# st-chain/da-cosmos-sdk — health index 56/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository st-chain/da-cosmos-sdk by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/st-chain/da-cosmos-sdk
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/st-chain/da-cosmos-sdk
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/st-chain/da-cosmos-sdk/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/s/st-chain/da-cosmos-sdk.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-17
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 54/100 | Moderate |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 46/100 | At risk |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 60/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 74/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 44/100 | At risk |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 56/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | These changes are made based on the cosmos-sdk modified by the celestia team, so they are not consistent with the original cosmos sdk. |
| Primary language | Go |
| Stars | 0 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Created | 2025-02-17 |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 |
| Latest release | v1.32.3-sdk-v0.52.3 |
| Commits (last year) | 0 |
| Bus factor | 7 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/container | v1.0.0-alpha.4 | — |
| go | cosmossdk.io/core | v1.1.0 | — |
| go | github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/db | v1.0.0-beta.1 | — |
| npm | docs | 0.4.0 | 4,090 |
| go | cosmossdk.io/errors | v1.1.0 | — |
| go | github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk | v0.54.3 | — |
| go | cosmossdk.io/math | v1.5.3 | — |
| go | github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/orm | v1.0.0-beta.3 | — |

## Vitality — 54/100 (Moderate)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 36/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 2 days ago |
| Commit cadence | not met | 0 / 36 | 0/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | not met | 0 / 18 | 0 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | not met | 0 / 10 | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |

### Release discipline — 80/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | partial | 16.2 / 27 | 7 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 78 days ago |
| Release cadence | partial | 19.8 / 27 | a release every ~72.8 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 46/100 (At risk)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 0 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | partial | 16.9 / 22.5 | license file present, not a recognized license |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

### Ecosystem adoption (downloads) — 60/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly downloads | partial | 48.2 / 80 | 4,090 downloads/month across go, npm |
| Registry dependents | excluded | 0 / 20 | not reported by this ecosystem |

## Sustainability & Governance — 60/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 95/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 51.3 / 54 | 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 20 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 11% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 100 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 39 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 46.8 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | not met | 0 / 38.2 | 0/4 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 47/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 5 / 25 | 4 followers of st-chain |
| Track record | partial | 11.9 / 25 | 9 public repos, account ~2 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 4 package(s) on go, npm |
| Publish recency | met | 35 / 35 | latest publish 40 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 34 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 74/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 80/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 17 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .golangci.yml |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 65/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 44/100 (At risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 44/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 39 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | partial | 2.2 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool detected: CodeQL |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 209 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 56/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 86/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | Makefile, client/v2/Makefile, container/Makefile, contrib/devtools/Makefile, contrib/images/Makefile, core/Makefile, orm/Makefile, store/tools/ics23/Makefile, store/tools/ics23/iavl/Makefile, store/tools/ics23/smt/Makefile, store/tools/ics23/tendermint/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .golangci.yml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | Go (statically typed) |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Go (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 53.8 / 55 | 40/1826 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml, client/v2/internal/testpb/query.proto, core/internal/testpb/test.proto, orm/internal/testpb/bank.proto, orm/internal/testpb/test_schema.proto, proto/cosmos/app/module/v1alpha1/module.proto, proto/cosmos/app/v1alpha1/config.proto, proto/cosmos/app/v1alpha1/module.proto, proto/cosmos/app/v1alpha1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/auth/v1beta1/auth.proto, proto/cosmos/auth/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/auth/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/authz/v1beta1/authz.proto, proto/cosmos/authz/v1beta1/event.proto, proto/cosmos/authz/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/authz/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/authz/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/bank/v1beta1/authz.proto, proto/cosmos/bank/v1beta1/bank.proto, proto/cosmos/bank/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/bank/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/bank/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.proto, proto/cosmos/base/kv/v1beta1/kv.proto, proto/cosmos/base/node/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/base/query/v1beta1/pagination.proto, proto/cosmos/base/reflection/v1beta1/reflection.proto, proto/cosmos/base/reflection/v2alpha1/reflection.proto, proto/cosmos/base/snapshots/v1beta1/snapshot.proto, proto/cosmos/base/store/v1beta1/commit_info.proto, proto/cosmos/base/store/v1beta1/listening.proto, proto/cosmos/base/tendermint/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/base/tendermint/v1beta1/types.proto, proto/cosmos/base/v1beta1/coin.proto, proto/cosmos/capability/v1beta1/capability.proto, proto/cosmos/capability/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/crisis/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/crisis/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/crypto/ed25519/keys.proto, proto/cosmos/crypto/hd/v1/hd.proto, proto/cosmos/crypto/keyring/v1/record.proto, proto/cosmos/crypto/multisig/keys.proto, proto/cosmos/crypto/multisig/v1beta1/multisig.proto, proto/cosmos/crypto/secp256k1/keys.proto, proto/cosmos/crypto/secp256r1/keys.proto, proto/cosmos/distribution/v1beta1/distribution.proto, proto/cosmos/distribution/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/distribution/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/distribution/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/evidence/v1beta1/evidence.proto, proto/cosmos/evidence/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/evidence/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/evidence/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/feegrant.proto, proto/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/genutil/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1beta1/gov.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/gov/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/group/v1/events.proto, proto/cosmos/group/v1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/group/v1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/group/v1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/group/v1/types.proto, proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.proto, proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto, proto/cosmos/nft/v1beta1/event.proto, proto/cosmos/nft/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/nft/v1beta1/nft.proto, proto/cosmos/nft/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/nft/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/orm/module/v1alpha1/module.proto, proto/cosmos/orm/v1/orm.proto, proto/cosmos/orm/v1alpha1/schema.proto, proto/cosmos/params/v1beta1/params.proto, proto/cosmos/params/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/slashing/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/slashing/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/slashing/v1beta1/slashing.proto, proto/cosmos/slashing/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/authz.proto, proto/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/genesis.proto, proto/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/staking.proto, proto/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/tx/signing/v1beta1/signing.proto, proto/cosmos/tx/v1beta1/service.proto, proto/cosmos/tx/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/upgrade/v1beta1/query.proto, proto/cosmos/upgrade/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/upgrade/v1beta1/upgrade.proto, proto/cosmos/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto, proto/cosmos/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto, proto/tendermint/abci/types.proto, proto/tendermint/crypto/keys.proto, proto/tendermint/crypto/proof.proto, proto/tendermint/libs/bits/types.proto, proto/tendermint/p2p/types.proto, proto/tendermint/types/block.proto, proto/tendermint/types/evidence.proto, proto/tendermint/types/params.proto, proto/tendermint/types/types.proto, proto/tendermint/types/validator.proto, proto/tendermint/version/types.proto, testutil/testdata/query.proto, testutil/testdata/testdata.proto, testutil/testdata/tx.proto, testutil/testdata/unknonwnproto.proto, third_party/proto/google/protobuf/any.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | not met | 0 / 40 | — |

## Collection warnings

- go package 'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/container' points at a different repository (https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- go package 'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/db' points at a different repository (https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- go package 'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk' points at a different repository (https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- go package 'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/orm' points at a different repository (https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt