AI team that never forgets — persistent Memory Bank, 45 specialist agents, and 109 commands that survive every session reset. Install once via npx @hanzlaa/rcode. Works with Claude Code and compatible AI harnesses. |
| Classification | cli, library |
| Homepage | https://www.npmjs.com/package/@hanzlaa/rcode |
| Primary language | JavaScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 2 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Created | 2026-04-10 |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 |
| Latest release | v4.17.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 1,889 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | agentic-workflow, ai, ai-agents, anthropic, claude, claude-code, cli, developer-tools, llm, memory |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @hanzlaa/rcode | 4.17.0 | 2,750 |

## Vitality — 84/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 80/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 2 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 15.9 / 36 | 23/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1889 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 19 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 9 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~8.3 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 43/100 (Weak)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 2 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 1 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 46/100 (Weak)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 10/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | not met | 0 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 1.4 / 13.5 | 1 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | not met | 0 / 10 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 82/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 41.7 / 42 | 99% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | met | 30 / 30 | 36/36 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 53/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 7.5 / 25 | 10 followers of hanzlahabib |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 98 public repos, account ~8 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 81/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 68/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 7 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://www.npmjs.com/package/@hanzlaa/rcode |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 10 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 63/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 54/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | not met | 0 / 2.5 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | partial | 3.5 / 5 | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@hanzlaa/rcode@4.17.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | met | 35 / 35 | no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | met | 25 / 25 | no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| No advisories left outstanding | excluded | 0 / 40 | no advisory carries a publication date |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 63/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-advisor-researcher.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-ahmed.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-assumptions-analyzer.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-code-fixer.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-code-reviewer.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-codebase-mapper.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-cross-platform-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-debugger.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-dep-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-deviation-analyzer.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-docs-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-edge-case-hunter.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-executor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-fatima.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-haitham.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-hanzla.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-hussain-pm.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-i18n-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-integration-checker.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-khalid.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-layla.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-mariam.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-nasser.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-noor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-nyquist-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-observability-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-omar.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-phase-researcher.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-planner.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-profiler.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-project-researcher.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-remediation-planner.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-research-synthesizer.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-roadmapper.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-sadiq.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-security-adversary.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-security-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-sprint-checker.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-ui-auditor.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-ux-designer.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-verifier.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-waleed.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-yousef.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-zahra.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rcode-zayd.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/codebase-mapper/detailed-guide.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/debugger/checkpoint-recovery.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/debugger/debug-session-state.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/debugger/hypothesis-templates.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/debugger/investigation-protocol.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/debugger/scientific-method.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/authentication-gates.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/deviation-rules.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/execution-flow.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/self-check.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/stub-detection.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/summary-creation.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/task-commit-protocol.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/executor/tdd-flow.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/phase-researcher/detailed-guide.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/planner/common-patterns.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/planner/dependency-analysis.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/planner/goal-backward-thinking.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/planner/sprint-verification.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/planner/task-templates.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/project-researcher/detailed-guide.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/roadmapper/detailed-guide.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/sprint-checker/dimensions.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/sprint-checker/process.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/anti-patterns.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/artifact-verification.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/behavioral-spot-checks.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/context-loading.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/data-flow-trace.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/gap-output.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/key-links.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/requirements-coverage.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/agents/rules/verifier/verification-report.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/add-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/add-tests.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/add-todo.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/analyze-dependencies.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/audit-fix.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/audit-milestone.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/audit-uat.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/audit.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/autonomous.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/brainstorm.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/capture.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/chain.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/check-implementation-readiness.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/check-todos.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/checkpoint-preview.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/cleanup.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/code-review.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/complete-milestone.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/config.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/correct-course.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/council.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/create-architecture.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/create-epics-and-stories.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/create-prd.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/create-story.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/dashboard.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/debug.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/decisions.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/dev-story.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/diagnose-issues.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/diff.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/discuss-phase-power.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/discuss-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/discuss.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/do.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/docs-update.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/document-project.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/edit-prd.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/enable-hooks.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/execute-milestone.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/execute-sprint.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/execute.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/explore.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/export-to-github.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/feature-drift.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/forensics.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/from-template.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/health.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/help.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/import.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/inbox.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/init.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/insert-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/install.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/karpathy-audit.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/lens-audit.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/list-plans.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/list-workspaces.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/map-codebase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/memory-audit.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/memory-distill.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/memory-init.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/memory-update.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/milestone-summary.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/new-milestone.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/new-project-research.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/new-project-roadmap.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/new-project.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/new-workspace.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/next.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/note.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/notify-test.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/pause-work.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/plan-milestone-gaps.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/plan-milestone.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/plan.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/plant-seed.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/pr-branch.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/prfaq.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/profile-user.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/progress.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/quick.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/remove-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/remove-workspace.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/replay.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/rerun.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/research-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/resume-work.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/retrospective.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/review-edge-case-hunter.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/review-fix.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/review.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/scaffold-milestone.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/scaffold-project.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/scaffold-skill.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/scan.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/secure-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/session-report.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/settings.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/ship.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/show.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/sprint-planning.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/sprint-status.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/stats.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/status.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/ui-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/ui-review.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/undo.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/update.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/validate-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/validate-prd.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/verify-phase.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/verify-work.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/why.mdc, .cursor/rules/rcode/commands/workstream.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md, rcode/skills/seo/seo-content-factory/rules/agents.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 37/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 54/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | not met | 0 / 45 | JavaScript without a type-check config |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.2 / 55 | 4/260 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | excluded | 0 / 40 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- npm package '@hanzlaa/rcode' points at a different repository (https://github.com/hanzlahabib/rihal-code); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt