# studio-jami/jami-studio — health index 47/100 (At risk)

> Inspection of the public repository studio-jami/jami-studio by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the At risk band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/studio-jami/jami-studio
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/studio-jami/jami-studio
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/studio-jami/jami-studio/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/s/studio-jami/jami-studio.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-21
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.25.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 41/100 | At risk |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 24/100 | Critical |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 51/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 85/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 29/100 | Critical |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 81/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Jami Studio framework monorepo standalone reset |
| Homepage | https://www.jami.studio |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 0 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Created | 2026-07-07 |
| Last push | 2026-07-19 |
| Commits (last year) | 3,111 |
| Bus factor | 1 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @agent-native/core | 0.114.16 | 97,638 |
| npm | @agent-native/skills | 0.2.382 | 52,957 |
| npm | @agent-native/toolkit | 0.8.2 | 14,533 |
| npm | @agent-native/dispatch | 0.15.8 | 10,418 |
| npm | @agent-native/pinpoint | 0.1.15 | 1,157 |
| npm | @agent-native/scheduling | 0.1.30 | 2,946 |

## Vitality — 41/100 (At risk)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 67/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 2 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 13.2 / 36 | 19/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 3111 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | not met | 0 / 10 | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |

### Release discipline — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | not met | 0 / 27 | no releases published |
| Release recency | not met | 0 / 36 | no releases |
| Release cadence | not met | 0 / 27 | no releases |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 24/100 (Critical)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 1/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 0 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 0 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 0 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 51/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 42/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 9 / 54 | 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 9.4 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 58% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 37 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 6 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 72/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | excluded | 0 / 46.8 | no issues or no data |
| PR acceptance | met | 38.2 / 38.2 | 9/9 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 41/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 5 / 25 | 4 followers of studio-jami |
| Track record | partial | 6.4 / 25 | 6 public repos, account ~0 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 85/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 88/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 2 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.mjs |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://www.jami.studio |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | not met | 0 / 10 | — |

## Security — 29/100 (Critical)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 23/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | partial | 6 / 7.5 | binaries present in source code |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 6 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | not met | 0 / 7.5 | no update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | not met | 0 / 7.5 | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | no SAST tool detected |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 42 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 55/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1779 resolved dependencies against OSV; 2254 could not be assessed (no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list). This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | partial | 8.5 / 35 | 2 affected: h3 catalog: (high 8.9), sharp 0.34.5 (high 7.3) |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | excluded | 0 / 25 | transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| No advisories left outstanding | partial | 32.7 / 40 | 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 187 days ago |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 81/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/core/docs/AGENTS.md, packages/core/src/templates/default/AGENTS.md, packages/core/src/templates/default/CLAUDE.md, packages/core/src/templates/headless/AGENTS.md, packages/core/src/templates/workspace-core/AGENTS.md, packages/core/src/templates/workspace-core/CLAUDE.md, packages/core/src/templates/workspace-root/AGENTS.md, registry/agent-native-app/AGENTS.md, templates/analytics/AGENTS.md, templates/analytics/CLAUDE.md, templates/assets/AGENTS.md, templates/assets/CLAUDE.md, templates/brain/AGENTS.md, templates/brain/CLAUDE.md, templates/calendar/AGENTS.md, templates/calendar/CLAUDE.md, templates/chat/AGENTS.md, templates/chat/CLAUDE.md, templates/clips/AGENTS.md, templates/clips/CLAUDE.md, templates/content/AGENTS.md, templates/content/CLAUDE.md, templates/design/AGENTS.md, templates/design/CLAUDE.md, templates/dispatch/AGENTS.md, templates/dispatch/CLAUDE.md, templates/forms/AGENTS.md, templates/forms/CLAUDE.md, templates/macros/AGENTS.md, templates/macros/CLAUDE.md, templates/mail/AGENTS.md, templates/mail/CLAUDE.md, templates/plan/AGENTS.md, templates/plan/CLAUDE.md, templates/slides/AGENTS.md, templates/slides/CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | met | 15 / 15 | llms.txt present |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 70 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 67/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | partial | 12.6 / 18 | templates/clips/desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.mjs |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | packages/agent-chrome-extension/tsconfig.json, packages/code-agents-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/core/src/templates/default/tsconfig.json, packages/core/src/templates/headless/tsconfig.json, packages/core/src/templates/workspace-core/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/desktop-app/tsconfig.json, packages/dispatch/tsconfig.json, packages/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/embedding/tsconfig.json, packages/frame/tsconfig.json, packages/marketing/tsconfig.json, packages/migrate/tsconfig.json, packages/mobile-app/tsconfig.json, packages/pinpoint/tsconfig.json, packages/scheduling/tsconfig.json, packages/shared-app-config/tsconfig.json, packages/skills/tsconfig.json, packages/toolkit/tsconfig.json, packages/vscode-extension/tsconfig.json, templates/analytics/tsconfig.json, templates/assets/tsconfig.json, templates/brain/tsconfig.json, templates/calendar/tsconfig.json, templates/chat/tsconfig.json, templates/clips/chrome-extension/tsconfig.json, templates/clips/desktop/tsconfig.json, templates/clips/tsconfig.json, templates/content/tsconfig.json, templates/design/app/components/design/bridge/tsconfig.json, templates/design/tsconfig.json, templates/dispatch/tsconfig.json, templates/forms/tsconfig.json, templates/macros/tsconfig.json, templates/mail/tsconfig.json, templates/plan/tsconfig.json, templates/slides/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | not met | 0 / 10 | no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| Automated maintenance | not met | 0 / 8 | no automated dependency updates observed |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 53.7 / 55 | 170/7426 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | not met | 0 / 40 | — |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | recipes |

## Collection warnings

- npm package '@agent-native/core' points at a different repository (https://github.com/BuilderIO/agent-native); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- npm package '@agent-native/skills' points at a different repository (https://github.com/BuilderIO/agent-native); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Could not fetch npm package '@agent-native/migrate' from its registry
- npm package '@agent-native/toolkit' points at a different repository (https://github.com/BuilderIO/agent-native); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- npm package '@agent-native/dispatch' points at a different repository (https://github.com/BuilderIO/agent-native); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- npm package '@agent-native/pinpoint' points at a different repository (https://github.com/BuilderIO/agent-native); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Could not fetch npm package '@agent-native/embedding' from its registry
- npm package '@agent-native/scheduling' points at a different repository (https://github.com/BuilderIO/agent-native); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Resolved dependency list truncated to 2000 of 4033 packages (counts remain complete)
- deps.dev does not index npm:@agent-native/core@0.114.16; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt