# whitphx/streamlit — health index 61/100 (Moderate)

> Inspection of the public repository whitphx/streamlit by inspect.software. It holds a health index of 61 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. The index is a signal derived from publicly visible practice, not a warranty, a security audit, or an endorsement, and it is independent of payment.

- Repository: https://github.com/whitphx/streamlit
- Report page: https://inspect.software/software/whitphx/streamlit
- Full JSON report: https://inspect.software/api/repositories/whitphx/streamlit/report
- Badge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/inspect-software/badges/main/v1/w/whitphx/streamlit.svg
- Inspected: 2026-07-20
- Methodology: metrics 1.13.0, report schema 0.15.0 (https://inspect.software/methodology.md)

## Category summary

| Category | Weight | Index | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitality | 22% | 77/100 | Good |
| Community & Adoption | 18% | 19/100 | Critical |
| Sustainability & Governance | 24% | 82/100 | Good |
| Engineering Quality | 20% | 80/100 | Good |
| Security | 16% | 33/100 | At risk |
| AI Readiness | not counted | 75/100 | Good |

## Repository facts

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Description | Streamlit — The fastest way to build data apps in Python |
| Homepage | https://streamlit.io |
| Primary language | Python |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 8 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Created | 2021-11-07 |
| Last push | 2026-07-19 |
| Latest release | 1.54.0 |
| Commits (last year) | 1,205 |
| Bus factor | 5 |
| Fork | yes |

## Published packages

| Registry | Package | Latest | Monthly downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | streamlit-component-lib | 2.0.0 | 31,009 |
| pypi | streamlit | 1.59.2 | 26,554,329 |

## Vitality — 77/100 (Good)

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping? Weight: 22% of the overall index.

### Development activity — 76/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push recency | met | 36 / 36 | last push 0 days ago |
| Commit cadence | partial | 22.2 / 36 | 32/52 weeks with commits |
| Commit volume | met | 18 / 18 | 1205 commits in the last year |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained | not met | 0 / 10 | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |

### Release discipline — 78/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ships releases | partial | 16.2 / 27 | 6 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| Release recency | partial | 27 / 36 | latest release 166 days ago |
| Release cadence | met | 27 / 27 | a release every ~12.4 days |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 10 | no releases found |

### Abandonment — 100/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project is still maintained | met | 100 / 100 | maintenance record not established from the collected data |

## Community & Adoption — 19/100 (Critical)

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors? Weight: 18% of the overall index.

### Popularity & adoption — 14/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stars | partial | 13.7 / 60 | 8 stars |
| Forks | not met | 0 / 25 | 1 forks |
| Watchers | not met | 0 / 15 | 1 watchers |

### Community health — 25/100 (Critical)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | not met | 0 / 22.5 | — |
| License | met | 22.5 / 22.5 | recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| CONTRIBUTING guide | not met | 0 / 18 | — |
| Code of conduct | not met | 0 / 13.5 | — |
| Issue template | not met | 0 / 7.2 | — |
| PR template | not met | 0 / 6.3 | — |

## Sustainability & Governance — 82/100 (Good)

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep? Weight: 24% of the overall index.

### Maintainer resilience (bus factor) — 89/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bus factor | partial | 45.9 / 54 | 5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| Commit distribution | partial | 19.3 / 22.5 | top contributor authored 14% of commits |
| Contributor breadth | met | 13.5 / 13.5 | 100 contributors |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors | met | 10 / 10 | project has 36 contributing companies or organizations |

### Issue & PR responsiveness — 85/100 (Excellent)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue resolution | met | 46.8 / 46.8 | 100% of issues closed |
| PR acceptance | met | 38.2 / 38.2 | 21/21 decided PRs merged |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review | not met | 0 / 15 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |

### Ownership & stewardship — 69/100 (Moderate)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership backing | partial | 10 / 30 | personal (user) account |
| Verified domain | excluded | 0 / 20 | not applicable to user accounts |
| Owner reach | partial | 20.5 / 25 | 712 followers of whitphx |
| Track record | met | 25 / 25 | 166 public repos, account ~13 yr old |

## Engineering Quality — 80/100 (Good)

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place? Weight: 20% of the overall index.

### Engineering practices — 100/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| CI workflows | met | 24 / 24 | 40 workflow(s) |
| Tests present | met | 24 / 24 | — |
| Linter config | met | 16 / 16 | eslint.config.mjs |
| Pre-commit hooks | met | 9.6 / 9.6 | — |
| .editorconfig | met | 6.4 / 6.4 | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 20 | no pull request found |

### Documentation — 50/100 (Moderate)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| README | not met | 0 / 30 | — |
| Documentation directory | met | 25 / 25 | — |
| Documentation / homepage site | met | 15 / 15 | https://streamlit.io |
| Repository description | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Topics | not met | 0 / 10 | — |
| Wiki | met | 10 / 10 | — |

## Security — 33/100 (At risk)

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, with no malicious dependency and no unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure? Weight: 16% of the overall index.

### Security posture — 33/100 (At risk)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | not met | 0 / 7.5 | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| CI-Tests | excluded | 0 / 2.5 | no pull request found |
| CII-Best-Practices | not met | 0 / 2.5 | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| Code-Review | not met | 0 / 7.5 | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | project has 36 contributing companies or organizations |
| Dangerous-Workflow | not met | 0 / 10 | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | met | 7.5 / 7.5 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | not met | 0 / 5 | project is not fuzzed |
| License | met | 2.5 / 2.5 | license file detected |
| Maintained | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| Packaging | excluded | 0 / 5 | packaging workflow not detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 5 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| SAST | met | 5 / 5 | SAST tool detected: CodeQL |
| Security-Policy | met | 5 / 5 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | excluded | 0 / 7.5 | no releases found |
| Token-Permissions | not met | 0 / 7.5 | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| Vulnerabilities | not met | 0 / 7.5 | 108 existing vulnerabilities detected |

### High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure — 100/100 (Excellent)

Only high-confidence self-published location evidence affects this multiplier. Ambiguous matches are review-only; country evidence is not proof of nationality, citizenship, legal registration, malicious intent, or sanctions status.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy exposure multiplier | met | 100 / 100 | no confirmed policy-scope location match |

## AI Readiness — 75/100 (Good)

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? An independent, experimental badge — weight 0.0, so it is surfaced on its own and does not affect the overall health score.

### Agent context & guidance — 75/100 (Good)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agent instructions | met | 45 / 45 | .claude/skills/AGENTS.md, .claude/skills/CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules/e2e_playwright.mdc, .cursor/rules/overview.mdc, .cursor/rules/protobuf.mdc, .cursor/rules/python.mdc, .cursor/rules/python_lib.mdc, .cursor/rules/python_tests.mdc, .cursor/rules/skills.mdc, .cursor/rules/typescript.mdc, .cursor/rules/workflows.mdc, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/e2e_playwright.instructions.md, .github/instructions/protobuf.instructions.md, .github/instructions/python.instructions.md, .github/instructions/python_lib.instructions.md, .github/instructions/python_tests.instructions.md, .github/instructions/skills.instructions.md, .github/instructions/typescript.instructions.md, .github/instructions/workflows.instructions.md, .github/workflows/AGENTS.md, .github/workflows/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, e2e_playwright/AGENTS.md, e2e_playwright/CLAUDE.md, frontend/AGENTS.md, frontend/CLAUDE.md, lib/AGENTS.md, lib/CLAUDE.md, lib/streamlit/AGENTS.md, lib/streamlit/CLAUDE.md, lib/tests/AGENTS.md, lib/tests/CLAUDE.md, proto/streamlit/proto/AGENTS.md, proto/streamlit/proto/CLAUDE.md |
| Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) | not met | 0 / 15 | — |
| Legible commit history | excluded | 0 / 40 | no data |

### Verify loop (build / test / typecheck) — 86/100 (Excellent)

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-command bootstrap | met | 18 / 18 | Makefile |
| Automated tests | met | 22 / 22 | — |
| Lint / format config | met | 11 / 11 | eslint.config.mjs |
| Static type checking | met | 11 / 11 | component-lib/tsconfig.json, frontend/app/tsconfig.json, frontend/component-v2-lib/tsconfig.json, frontend/connection/tsconfig.json, frontend/eslint-plugin-streamlit-custom/tsconfig.json, frontend/lib/tsconfig.json, frontend/tsconfig.json, frontend/utils/tsconfig.json, lib/streamlit/py.typed |
| Reproducible environment | met | 10 / 10 | devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile |
| Demonstrated agent practice | excluded | 0 / 10 | no data |
| Automated maintenance | partial | 5 / 8 | dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies | not met | 0 / 10 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |

### Code legibility for models — 81/100 (Good)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type-checkable code | partial | 27 / 45 | Python with type-check config (component-lib/tsconfig.json, frontend/app/tsconfig.json, frontend/component-v2-lib/tsconfig.json, frontend/connection/tsconfig.json, frontend/eslint-plugin-streamlit-custom/tsconfig.json, frontend/lib/tsconfig.json, frontend/tsconfig.json, frontend/utils/tsconfig.json, lib/streamlit/py.typed) |
| Manageable file sizes | partial | 54.4 / 55 | 23/2057 source files over 60KB |

### Machine-readable interfaces — 40/100 (At risk)

| Criterion | Status | Points | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) | met | 40 / 40 | proto/streamlit/proto/Alert.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/AppPage.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ArrowData.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ArrowNamedDataSet.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Audio.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/AudioInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/AuthRedirect.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/AutoRerun.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/BackMsg.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Balloons.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/BidiComponent.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Block.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Button.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ButtonGroup.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ButtonLikeIconPosition.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/CameraInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ChatInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Checkbox.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ClientState.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Code.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ColorPicker.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Common.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Components.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Dataframe.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/DateInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/DateTimeInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/DeckGlJsonChart.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Delta.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/DownloadButton.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Element.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Empty.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Exception.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Favicon.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Feedback.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/FileUploader.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ForwardMsg.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/GapSize.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/GitInfo.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/GraphVizChart.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Heading.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/HeightConfig.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Help.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Html.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/IFrame.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Image.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Json.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/LabelVisibility.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/LinkButton.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Logo.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Markdown.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Metric.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/MetricsEvent.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/MultiSelect.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Navigation.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/NewSession.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/NumberInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/PageConfig.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/PageInfo.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/PageLink.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/PageNotFound.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/PageProfile.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/ParentMessage.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/PlotlyChart.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Progress.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Radio.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/RootContainer.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Selectbox.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/SessionEvent.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/SessionStatus.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Skeleton.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Slider.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Snow.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Space.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Spinner.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Table.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Text.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/TextAlignmentConfig.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/TextArea.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/TextInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/TimeInput.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Toast.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Transient.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/VegaLiteChart.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/Video.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/WidgetStates.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/WidthConfig.proto, proto/streamlit/proto/openmetrics_data_model.proto |
| MCP server | not met | 0 / 20 | — |
| Runnable examples | not met | 0 / 40 | — |

## Collection warnings

- Community profile unavailable
- npm package 'streamlit-component-lib' points at a different repository (https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- pypi package 'streamlit' points at a different repository (https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- Could not fetch pypi package 'streamlit-dev' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

## What this report is

inspect.software measures public repositories against a single published, versioned methodology and reports the result as a 1–100 health index. Findings are signals derived from what is visible in public repository data — they are not a security audit, a warranty, or an endorsement, and no result depends on payment.

- Methodology, formulas and weights: https://inspect.software/methodology.md
- What a result does and does not claim: https://inspect.software/wiki/signals-not-warranties.md
- Rating bands: https://inspect.software/wiki/scoring-bands.md
- Corrections: https://inspect.software/contact.md
- Index of all documents: https://inspect.software/llms.txt