Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 01:52 UTC

y-crdt / y-crdt

Rust port of Yjs

Rust · C++Custom license★ 2,157 stars⑂ 141 forkssince Sep 2020View on GitHub ↗

y-crdt/y-crdt holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

y-crdtOrganization
120 followers18 public repossince Nov 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioyrs0.27.4406,3468119 days agocrdtyrs
crates.ioyffi0.27.41158019 days agoc-fficrdtyrs
crates.ioywasmpoints to another repo — not scored0.19.27359785 days agocrdtwasmyrs

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume136 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained29 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year136
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year24
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases9 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 19 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~216.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tagv0.27.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release19
mean_days_between_releases216.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
54.1/60Stars2,157 stars
17.9/25Forks141 forks
7.8/15Watchers26 watchers
Inputs used
forks141
stars2,157
watchers26
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
74.8/80Monthly downloads406,346 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesyrs
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads2,952,017
monthly_downloads406,346
unverified_packages_excludedyffi
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth40 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled40
top_contributor_share0.845
How it's scored
24.2/42Issue resolution58% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance356/399 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance2/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs356
open_issues104
closed_issues142
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.577
closed_unmerged_prs43
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15/25Owner reach120 followers of y-crdt
20.9/25Track record18 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers120
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginy-crdt
public_repos18
account_age_days2,123

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 19 days ago
20/20Version history81 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesyrs, yffi
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish19

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/yrs/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsyjs, crdt, rust
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.rs/yrs/
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/yrs/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained29 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: smallstr 0.3.1 (unknown)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages96
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the crates:yrs@0.27.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 96 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.8/40Legible commit history39 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.39
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, yffi/Cargo.toml, yrs/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, yffi/Cargo.toml, yrs/Cargo.toml, ywasm/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
47.8/55Manageable file sizes12/92 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes308,388
source_files_sampled92
oversized_source_files12

Key facts

2,157GitHub stars
40contributors
136commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
104open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'ywasm' points at a different repository (https://github.com/yjs/y-crdt/); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch npm package 'tests-wasm' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 141 ⇿
0Stars
141Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515013652020-122023-112026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 5

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 01:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 5/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained29 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmlib0^0.2.42tests-wasm/package.json
npmywasmfile:../ywasm/pkgtests-wasm/package.json
npmzlib^1.0.5tests-wasm/package.json
crates.ioyrs0.27.4yffi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0yffi/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.iofastrand2yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallstr0.3yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1.13yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-lock3.4yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarc-swap1.7yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6.0yrs/Cargo.toml
crates.ioyrs0.27.4ywasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2ywasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0ywasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen0.6ywasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64_light0.1ywasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole_error_panic_hook0.1.7ywasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowee_alloc0.4.5ywasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iojs-sys0.3ywasm/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 1

Installing crates:yrs@0.27.4 pulls in 96 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
smallstr0.3.1directunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.