# rstackjs/rspack-resolver — health index 75/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository rstackjs/rspack-resolver by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/rstackjs/rspack-resolver
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/rstackjs/rspack-resolver
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/rstackjs/rspack-resolver/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/r/rstackjs/rspack-resolver.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-14
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 93/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 70/100 | Good |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 68/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 65/100 | Moderate |
| Security | 16% | 81/100 | Good |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 55/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Rust Port of enhanced-resolve |
| Primary language | Rust |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 41 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Created | 2024-07-07 |
| Last push | 2026-07-07 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 |
| Commits (last year) | 147 |
| Bus factor | 1 |
| Topics | resolver, rspack |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates | rspack_resolver | 0.9.4 | 30,961 |
| npm | benches | 0.0.0 | 22 |
| npm | @rspack/resolver | 0.5.4 | 1,517,326 |
| npm | name | 0.0.2 | 3,593 |

## Vitality — 93/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 88/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 7 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 23.5 / 36 | 34/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 147 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 30 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 7 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~25.6 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 70/100 (Good)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 39/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 26 / 60 | 41 stars |
| Forks | partial | 8 / 25 | 10 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 5 / 15 | 9 watchers |

### Community health — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | met | 80 / 80 | 1,548,287 downloads/month across crates, npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 68/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 43/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 10.2 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 55% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 29 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 27 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 74/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 33 / 46.8 | 71% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 31.9 / 38.2 | 211/253 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 9 / 15 | Found 15/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 66/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 16.1 / 25 | 175 followers of rstackjs |
| Track record | partial | 19.6 / 25 | 112 public repos, account ~3 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 2 package(s) on crates, npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 7 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 34 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 65/100 (Moderate)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 68/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 8 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | not met | 0 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 2 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 81/100 (Good)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 81/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 3.8 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 4.5 / 7.5 | Found 15/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 27 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | met | 5 / 5 | project is fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 4.5 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |
| SAST | partial | 4 / 5 | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 254 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 55/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 85/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | justfile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | examples/tsconfig_references/app/tsconfig.json, examples/tsconfig_references/component/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/base/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-base/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-circular/a/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-circular/b/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-deep-baseurl/packages/app/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-deep-baseurl/packages/lib/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-deep-baseurl/tsconfig-base/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-npm/node_modules/react/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-npm/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-pkg-entry/node_modules/@my-tsconfig/base/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/extends-pkg-entry/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/jsonc-comments/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/malformed-json/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/references-project/packages/app/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/references-project/packages/shared/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/references-project/packages/utils/tsconfig.json, fixtures/enhanced_resolve/test/fixtures/tsconfig-paths/references-project/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/builtins/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/empty/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/exports/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/extends-extension/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/extends-extensionless/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/extends-multiple/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/extends-not-found/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/extends-paths/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/field/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/index/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/project_references/app/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/project_references/project_b/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/project_references/project_c/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/references-cycle/a/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/references-cycle/b/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/references-extends/app/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/references-extends/project_b/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/references-transitive/app/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/references-transitive/project_b/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/references-transitive/project_c/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/scoped-pkg-fallthrough/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/suffixes/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/cases/trailing-comma/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/nested/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/node_modules/tsconfig-index/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/node_modules/tsconfig-not-used/tsconfig.json, fixtures/tsconfig/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | partial | 9 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Rust (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.5 / 55 | 2/236 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- npm package 'benches' points at a different repository (http://github.com/zerious/benches.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Could not fetch crates package 'resolver_fuzz' from its registry
- Could not fetch crates package 'rspack_napi_resolver' from its registry
- npm package 'name' points at a different repository (git://github.com/Gozala/name.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Resolved dependency list truncated to 2000 of 2658 packages (counts remain complete)

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt