# kvet/queuert — health index 59/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository kvet/queuert by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/kvet/queuert
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/kvet/queuert
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/kvet/queuert/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/k/kvet/queuert.svg
- Inspected: 2026-09-15
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 86/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 47/100 | Weak |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 52/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 77/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 1/100 | Critical |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 75/100 | Good |

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Durable, typed job chains that commit with your database transactions. No Redis required, no separate server. |
| Classification | library |
| Homepage | https://kvet.github.io/queuert/ |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 24 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Created | 2025-10-28 |
| Last push | 2026-09-06 |
| Latest release | v0.15.1 |
| Commits (last year) | 415 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | background-jobs, job-queue, nodejs, postgresql, queue, sqlite, transactional-outbox, typescript, workflow, durable-execution, job-chains, nats, redis |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | queuert | 0.15.1 | 33,336 |
| npm | @queuert/nats | 0.15.1 | 174 |
| npm | @queuert/otel | 0.15.1 | 1,293 |
| npm | @queuert/redis | 0.15.1 | 1,278 |
| npm | @queuert/sqlite | 0.15.1 | 160 |
| npm | @queuert/postgres | 0.15.1 | 29,632 |
| npm | @queuert/dashboard | 0.15.1 | 1,378 |

## Vitality — 86/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | partial | 28.8 / 36 | last push 8 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 22.8 / 36 | 33/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 415 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 28 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 34 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~15.6 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 34 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 47/100 (Weak)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 22/100 (At Risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 22.1 / 60 | 24 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 1 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 1 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 81/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 64.4 / 80 | 67,251 downloads/month across npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 52/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 12/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | not met | 0 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 100% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 1.4 / 13.5 | 1 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 71/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 21 / 42 | 50% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | met | 30 / 30 | 1/1 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | excluded | 0 / 15 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Ownership & stewardship — 41/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 7.2 / 25 | 9 followers of kvet |
| Track record | partial | 15.5 / 25 | 2 public repos, account ~15 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 7 package(s) on npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 34 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 28 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 77/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 68/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 3 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Documentation — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://kvet.github.io/queuert/ |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 13 topics |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 1/100 (Critical)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security policy (SECURITY.md) | not met | 0 / 30 | — |
| Dependabot config | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Dependency lockfiles | excluded | 0 / 25 | published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected |
| CodeQL workflow | not met | 0 / 20 | — |

## AI Readiness — 75/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | met | 15 / 15 | llms.txt served by the project website (https://kvet.github.io/queuert/llms.txt) |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 37/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | benchmarks/memory-footprint/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/processing-capacity/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/type-complexity/tsconfig.json, docs/tsconfig.json, examples/dashboard/tsconfig.json, examples/log-console/tsconfig.json, examples/log-pino/tsconfig.json, examples/log-winston/tsconfig.json, examples/notify-nats-nats/tsconfig.json, examples/notify-postgres-pg/tsconfig.json, examples/notify-postgres-postgres-js/tsconfig.json, examples/notify-redis-cluster-ioredis/tsconfig.json, examples/notify-redis-cluster-node-redis/tsconfig.json, examples/notify-redis-ioredis/tsconfig.json, examples/notify-redis-redis/tsconfig.json, examples/observability-otel/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-blockers/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-chain-awaiting/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-chain-deletion/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-chain-patterns/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-cleanup/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-error-handling/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-error-recovery/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-middleware/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-multiworker-prioritization/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-processing-modes/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-queries/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-scheduling/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-slices/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-timeouts/tsconfig.json, examples/showcase-workerless/tsconfig.json, examples/state-postgres-drizzle/tsconfig.json, examples/state-postgres-kysely/tsconfig.json, examples/state-postgres-multi-worker/tsconfig.json, examples/state-postgres-pg/tsconfig.json, examples/state-postgres-postgres-js/tsconfig.json, examples/state-postgres-prisma/tsconfig.json, examples/state-sqlite-better-sqlite3/tsconfig.json, examples/state-sqlite-bun/tsconfig.json, examples/state-sqlite-drizzle/tsconfig.json, examples/state-sqlite-kysely/tsconfig.json, examples/state-sqlite-node/tsconfig.json, examples/state-sqlite-prisma/tsconfig.json, examples/validation-arktype/tsconfig.json, examples/validation-typebox/tsconfig.json, examples/validation-valibot/tsconfig.json, examples/validation-zod/tsconfig.json, packages-internal/testcontainers/tsconfig.json, packages-internal/typed-sql/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/dashboard/src/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/dashboard/tsconfig.json, packages/nats/tsconfig.json, packages/otel/tsconfig.json, packages/postgres/tsconfig.json, packages/redis/tsconfig.json, packages/sqlite/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.7 / 55 | 2/428 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | excluded | 0 / 40 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| MCP server | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
- OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/kvet/queuert: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-15T14:05:29Z. Please include `8DC4:D6253:A5D5BF9:A1CF9D9:6AA950A7` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt