# ops-ai/Toggly.FeatureManagement — health index 81/100 (Excellent)

> Inspection of the public repository ops-ai/Toggly.FeatureManagement by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/ops-ai/Toggly.FeatureManagement
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/ops-ai/Toggly.FeatureManagement
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/ops-ai/Toggly.FeatureManagement/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/o/ops-ai/Toggly.FeatureManagement.svg
- Inspected: 2026-09-03
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 90/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 51/100 | Moderate |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 61/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 92/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 42/100 | Weak |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 85/100 | Excellent |

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Enables teams to release software faster and safer, and with better results. |
| Classification | library, mobile, web-ui, cli |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 5 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Created | 2021-12-04 |
| Last push | 2026-09-03 |
| Latest release | dotnet-sdk-v3.6.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 539 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | feature-flags |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/ops-ai/Toggly.FeatureManagement/toggly-go | v0.4.0 | — |
| npm | @ops-ai/toggly-eval | 2.0.0 | — |
| npm | @ops-ai/toggly-ga4-hook | 1.0.1 | 159 |
| npm | @ops-ai/toggly-hooks-types | 1.4.4 | 1,414 |
| npm | @ops-ai/toggly-local-gates | 1.0.2 | 834 |
| npm | @ops-ai/toggly-signed-defs | 1.2.4 | 901 |
| npm | @ops-ai/toggly-clarity-hook | 1.1.1 | 161 |
| npm | @ops-ai/toggly-appinsights-hook | 1.0.1 | 174 |

## Vitality — 90/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 83/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 19.4 / 36 | 28/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 539 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 52 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 0 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~0.6 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 0 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 51/100 (Moderate)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 10/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 9.8 / 60 | 5 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 2 watchers |

### Community health — 92/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 59/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 47.5 / 80 | 3,643 downloads/month across go, npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 61/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 24/100 (At Risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 1.2 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 94% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | partial | 4.1 / 13.5 | 3 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 59/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | met | 42 / 42 | 100% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 9.3 / 30 | 79/255 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 75/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 4.3 / 25 | 3 followers of ops-ai |
| Track record | partial | 20.8 / 25 | 15 public repos, account ~6 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 8 package(s) on go, npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 0 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 6 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 92/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 51 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, .golangci.yml, .rubocop.yml, eslint.config.js |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 16 / 20 | 24 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |

### Documentation — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://docs.toggly.io/sdks |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 1 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 42/100 (Weak)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 44/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | partial | 6.8 / 7.5 | binaries present in source code |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | partial | 2 / 2.5 | 24 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | not met | 0 / 10 | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 0.5 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1 |
| SAST | partial | 4 / 5 | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 423 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 33/100 (At Risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 2929 resolved dependencies against OSV; 2615 could not be assessed (no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list). This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | partial | 3.6 / 35 | 10 affected: @angular/compiler 21.1.5 (critical 9.0), @angular/core 21.1.5 (critical 9.0), google.golang.org/grpc v1.69.2 (critical 9.1), +7 more |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | excluded | 0 / 25 | transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| No advisories left outstanding | partial | 20.9 / 40 | 5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 525 days ago |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 85/100 (Excellent)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .cursor/rules/coverage-testing.mdc |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 73/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | partial | 12.6 / 18 | Toggly.CLI/Toggly.CLI.csproj, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Android/build.gradle.kts, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Android/toggly-android-core/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, .golangci.yml, .rubocop.yml, eslint.config.js |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | Toggly.FeatureManagement.Angular/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Astro/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Gatsby/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Javascript/feature_flags_toggly/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Next/nextjs-toggly-client/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Next/nextjs-toggly-core/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Next/nextjs-toggly-edge/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Next/nextjs-toggly-server/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Node/toggly-express/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Node/toggly-fastify/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Node/toggly-hono/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Node/toggly-koa/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Node/toggly-node-core/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Nuxt/nuxt-toggly-client/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Nuxt/nuxt-toggly-core/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Nuxt/nuxt-toggly-server/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Nuxt/nuxt-toggly/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Python/toggly-cache/src/toggly_cache/py.typed, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Python/toggly-django/src/toggly_django/py.typed, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Python/toggly-fastapi/src/toggly_fastapi/py.typed, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Python/toggly-flask/src/toggly_flask/py.typed, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Python/toggly/src/toggly/py.typed, Toggly.FeatureManagement.React/example/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.React/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.ReactNative/example-expo/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.ReactNative/libs/core/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.ReactNative/libs/react-native/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.ReactNative/libs/storage-async/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.ReactNative/libs/storage-mmkv/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Remix/remix-toggly-client/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Remix/remix-toggly-core/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Remix/remix-toggly-server/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Svelte/svelte-feature-flags-toggly/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Vue/vue-feature-flags-toggly/example/tsconfig.json, Toggly.FeatureManagement.Vue/vue-feature-flags-toggly/tsconfig.json, toggly-appinsights-hook/tsconfig.json, toggly-clarity-hook/tsconfig.json, toggly-docusaurus-edge-sdk/cloudflare/pages-function/tsconfig.json, toggly-docusaurus-edge-sdk/cloudflare/worker/tsconfig.json, toggly-docusaurus-edge-sdk/libs/core/tsconfig.json, toggly-docusaurus-edge-sdk/libs/docusaurus-plugin/tsconfig.json, toggly-eval/tsconfig.json, toggly-ga4-hook/tsconfig.json, toggly-hooks-types/tsconfig.json, toggly-local-gates/tsconfig.json, toggly-signed-defs/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 1 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.7 / 55 | 7/1280 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | Toggly.FeatureManagement.NET/Toggly.FeatureManagement/Metrics.proto, Toggly.FeatureManagement.NET/Toggly.FeatureManagement/Usage.proto, toggly-go/proto/metrics.proto, toggly-go/proto/usage.proto |
| MCP server | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to this kind of software |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | example, examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Resolved dependency list truncated to 3000 of 5544 packages (counts remain complete)
- deps.dev does not index npm:@ops-ai/toggly-eval@2.0.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt