# synapsecns/sanguine — health index 72/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository synapsecns/sanguine by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 72 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/synapsecns/sanguine
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/synapsecns/sanguine
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/synapsecns/sanguine/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/s/synapsecns/sanguine.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-27
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.27.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 84/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 60/100 | Moderate |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 70/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 82/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 62/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 87/100 | Excellent |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Synapse Monorepo |
| Primary language | Go |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 56 |
| Forks | 44 |
| Created | 2022-05-24 |
| Last push | 2026-07-24 |
| Latest release | contrib/terraform-provider-grafanaamg/v0.0.3 |
| Commits (last year) | 145 |
| Bus factor | 3 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | sanguine | 0.0.7 | 39 |
| go | github.com/synapsecns/sanguine/core | v1.11.1 | — |
| go | github.com/synapsecns/sanguine/tools | v1.20.1 | — |
| go | github.com/synapsecns/sanguine/agents | v1.24.1 | — |
| go | github.com/synapsecns/sanguine/ethergo | v1.20.1 | — |

## Vitality — 84/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 82/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 2 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 18 / 36 | 26/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 145 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 87/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | met | 36 / 36 | latest release 5 days ago |
| Release cadence | partial | 19.8 / 27 | a release every ~56.5 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | partial | 4 / 10 | 3 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts. |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | last human commit 5 days ago |

## Community & Adoption — 60/100 (Moderate)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 46/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 28.2 / 60 | 56 stars |
| Forks | partial | 13.6 / 25 | 44 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 3.9 / 15 | 6 watchers |

### Community health — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | met | 18 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 70/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 36 / 54 | 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 17.8 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 21% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 21 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 33 / 46.8 | 71% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 25.2 / 38.2 | 2569/3898 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 1.5 / 15 | Found 4/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 66/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 14.9 / 25 | 119 followers of synapsecns |
| Track record | partial | 20.8 / 25 | 26 public repos, account ~5 yr old |

### Package maintenance — 79/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published & resolvable | met | 25 / 25 | 4 package(s) on go |
| Publish recency | partial | 14 / 35 | latest publish 513 days ago |
| Version history | met | 20 / 20 | 415 published versions |
| Not deprecated | met | 20 / 20 | active, not deprecated or yanked |

## Engineering Quality — 82/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 86/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 22 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, .golangci.yml |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | partial | 16 / 20 | 18 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |

### Documentation — 75/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Repository description | met | 10 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 62/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 52/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | partial | 5.2 / 7.5 | binaries present in source code |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 2.2 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | partial | 2 / 2.5 | 18 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 0.8 / 7.5 | Found 4/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | met | 5 / 5 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | partial | 4.5 / 5 | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | partial | 2 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | partial | 3 / 7.5 | 3 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts. |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 458 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### Dependency advisories — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:sanguine@0.0.7 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 9 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct dependencies free of known advisories | met | 35 / 35 | no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| Indirect dependencies free of known advisories | met | 25 / 25 | no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| No advisories left outstanding | excluded | 0 / 40 | no advisory carries a publication date |

### Malicious dependencies — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| No dependency reported as a malicious package | met | 100 / 100 | no dependency is reported as a malicious package |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 87/100 (Excellent)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | contrib/opbot/CLAUDE.md, contrib/promexporter/CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | met | 40 / 40 | 85 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 87/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | Makefile, agents/Makefile, charts/Makefile, contrib/git-changes-action/Makefile, contrib/golang-ci-lint/Makefile, contrib/opbot/Makefile, contrib/promexporter/Makefile, contrib/release-copier-action/Makefile, contrib/screener-api/Makefile, contrib/terraform-provider-grafanaamg/Makefile, core/Makefile, ethergo/Makefile, packages/contracts-core/Makefile, services/cctp-relayer/Makefile, services/explorer/Makefile, services/omnirpc/Makefile, services/rfq/Makefile, services/scribe/Makefile, tools/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json, .golangci.yml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | docs/bridge/tsconfig.json, packages/contracts-adapter/tsconfig.json, packages/contracts-core/tsconfig.json, packages/explorer-ui/jsconfig.json, packages/explorer-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/rest-api/tsconfig.json, packages/rfq-indexer/api/src/tsconfig.json, packages/rfq-indexer/indexer/tsconfig.json, packages/rfq-loadtest/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-router/tsconfig.json, packages/synapse-constants/tsconfig.json, packages/synapse-interface/tsconfig.json, packages/widget-example/tsconfig.json, packages/widget/examples/landing-page/tsconfig.json, packages/widget/examples/with-next/tsconfig.json, packages/widget/examples/with-react/tsconfig.json, packages/widget/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | met | 10 / 10 | 22 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 99/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Go (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 53.8 / 55 | 63/2784 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | contrib/screener-api/docs/swagger.json, contrib/screener-api/docs/swagger.yaml, packages/rest-api/swagger.json, packages/rfq-indexer/api/src/graphql/queries/queries.graphql, packages/rfq-indexer/api/src/graphql/types/events.graphql, packages/synapse-interface/graphql/GetUserHistoricalTransactions.graphql, services/explorer/consumer/client/queries/queries.graphql, services/explorer/graphql/client/queries/queries.graphql, services/explorer/graphql/server/graph/schema/directives.graphql, services/explorer/graphql/server/graph/schema/message.graphql, services/explorer/graphql/server/graph/schema/queries.graphql, services/explorer/graphql/server/graph/schema/types.graphql, services/omnirpc/swagger/openapi.yaml, services/rfq/api/docs/swagger.json, services/rfq/api/docs/swagger.yaml, services/scribe/graphql/client/queries/queries.graphql, services/scribe/graphql/server/graph/schema/directives.graphql, services/scribe/graphql/server/graph/schema/queries.graphql, services/scribe/graphql/server/graph/schema/types.graphql, services/scribe/grpc/client/rest/api/swagger.yaml, services/scribe/grpc/proto/types/v1/filter.proto, services/scribe/grpc/proto/types/v1/log.proto, services/scribe/grpc/proto/types/v1/service.proto, services/scribe/grpc/proto/types/v1/types.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | example, examples |

## Collection warnings

- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- npm package 'sanguine' points at a different repository (https://github.com/superunrelated/sanguine); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Resolved dependency list truncated to 3000 of 6719 packages (counts remain complete)

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt