# ruvnet/ruvector — health index 75/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository ruvnet/ruvector by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/ruvnet/ruvector
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/ruvnet/ruvector
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/ruvnet/ruvector/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/r/ruvnet/ruvector.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-13
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.9.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 92/100 | Excellent |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 71/100 | Good |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 69/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 87/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 51/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 87/100 | Excellent |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | RuVector is a High Performance, Real-Time, Self-Learning Ai, Vector GNN, Memory DB built in Rust. |
| Homepage | https://Cognitum.One/RuVector |
| Primary language | Rust |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 4,351 |
| Forks | 574 |
| Created | 2025-11-19 |
| Last push | 2026-07-13 |
| Latest release | ruvector-core-v2.3.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 2,837 |
| Bus factor | 2 |
| Topics | ai, ai-ocr, attention-mechanism, gnn, gnn-model, gnns, graph, graph-neural-networks, llm-inference, low-latency, mincut, neo4j, ocr, onnx, rust, vector, wasm |

## Vitality — 92/100 (Excellent)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 87/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 22.8 / 36 | 33/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 2837 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 38 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 1 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~8.1 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 71/100 (Good)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 59 / 60 | 4,351 stars |
| Forks | partial | 23 / 25 | 574 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 8.3 / 15 | 32 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 69/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 25.2 / 54 | 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 11.7 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 48% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 18 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 74/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 34.3 / 46.8 | 73% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 35.1 / 38.2 | 309/337 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 4.5 / 15 | Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | met | 25 / 25 | 10,225 followers of ruvnet |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 197 public repos, account ~13 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 87/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 78/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 45 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 14 / 20 | 11 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7 |

### Documentation — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://Cognitum.One/RuVector |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | met | 10 / 10 | 17 topics |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 51/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 51/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | not met | 0 / 7.5 | binaries present in source code |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 0.8 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | partial | 1.8 / 2.5 | 11 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 2.2 / 7.5 | Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | met | 5 / 5 | project is fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 75 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 87/100 (Excellent)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .claude/agents/goal/agent.md, .claude/agents/reasoning/agent.md, .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.md, CLAUDE.md, examples/vibecast-7sense/CLAUDE.md, harnesses/timesfm-harness/CLAUDE.md, ui/ruvocal/CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 86/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | crates/ruvector-postgres/Makefile, crates/ruvix/aarch64-boot/Makefile, crates/rvm/Makefile, examples/ruvLLM/esp32-flash/Makefile, examples/scipix/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | crates/ruvector-attention-wasm/tsconfig.json, crates/rvlite/examples/dashboard/tsconfig.json, examples/decompiler-dashboard/tsconfig.json, examples/delta-behavior/wasm/tsconfig.json, examples/dragnes/.svelte-kit/tsconfig.json, examples/dragnes/tsconfig.json, examples/edge-net/dashboard/tsconfig.json, examples/edge-net/sim/tsconfig.json, examples/edge-net/tests/tsconfig.json, examples/rvf/dashboard/tsconfig.json, examples/scipix/web/tsconfig.json, harnesses/timesfm-harness/tsconfig.json, npm/core/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/agentic-integration/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/agentic-synth-examples/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/agentic-synth/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/burst-scaling/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/cli/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/cognitum-gate-wasm/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/core/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/graph-data-generator/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/node/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ospipe/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/pi-brain/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/postgres-cli/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/raft/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/replication/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/rudag/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ruvbot/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ruvector-extensions/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ruvector-wasm-unified/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ruvector/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ruvllm-cli/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ruvllm-wasm/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/ruvllm/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/rvf-mcp-server/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/rvf-solver/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/rvf/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/rvlite/tsconfig.json, npm/packages/scipix/tsconfig.json, npm/tsconfig.json, npm/wasm/tsconfig.json, ui/ruvocal/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Rust (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.5 / 55 | 64/6969 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | crates/ruvector-hailo-cluster/proto/embedding.proto, examples/exo-ai-2025/docs/OPENAPI.yaml |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | demos, examples |

## Collection warnings

- Could not fetch npm package '@ruvector/benchmarks' from its registry

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt