# ttoss/ttoss — health index 73/100 (Good)

> Inspection of the public repository ttoss/ttoss by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/ttoss/ttoss
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/ttoss/ttoss
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/ttoss/ttoss/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/t/ttoss/ttoss.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-17
- Methodology: metrics 2.3.1, report schema 0.11.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 21% | 77/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 17% | 39/100 | Weak |
| Sustainability & Governance | 23% | 63/100 | Moderate |
| Engineering Quality | 19% | 82/100 | Excellent |
| Security | 16% | 51/100 | Moderate |
| AI Readiness | 4% | 86/100 | Excellent |

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Homepage | https://ttoss.dev |
| Primary language | TypeScript |
| License | MIT |
| Stars | 16 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Created | 2022-06-13 |
| Last push | 2026-07-17 |
| Latest release | v1.19.1 |
| Commits (last year) | 673 |
| Bus factor | 2 |

## Vitality — 77/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 21% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 96/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 32.5 / 36 | 47/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 673 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | met | 10 / 10 | 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |

### Release discipline — 48/100 (Weak)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | partial | 16.2 / 27 | 10 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| Release recency | not met | 0 / 36 | latest release 1456 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~2.7 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 39/100 (Weak)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 17% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 29/100 (At Risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 19.1 / 60 | 16 stars |
| Forks | partial | 7 / 25 | 8 forks |
| Watchers | partial | 2.7 / 15 | 4 watchers |

### Community health — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (MIT) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 63/100 (Moderate)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 23% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 62/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 25.2 / 54 | 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 13.2 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 42% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 20 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 6 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 71/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | partial | 32.2 / 42 | 77% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | partial | 26.5 / 30 | 777/880 decided PRs merged |
| Newcomer PR acceptance | excluded | 0 / 13 | no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | partial | 3 / 15 | Found 6/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 57/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | met | 30 / 30 | organization-owned |
| Verified domain | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Owner reach | partial | 6.1 / 25 | 6 followers of ttoss |
| Track record | partial | 21 / 25 | 16 public repos, account ~6 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 82/100 (Excellent)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 19% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 84/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 6 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs |
| Pre-commit hooks | not met | 0 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | not met | 0 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | met | 20 / 20 | 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |

### Documentation — 80/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | met | 30 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://ttoss.dev |
| Repository description | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 51/100 (Moderate)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 51/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | partial | 6 / 7.5 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | partial | 1.5 / 7.5 | Found 6/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 6 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | met | 10 / 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | not met | 0 / 5 | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| Security-Policy | not met | 0 / 5 | security policy file not detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 36 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 86/100 (Excellent)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight: agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but its absence must never gate the top of the scale (calibration saturates at raw 91, so 100/100 remains reachable with AI Readiness at zero).

### Agent context & guidance — 100/100 (Exceptional)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/agentic-development-principles.instructions.md, .github/instructions/ai.instructions.md, .github/instructions/carlin.instructions.md, .github/instructions/chakra-ui.instructions.md, .github/instructions/docs.instructions.md, .github/instructions/forms.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fsl-tests.instructions.md, .github/instructions/fsl-theme.instructions.md, .github/instructions/general.instructions.md, .github/instructions/packages.instructions.md, .github/instructions/react-packages-architecture.instructions.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/geovis/CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | met | 15 / 15 | llms.txt present |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 66/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | .eslintrc.cjs, .eslintrc.js, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | challenge/packages/api-graphql-with-dynamodb/tsconfig.json, challenge/packages/app-vite-with-graphql-api/tsconfig.json, challenge/packages/db-dynamodb/tsconfig.json, challenge/packages/db-postgresdb/tsconfig.json, docs/storybook/tsconfig.json, docs/website/tsconfig.json, examples/http-server-mcp-calculator/tsconfig.json, packages/appsync-api/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-core/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/auth-core/tsconfig.json, packages/aws-appsync-nodejs/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/aws-appsync-nodejs/tsconfig.json, packages/carlin/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/carlin/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-auth/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-roles/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-vpc/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-vpc/tsconfig.json, packages/cloudformation/tsconfig.json, packages/components/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/components/tsconfig.json, packages/config/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/config/tsconfig.json, packages/forms/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/forms/tsconfig.json, packages/fsl-bench/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/fsl-bench/tsconfig.json, packages/fsl-theme/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/fsl-theme/tsconfig.json, packages/fsl-ui/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/fsl-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/geovis-workspace/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/geovis-workspace/tsconfig.json, packages/geovis/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/geovis/tsconfig.json, packages/google-maps/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/google-maps/tsconfig.json, packages/graphql-api-cli/tsconfig.json, packages/graphql-api-server/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/graphql-api-server/tsconfig.json, packages/graphql-api/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/graphql-api/tsconfig.json, packages/http-server-auth/tsconfig.json, packages/http-server-mcp/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/http-server-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/http-server-serverless/tsconfig.json, packages/http-server/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/http-server/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n-cli/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n-cli/tsconfig.json, packages/ids/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/ids/tsconfig.json, packages/lambda-postgres-query/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/lambda-postgres-query/tsconfig.json, packages/landing-pages/tsconfig.json, packages/layouts/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/layouts/tsconfig.json, packages/logger/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/logger/tsconfig.json, packages/monorepo/tsconfig.json, packages/oauth-client/tsconfig.json, packages/postgresdb-cli/tsconfig.json, packages/postgresdb/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/postgresdb/tsconfig.json, packages/react-auth-cognito/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-auth-cognito/tsconfig.json, packages/react-auth-core/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-auth-core/tsconfig.json, packages/react-auth-strapi/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-auth-strapi/tsconfig.json, packages/react-billing/tsconfig.json, packages/react-dashboard/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-dashboard/tsconfig.json, packages/react-feature-flags/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-feature-flags/tsconfig.json, packages/react-hooks/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-hooks/tsconfig.json, packages/react-i18n/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-i18n/tsconfig.json, packages/react-icons/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-icons/tsconfig.json, packages/react-notifications/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-notifications/tsconfig.json, packages/react-wizard/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/react-wizard/tsconfig.json, packages/read-config-file/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/read-config-file/tsconfig.json, packages/relay-amplify/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/relay-amplify/tsconfig.json, packages/test-utils/tsconfig.json, packages/theme/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/theme/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tests/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, terezinha-farm/api/tsconfig.json, terezinha-farm/auth/tsconfig.json, terezinha-farm/config/tsconfig.json, terezinha-farm/iam/tsconfig.json, terezinha-farm/postgresdb/tests/tsconfig.json, terezinha-farm/postgresdb/tsconfig.json, terezinha-farm/vite-app/tsconfig.json |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | excluded | 0 / 8 | no data |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | met | 45 / 45 | TypeScript (statically typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 55 / 55 | 1/1447 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 100/100 (Exceptional)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | challenge/packages/app-vite-with-graphql-api/schema/schema.graphql |
| MCP server | met | 20 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | met | 40 / 40 | examples, recipes |

## Collection warnings

- Resolved dependency list truncated to 2000 of 3519 packages (counts remain complete)

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt