# rancher/support-bundle-kit — health index 71/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository rancher/support-bundle-kit by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/rancher/support-bundle-kit
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/rancher/support-bundle-kit
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/rancher/support-bundle-kit/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/r/rancher/support-bundle-kit.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-17
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 79/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 46/100 | At risk |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 81/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 88/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 54/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 64/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | A toolkit to generate and analyze the support bundles for Kubernetes and Kubernetes-native applications |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 23 |
| Forks | 38 |
| Created | 2021-04-16 |
| Last push | 2026-07-17 |
| Latest release | v0.0.90 |
| Commits (last year) | 39 |
| Bus factor | 3 |
| Topics | kubernetes, k8s, cloud-native |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/rancher/support-bundle-kit | v0.0.90 | — |

## Vitality — 79/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 71/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 13.8 / 36 | 20/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | partial | 14.4 / 18 | 39 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | partial | 7 / 10 | 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7 |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 89 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 0 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~14.4 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 10 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 46/100 (At risk)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 42/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 21.8 / 60 | 23 stars |
| Forks | partial | 13.1 / 25 | 38 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 6.7 / 15 | 17 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 81/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 36 / 54 | 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 17.1 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 24% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 22 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 74/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 24 / 46.8 | 51% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 34.9 / 38.2 | 123/135 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | met | 15 / 15 | all changesets reviewed |

### Ownership & stewardship — 78/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 22.6 / 25 | 1,378 followers of rancher |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 589 public repos, account ~11 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 1 package(s) on go |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 23 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 90 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 88/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 4 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 3 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 54/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 54/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | all changesets reviewed |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | partial | 5.2 / 7.5 | 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 2 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | partial | 5.2 / 7.5 | 3 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 64/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 93/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | Makefile, vendor/github.com/distribution/reference/Makefile, vendor/github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3/Makefile, vendor/github.com/felixge/httpsnoop/Makefile, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/gogoproto/Makefile, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto/Makefile, vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/protoc-gen-gogo/descriptor/Makefile, vendor/github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheus/makefile, vendor/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/Makefile, vendor/github.com/munnerz/goautoneg/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pelletier/go-toml/Makefile, vendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/github.com/prometheus/procfs/Makefile, vendor/github.com/spf13/cast/Makefile, vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/Makefile, vendor/github.com/spf13/viper/Makefile, vendor/go.etcd.io/bbolt/Makefile, vendor/go.etcd.io/raft/v3/Makefile, vendor/go.opencensus.io/Makefile, vendor/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/multierr/Makefile, vendor/go.uber.org/zap/Makefile, vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/Makefile, vendor/gopkg.in/ini.v1/Makefile, vendor/sigs.k8s.io/json/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | Go (statically typed) |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 4 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Go (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | met | 55 / 55 | 0/61 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/gogoproto/gogo.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/extensions/extension.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv2/OpenAPIv2.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/OpenAPIv3.proto, vendor/github.com/google/gnostic-models/openapiv3/annotations.proto, vendor/github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/annotations.proto, vendor/github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/openapiv2.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3/authpb/auth.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3/etcdserverpb/etcdserver.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3/etcdserverpb/raft_internal.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3/etcdserverpb/rpc.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3/membershippb/membership.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3/mvccpb/kv.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3/versionpb/version.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdserver/api/snap/snappb/snap.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdserver/api/v3election/v3electionpb/v3election.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/etcdserver/api/v3lock/v3lockpb/v3lock.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/lease/leasepb/lease.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/etcd/server/v3/storage/wal/walpb/record.proto, vendor/go.etcd.io/raft/v3/raftpb/raft.proto, vendor/google.golang.org/protobuf/types/gofeaturespb/go_features.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admission/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admission/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apidiscovery/v2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apidiscovery/v2beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apiserverinternal/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apps/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apps/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/apps/v1beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authentication/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authentication/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authentication/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authorization/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/authorization/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v2beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v2beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/batch/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/batch/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/certificates/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/certificates/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/certificates/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/coordination/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/coordination/v1alpha2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/coordination/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/core/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/discovery/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/discovery/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/events/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/events/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/extensions/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/flowcontrol/v1beta3/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/imagepolicy/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/networking/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/networking/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/node/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/node/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/node/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/rbac/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/rbac/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/rbac/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/resource/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/resource/v1alpha3/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/resource/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/resource/v1beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/scheduling/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/scheduling/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/scheduling/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storage/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storage/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storage/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/api/storagemigration/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver/pkg/apis/apiextensions/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver/pkg/apis/apiextensions/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/testapigroup/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/runtime/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/runtime/schema/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/intstr/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/apis/audit/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/storage/value/encrypt/envelope/kmsv2/v2/api.proto, vendor/k8s.io/externaljwt/apis/v1/api.proto, vendor/k8s.io/kms/apis/v1beta1/api.proto, vendor/k8s.io/kms/apis/v2/api.proto, vendor/k8s.io/kube-aggregator/pkg/apis/apiregistration/v1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/kube-aggregator/pkg/apis/apiregistration/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/metrics/pkg/apis/custom_metrics/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/metrics/pkg/apis/custom_metrics/v1beta2/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/metrics/pkg/apis/external_metrics/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/metrics/pkg/apis/metrics/v1alpha1/generated.proto, vendor/k8s.io/metrics/pkg/apis/metrics/v1beta1/generated.proto, vendor/sigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client/proto/client/client.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt