# redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins — health index 93/100 (Exceptional)

> Inspection of the public repository redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/r/redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins.svg
- Inspected: 2026-10-21
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 92/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 63/100 | Moderate |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 85/100 | Excellent |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 88/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 55/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 95/100 | Exceptional |

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Red Hat Developer Hub plugins |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 49 |
| Forks | 121 |
| Created | 2024-10-03 |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 |
| Latest release | cost-management-v2.1.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 2,624 |
| Bus factor | 6 |
| Topics | rhdh |

## Vitality — 92/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 99/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 35.3 / 36 | 51/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 2624 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 82/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 5 releases published |
| Release recency | partial | 27 / 36 | latest release 169 days ago |
| Release cadence | partial | 19.8 / 27 | a release every ~76.6 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 0 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 63/100 (Moderate)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 51/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 27.3 / 60 | 49 stars |
| Forks | partial | 17.3 / 25 | 121 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 6.7 / 15 | 17 watchers |

### Community health — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 85/100 (Excellent)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 88/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 48.6 / 54 | 6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 16 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 29% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 85 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 31 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 89/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 35.9 / 42 | 85% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 26.5 / 30 | 4364/4947 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | met | 15 / 15 | all changesets reviewed |

### Ownership & stewardship — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 21.8 / 25 | 1,063 followers of redhat-developer |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 286 public repos, account ~11 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 88/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 24 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/adoption-insights/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/ai-integrations/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/app-defaults/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/augment/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/boost/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/bulk-import/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/cost-management/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/dcm/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/extensions/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/global-header/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/homepage/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/install-dynamic-plugins/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/intelligent-assistant/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/konflux/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/mcp-integrations/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/orchestrator/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/quickstart/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/repo-tools/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/scorecard/package.json ("prettier") |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 1 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 55/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 55/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | all changesets reviewed |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 31 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | not met | 0 / 10 | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 4 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool is run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 569 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 95/100 (Exceptional)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .cursor/rules/legacy-nfs-migration-e2e.mdc, .fullsend/AGENTS.md, AGENTS.md, workspaces/ai-integrations/AGENTS.md, workspaces/ai-integrations/CLAUDE.md, workspaces/boost/AGENTS.md, workspaces/cost-management/AGENTS.md, workspaces/cost-management/CLAUDE.md, workspaces/intelligent-assistant/AGENTS.md, workspaces/intelligent-assistant/CLAUDE.md, workspaces/mcp-integrations/AGENTS.md, workspaces/mcp-integrations/CLAUDE.md, workspaces/scorecard/AGENTS.md, workspaces/x2a/AGENTS.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 78 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 98/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | workspaces/extensions/Makefile, workspaces/orchestrator/Makefile, workspaces/theme/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/adoption-insights/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/ai-integrations/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/app-defaults/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/augment/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/boost/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/bulk-import/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/cost-management/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/dcm/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/extensions/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/global-header/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/homepage/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/install-dynamic-plugins/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/intelligent-assistant/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/konflux/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/mcp-integrations/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/orchestrator/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/quickstart/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/repo-tools/package.json ("prettier"), workspaces/scorecard/package.json ("prettier") |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | workspaces/adoption-insights/tsconfig.json, workspaces/ai-integrations/plugins/catalog-backend-module-skills-catalog-provider/tsconfig.json, workspaces/ai-integrations/tsconfig.json, workspaces/app-defaults/tsconfig.json, workspaces/augment/tsconfig.json, workspaces/boost/tsconfig.json, workspaces/bulk-import/tsconfig.json, workspaces/cost-management/tsconfig.json, workspaces/dcm/tsconfig.json, workspaces/extensions/tsconfig.json, workspaces/global-header/tsconfig.json, workspaces/homepage/tsconfig.json, workspaces/install-dynamic-plugins/packages/install-dynamic-plugins/tsconfig.json, workspaces/install-dynamic-plugins/tsconfig.json, workspaces/intelligent-assistant/tsconfig.json, workspaces/konflux/tsconfig.json, workspaces/mcp-integrations/tsconfig.json, workspaces/orchestrator/plugins/custom-authentication-provider-module-backend/tsconfig.json, workspaces/orchestrator/plugins/custom-authentication-provider-module/tsconfig.json, workspaces/orchestrator/tsconfig.json, workspaces/quickstart/tsconfig.json, workspaces/repo-tools/packages/cli/src/lib/workspaces/templates/workspace/tsconfig.json, workspaces/repo-tools/tsconfig.json, workspaces/scorecard/tsconfig.json, workspaces/theme/tsconfig.json, workspaces/translations/packages/cli/tsconfig.json, workspaces/translations/tsconfig.json, workspaces/x2a/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | met | 10 / 10 | 31 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| Automated maintenance | met | 8 / 8 | 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 8 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.9 / 55 | 11/5585 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | workspaces/bulk-import/plugins/bulk-import-backend/src/schema/openapi.yaml, workspaces/cost-management/plugins/cost-management-common/src/schema/openapi.yaml, workspaces/orchestrator/plugins/orchestrator-common/src/openapi/openapi.yaml, workspaces/x2a/plugins/x2a-backend/src/schema/openapi.yaml |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)
- Could not fetch npm package '@internal/mcp-integrations' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM request failed: GitHub API error 500 for /repos/redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins/dependency-graph/sbom

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt