# reown-com/appkit — health index 80/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository reown-com/appkit by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/reown-com/appkit
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/reown-com/appkit
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/reown-com/appkit/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/r/reown-com/appkit.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-18
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.13.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 96/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 84/100 | Good |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 79/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 76/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 60/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 70/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | The full stack toolkit to build onchain app UX |
| Homepage | https://reown.com/appkit |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| Stars | 5,431 |
| Forks | 1,632 |
| Created | 2018-03-29 |
| Last push | 2026-07-15 |
| Latest release | @reown/appkit-controllers@1.8.22 |
| Commits (last year) | 399 |
| Bus factor | 4 |
| Topics | walletconnect, plugin, widget, ethereum, wallet, integration, dapps, react, prod, team-appkit |

## Vitality — 96/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 94/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 3 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 30.5 / 36 | 44/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 399 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 11 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~0 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 84/100 (Good)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 95/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | met | 60 / 60 | 5,431 stars |
| Forks | met | 25 / 25 | 1,632 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 10.4 / 15 | 74 watchers |

### Community health — 71/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 79/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 43.2 / 54 | 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 18.4 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 18% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 100 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 30 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 84/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 46.3 / 46.8 | 99% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 27.7 / 38.2 | 2529/3492 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 10.5 / 15 | Found 21/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 66/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 21.1 / 25 | 864 followers of reown-com |
| Track record | partial | 14.4 / 25 | 28 public repos, account ~1 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 76/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 84/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 15 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.mjs |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 65/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://reown.com/appkit |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 10 topics |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 60/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 60/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 3.8 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 5.2 / 7.5 | Found 21/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 30 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool is run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 246 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 70/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .cursor/rules/appkit-apps.mdc, .cursor/rules/appkit-examples.mdc, .cursor/rules/appkit-monorepo.mdc, .cursor/rules/appkit-packages.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 66/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.mjs |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | apps/browser-extension/tsconfig.json, apps/demo/tsconfig.json, apps/gallery/tsconfig.json, apps/laboratory/tsconfig.json, apps/pay-test-exchange/tsconfig.json, examples/next-ak-basic-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/next-ak-basic-sign-client-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/next-ak-basic-up-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/next-appkit-headless/tsconfig.json, examples/next-bitcoin-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/next-ep-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/next-ethers-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/next-wagmi-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/next-wagmi-solana-bitcoin-app-router/tsconfig.json, examples/nuxt-wagmi-solana-bitcoin/server/tsconfig.json, examples/nuxt-wagmi-solana-bitcoin/tsconfig.json, examples/nuxt-wagmi/server/tsconfig.json, examples/nuxt-wagmi/tsconfig.json, examples/parcel/tsconfig.json, examples/react-ak-basic-sign-client/tsconfig.json, examples/react-ak-basic-up/tsconfig.json, examples/react-ak-basic/tsconfig.json, examples/react-ep/tsconfig.json, examples/react-ethers/tsconfig.json, examples/react-ethers5/tsconfig.json, examples/react-reown-authentication/tsconfig.json, examples/react-solana/tsconfig.json, examples/react-wagmi/tsconfig.json, examples/sveltekit-4-wagmi/tsconfig.json, examples/sveltekit-ethers/tsconfig.json, examples/sveltekit-wagmi/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-ak-basic-sign-client/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-ak-basic-up/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-ak-basic/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-ep/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-ethers-solana/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-ethers5/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-reown-authentication/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-solana/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-wagmi-solana/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-wagmi/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/bitcoin/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/ethers/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/ethers5/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/polkadot/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/solana/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/ton/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/tron/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/wagmi/tsconfig.json, packages/appkit-utils/tsconfig.json, packages/appkit/tsconfig.json, packages/cdn/tsconfig.json, packages/common/tsconfig.json, packages/controllers/tsconfig.json, packages/core-legacy/tsconfig.json, packages/experimental/tsconfig.json, packages/pay/tsconfig.json, packages/polyfills/tsconfig.json, packages/scaffold-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/siwe/tsconfig.json, packages/siwx/tsconfig.json, packages/testing/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/universal-connector/tsconfig.json, packages/wallet-button/tsconfig.json, packages/wallet/tsconfig.json, services/id-allocation-service/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.9 / 55 | 3/1995 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Resolved dependency list truncated to 2000 of 3381 packages (counts remain complete)

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt