# spaskob/cockroach — health index 11/100 (Critical)

> Inspection of the public repository spaskob/cockroach by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 11 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/spaskob/cockroach
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/spaskob/cockroach
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/spaskob/cockroach/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/s/spaskob/cockroach.svg
- Inspected: 2026-09-20
- Methodology: metrics 2.10.0, report schema 0.34.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 20/100 | At Risk |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 9/100 | Critical |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 51/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 43/100 | Weak |
| Security | 16% | 34/100 | At Risk |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 63/100 | Moderate |

The weighted overall 34 is calibrated to 28 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). Abandonment Policy applies a 40% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it a ceiling of 19.

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | CockroachDB - the open source, cloud-native SQL database. |
| Classification | library, network-service, web-ui, cli |
| Homepage | https://www.cockroachlabs.com |
| Primary language | Go |
| Stars | 0 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Created | 2019-07-15 |
| Last push | 2021-04-01 |
| Latest release | v19.1.3 |
| Commits (last year) | 0 |
| Bus factor | 7 |
| Archived | yes — the repository is no longer maintained on GitHub |
| Fork | yes |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach | v19.2.12+incompatible | — |
| npm | ui | 0.2.4 | 23,342 |

## Vitality — 20/100 (At Risk)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | not met | 0 / 36 | last push 1997 days ago |
| Commit cadence | not met | 0 / 36 | 0/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | not met | 0 / 18 | 0 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | not met | 0 / 10 | project is archived |

### Release discipline — 48/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | partial | 16.2 / 27 | 57 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| Release recency | not met | 0 / 36 | latest release 2635 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~10 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 40/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | partial | 40 / 100 | the repository is archived on GitHub |

## Community & Adoption — 9/100 (Critical)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 0 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 19/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | not met | 0 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 51/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 95/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 51.3 / 54 | 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 20.3 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 10% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 99 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 23 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 42 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 30 | no decided pull requests or no data |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 47/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 8.7 / 25 | 15 followers of spaskob |
| Track record | partial | 18.6 / 25 | 7 public repos, account ~14 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 43/100 (Weak)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 38/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | not met | 0 / 24 | — |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | not met | 0 / 16 | — |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | not met | 0 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://www.cockroachlabs.com |
| Repository description | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 34/100 (At Risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 17/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 23 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | excluded | 0 / 10 | no workflows found |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | not met | 0 / 7.5 | project is archived |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | no SAST tool detected |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | No tokens found |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 439 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:ui@0.2.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | met | 35 / 35 | no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | met | 25 / 25 | no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| No advisories left outstanding | excluded | 0 / 40 | no advisory carries a publication date |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 63/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 40/100 (Weak)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 65 of 67 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 61/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | Makefile, build/archive/contents/Makefile, pkg/Makefile, pkg/acceptance/testdata/c/Makefile, pkg/internal/sqlsmith/Makefile, pkg/ui/Makefile, pkg/ui/cypress/Makefile, scripts/release-notes/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | not met | 0 / 11 | — |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | pkg/ui/cypress/tsconfig.json, pkg/ui/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 98/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Go (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 53.2 / 55 | 141/4278 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | pkg/acceptance/cluster/testconfig.proto, pkg/blobs/blobspb/blobs.proto, pkg/build/info.proto, pkg/ccl/backupccl/backup.proto, pkg/ccl/baseccl/encryption_options.proto, pkg/ccl/storageccl/engineccl/enginepbccl/key_registry.proto, pkg/ccl/storageccl/engineccl/enginepbccl/stats.proto, pkg/ccl/utilccl/licenseccl/license.proto, pkg/cli/systembench/systembenchpb/ping.proto, pkg/clusterversion/cluster_version.proto, pkg/config/system.proto, pkg/config/zonepb/zone.proto, pkg/geo/geoindex/config.proto, pkg/geo/geopb/geopb.proto, pkg/gossip/gossip.proto, pkg/jobs/jobspb/jobs.proto, pkg/jobs/jobspb/schedule.proto, pkg/kv/kvnemesis/operations.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/api.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/closedts/ctpb/entry.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/closedts/ctpb/service.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/concurrency/lock/locking.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/kvserverpb/lease_status.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/kvserverpb/liveness.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/kvserverpb/log.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/kvserverpb/proposer_kv.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/kvserverpb/state.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/protectedts/ptpb/protectedts.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/protectedts/ptstorage/storage.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/raft.proto, pkg/kv/kvserver/storage_services.proto, pkg/roachpb/api.proto, pkg/roachpb/app_stats.proto, pkg/roachpb/data.proto, pkg/roachpb/errors.proto, pkg/roachpb/internal.proto, pkg/roachpb/internal_raft.proto, pkg/roachpb/io-formats.proto, pkg/roachpb/metadata.proto, pkg/rpc/heartbeat.proto, pkg/server/diagnosticspb/diagnostics.proto, pkg/server/serverpb/admin.proto, pkg/server/serverpb/authentication.proto, pkg/server/serverpb/init.proto, pkg/server/serverpb/status.proto, pkg/server/status/statuspb/status.proto, pkg/sql/catalog/descpb/encoded_datum.proto, pkg/sql/catalog/descpb/join_type.proto, pkg/sql/catalog/descpb/locking.proto, pkg/sql/catalog/descpb/privilege.proto, pkg/sql/catalog/descpb/structured.proto, pkg/sql/catalog/descpb/tenant.proto, pkg/sql/colexec/execpb/stats.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/api.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/data.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/processors.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/processors_base.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/processors_bulk_io.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/processors_changefeeds.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/processors_sql.proto, pkg/sql/execinfrapb/processors_table_stats.proto, pkg/sql/flowinfra/stats.proto, pkg/sql/opt/invertedexpr/span_expression.proto, pkg/sql/pgwire/pgerror/errors.proto, pkg/sql/rowexec/stats.proto, pkg/sql/rowflow/stats.proto, pkg/sql/stats/histogram.proto, pkg/sql/stats/table_statistic.proto, pkg/sql/types/types.proto, pkg/sqlmigrations/leasemanager/lease.proto, pkg/storage/enginepb/engine.proto, pkg/storage/enginepb/file_registry.proto, pkg/storage/enginepb/mvcc.proto, pkg/storage/enginepb/mvcc3.proto, pkg/storage/enginepb/rocksdb.proto, pkg/ts/catalog/chart_catalog.proto, pkg/ts/tspb/timeseries.proto, pkg/util/hlc/legacy_timestamp.proto, pkg/util/hlc/timestamp.proto, pkg/util/log/log.proto, pkg/util/metric/metric.proto, pkg/util/protoutil/clone.proto, pkg/util/tracing/recorded_span.proto, pkg/util/unresolved_addr.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples |

## Collection warnings

- Community profile unavailable
- go package 'github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach' points at a different repository (https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- npm package 'ui' points at a different repository (https://github.com/marcuswestin/ui.js); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt