# johnqh/mail_box_components — health index 57/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository johnqh/mail_box_components by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/johnqh/mail_box_components
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/johnqh/mail_box_components
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/johnqh/mail_box_components/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/j/johnqh/mail_box_components.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-24
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.27.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 96/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 25/100 | Critical |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 37/100 | At risk |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 74/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 51/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 73/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| Stars | 0 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Created | 2025-09-05 |
| Last push | 2026-07-18 |
| Latest release | v5.0.97 |
| Commits (last year) | 559 |
| Bus factor | 1 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @sudobility/components | 5.0.97 | 5,810 |

## Vitality — 96/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 93/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 5 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 29.1 / 36 | 42/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 559 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 5 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~2.1 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 5 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 25/100 (Critical)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 0 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 25/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | not met | 0 / 22.5 | no license file detected |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 63/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 50.2 / 80 | 5,810 downloads/month across npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 37/100 (At risk)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 10/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | not met | 0 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 1.4 / 13.5 | 1 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | not met | 0 / 10 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 6/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 46.8 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | partial | 3.1 / 38.2 | 2/25 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 51/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 5.6 / 25 | 5 followers of johnqh |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 174 public repos, account ~12 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 1 package(s) on npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 5 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 242 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 74/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 80/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 1 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.js |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 65/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Repository description | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 51/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 39/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | not met | 0 / 2.5 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | not met | 0 / 2.5 | license file not detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | no SAST tool detected |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 63 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@sudobility/components@5.0.97 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | met | 35 / 35 | no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | met | 25 / 25 | no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| No advisories left outstanding | excluded | 0 / 40 | no advisory carries a publication date |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

## AI Readiness — 73/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | CLAUDE.md, packages/agriculture-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/analytics-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/auth-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/automotive-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/collaboration-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/communication-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/construction-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/design-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/devops-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/documents-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/ecommerce-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/education-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/email-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/energy-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/entertainment-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/entity-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/events-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/finance-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/fitness-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/food-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/gaming-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/government-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/healthcare-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/hr-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/insurance-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/interaction-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/iot-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/legal-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/logistics-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/manufacturing-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/marketing-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/media-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/monitoring-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/nonprofit-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/project-management-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/ratelimit-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/realestate-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/retail-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/scheduling-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/scientific-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/search-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/security-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/social-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/subscription-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/travel-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/visualization-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/web3-components/CLAUDE.md, packages/workflow-components/CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 54/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.js |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | packages/agriculture-components/tsconfig.json, packages/analytics-components/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-components/tsconfig.json, packages/automotive-components/tsconfig.json, packages/collaboration-components/tsconfig.json, packages/communication-components/tsconfig.json, packages/construction-components/tsconfig.json, packages/design-components/tsconfig.json, packages/devops-components/tsconfig.json, packages/documents-components/tsconfig.json, packages/ecommerce-components/tsconfig.json, packages/education-components/tsconfig.json, packages/email-components/tsconfig.json, packages/energy-components/tsconfig.json, packages/entertainment-components/tsconfig.json, packages/entity-components/tsconfig.json, packages/events-components/tsconfig.json, packages/finance-components/tsconfig.json, packages/fitness-components/tsconfig.json, packages/food-components/tsconfig.json, packages/gaming-components/tsconfig.json, packages/government-components/tsconfig.json, packages/healthcare-components/tsconfig.json, packages/hr-components/tsconfig.json, packages/insurance-components/tsconfig.json, packages/interaction-components/tsconfig.json, packages/iot-components/tsconfig.json, packages/legal-components/tsconfig.json, packages/logistics-components/tsconfig.json, packages/manufacturing-components/tsconfig.json, packages/marketing-components/tsconfig.json, packages/media-components/tsconfig.json, packages/monitoring-components/tsconfig.json, packages/nonprofit-components/tsconfig.json, packages/project-management-components/tsconfig.json, packages/ratelimit-components/tsconfig.json, packages/realestate-components/tsconfig.json, packages/retail-components/tsconfig.json, packages/scheduling-components/tsconfig.json, packages/scientific-components/tsconfig.json, packages/search-components/tsconfig.json, packages/security-components/tsconfig.json, packages/social-components/tsconfig.json, packages/subscription-components/tsconfig.json, packages/travel-components/tsconfig.json, packages/visualization-components/tsconfig.json, packages/web3-components/tsconfig.json, packages/workflow-components/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Demonstrated agent practice | met | 10 / 10 | 11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | met | 55 / 55 | 0/1139 source files over 60KB |

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt