# threefoldtech/tfgrid-sdk-go — health index 62/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository threefoldtech/tfgrid-sdk-go by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/threefoldtech/tfgrid-sdk-go
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/threefoldtech/tfgrid-sdk-go
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/threefoldtech/tfgrid-sdk-go/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/t/threefoldtech/tfgrid-sdk-go.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-15
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 82/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 32/100 | At risk |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 65/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 74/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 50/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 66/100 | Moderate |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary language | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 2 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Created | 2023-04-11 |
| Last push | 2026-07-13 |
| Latest release | v0.17.6 |
| Commits (last year) | 88 |
| Bus factor | 2 |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/activation-service | v0.11.2 | — |
| go | github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/grid-cli | v0.18.0 | — |
| go | github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/grid-client | v0.18.0 | — |
| go | github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/grid-proxy | v0.18.0 | — |
| go | github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/rmb-sdk-go | v0.18.0 | — |

## Vitality — 82/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 77/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 1 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 15.9 / 36 | 23/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | partial | 17.5 / 18 | 88 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Release discipline — 90/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | met | 27 / 27 | 100 releases published |
| Release recency | partial | 27 / 36 | latest release 110 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~24.1 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 32/100 (At risk)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 10/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | not met | 0 / 60 | 2 stars |
| Forks | partial | 4 / 25 | 4 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 6.4 / 15 | 15 watchers |

### Community health — 57/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | met | 6.3 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 65/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 60/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 25.2 / 54 | 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 15.5 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 31% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 22 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Ownership & stewardship — 70/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 14.7 / 25 | 110 followers of threefoldtech |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 129 public repos, account ~7 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 74/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 10 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .golangci.yml |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Documentation — 65/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Repository description | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 50/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security policy (SECURITY.md) | not met | 0 / 30 | — |
| Dependabot config | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Dependency lockfiles | met | 25 / 25 | go.sum |
| CodeQL workflow | not met | 0 / 20 | — |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 66/100 (Moderate)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 1/100 (Critical)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | not met | 0 / 45 | no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 96/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | Makefile, activation-service/Makefile, farmerbot/Makefile, grid-cli/Makefile, grid-client/Makefile, grid-proxy/Makefile, gridify/Makefile, manual/Makefile, monitoring-bot/Makefile, rmb-sdk-go/Makefile, tfrobot/Makefile, tools/relay-cache-warmer/Makefile, user-contracts-mon/Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .golangci.yml |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | Go (statically typed) |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | excluded | 0 / 10 | OpenSSF Scorecard unavailable |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | Go (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.8 / 55 | 1/366 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 80/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | grid-proxy/docs/swagger.json, grid-proxy/docs/swagger.yaml, rmb-sdk-go/peer/types.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | example, examples |

## Collection warnings

- Some issue/PR counts unavailable (search API limit); rerun later
- go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/activation-service' points at a different repository (https://github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Could not fetch go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/farmerbot' from its registry
- go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/grid-cli' points at a different repository (https://github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/grid-client' points at a different repository (https://github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/grid-proxy' points at a different repository (https://github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Could not fetch go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/gridify' from its registry
- Could not fetch go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/monitoring-bot' from its registry
- go package 'github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go/rmb-sdk-go' points at a different repository (https://github.com/threefoldtech/zos_sdk_go); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt