Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-23 20:00 UTC

0x26res / ptars

Protobuf to Arrow, using Rust

Rust · PythonApache-2.0★ 30 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#python#rust

0x26res/ptars holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (53/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

0x26resPersonal account
21 followers32 public repossince May 2009Tradewell Technologies

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIptars0.0.2413,027290 days agoapache-arrowdataprotobufrust
crates.ioptars0.0.24274250 days agoserializationdataprotobufarrowdata-structuresencoding
crates.ioptars-core0.0.2442050 days agoserializationdataprotobufarrowdata-structuresencoding

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 173 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year173
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 22 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~24.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv0.0.24
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases24.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

32At Risk
How it's scored
23.7/60Stars — 30 stars
8/25Forks — 10 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars30
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

69Good
How it's scored
55.2/80Monthly downloads — 13,721 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesptars, ptars, ptars-core
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads2,685
monthly_downloads13,721
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.863

Issue & PR responsiveness

65Good
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
16.6/30PR acceptance — 137/247 decided PRs merged
9.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs137
open_issues2
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio0.867
closed_unmerged_prs110
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d5
first_time_prs_decided_30d7

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.7/25Owner reach — 21 followers of 0x26res
23.1/25Track record — 32 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_login0x26res
public_repos32
account_age_days6,351
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 29 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesptars, ptars, ptars-core
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ptars.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, rust
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://ptars.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

64Moderate
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: pyo3 0.28.3 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 104 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories10
affected_packages2
assessed_packages282
unassessed_packages12
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 282 resolved dependencies against OSV. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

82Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.3/40Legible commit history — 70 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.7
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes946

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — python/ptars/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/ptars/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, ptars-core/Cargo.toml, ptars-python/Cargo.toml, ptars/Cargo.toml, tests/arrow-version-independence/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

92Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
46.9/55Manageable file sizes — 4/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes239,330
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files4

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — protos/ptars_protos/bench.proto, protos/ptars_protos/benchmark.proto, protos/ptars_protos/imported.proto, protos/ptars_protos/importer.proto, protos/ptars_protos/simple.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesprotos/ptars_protos/bench.proto, protos/ptars_protos/benchmark.proto, protos/ptars_protos/imported.proto, protos/ptars_protos/importer.proto, protos/ptars_protos/simple.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

30GitHub stars
4contributors
173commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
2open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ptars-python' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:ptars@0.0.24; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012025-082026-032026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 15
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-23 20:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioarrow59ptars-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array59ptars-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema59ptars-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.45ptars-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost0.14.4ptars-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost-reflect0.16.5ptars-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow59ptars-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array59ptars-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema59ptars-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost0.14.4ptars-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost-reflect0.16.5ptars-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioptars-core—ptars-python/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.28.3ptars-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow59ptars/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-array59ptars/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow-schema59ptars/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost0.14.4ptars/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost-reflect0.16.5ptars/Cargo.toml
crates.ioptars-core—ptars/Cargo.toml
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos—pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf—pyproject.toml
PyPIpyarrow—pyproject.toml
All dependencies 294

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 271 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioarrow—direct
crates.ioarrow58.3.0direct
crates.ioarrow59.0.0direct
crates.ioarrow59.1.0direct
crates.ioarrow-array—direct
crates.ioarrow-array58.3.0direct
crates.ioarrow-array59.1.0direct
crates.ioarrow-array59.2.0direct
crates.ioarrow-schema—direct
crates.ioarrow-schema58.3.0direct
crates.ioarrow-schema59.1.0direct
crates.ioarrow-schema59.2.0direct
crates.iochrono—direct
crates.iochrono0.4.45direct
crates.ioprost—direct
crates.ioprost0.14.4direct
crates.ioprost-reflect—direct
crates.ioprost-reflect0.16.5direct
crates.iopyo3—direct
crates.iopyo30.28.3direct
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.1direct
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1direct
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1direct
crates.ioahash0.8.12indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.104indirect
crates.ioarrow-arith58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-arith59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-arith59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-buffer58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-buffer59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-buffer59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-cast58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-cast59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-cast59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-csv58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-csv59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-csv59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-data58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-data59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-data59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-ipc58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-ipc59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-ipc59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-json58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-json59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-json59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-ord58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-ord59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-ord59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-pyarrow59.0.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-row58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-row59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-row59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-select58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-select59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-select59.2.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-string58.3.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-string59.1.0indirect
crates.ioarrow-string59.2.0indirect
crates.ioatoi2.0.0indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobase640.23.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iocc1.2.66indirect
crates.iocc1.4.3indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioconst-random0.1.18indirect
crates.ioconst-random-macro0.1.16indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iocsv1.4.0indirect
crates.iocsv-core0.1.13indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.17.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.11indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.ioflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.34indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.65indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioitertools0.14.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.104indirect
crates.iolexical-core1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-parse-float1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-parse-integer1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-util1.0.7indirect
crates.iolexical-write-float1.0.6indirect
crates.iolexical-write-integer1.0.6indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionum-bigint0.4.8indirect
crates.ionum-bigint0.5.1indirect
crates.ionum-complex0.4.6indirect
crates.ionum-integer0.1.46indirect
crates.ionum-integer0.1.47indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.15.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.ioprost-derive0.14.4indirect
crates.ioprost-types—indirect
crates.ioprost-types0.14.4indirect
crates.iopyo3-build-config0.28.3indirect
crates.iopyo3-ffi0.28.3indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros0.28.3indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros-backend0.28.3indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.4indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.23indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosimdutf80.1.5indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.3indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iotiny-keccak2.0.2indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.127indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.54indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.56indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.54indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.56indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIastroid4.0.4indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIbracex3.0.1indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIbump-my-version1.5.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgit-changelog2.9.6indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.1.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.83.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio-tools1.83.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.10.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.10.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinstaller1.0.1indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImaturin1.14.1indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs—indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings—indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.6indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.5indirect
PyPInab-index0.0.13indirect
PyPInab-python0.0.13indirect
PyPInab-resolver0.0.13indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.5indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpipdeptree4.2.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprek0.4.13indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIprotarrow0.16.0indirect
PyPIptars—indirect
PyPIptars0.0.21indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpylint4.0.7indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.2.3indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytz2026.3.post1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrich-click1.9.8indirect
PyPIruff0.16.3indirect
PyPIsemver3.0.4indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPIty0.0.72indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf7.34.1.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcmatch11.0.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 282 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pyo30.28.3directhigh40.29.0
httpx22.10.0indirecthigh62.12.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with 0x26res/ptars. Read them side by side →

98apache/foryA blazingly fast multi-language serialization framework for idiomatic domain objects, schema IDL, and cross-language data exchange.Exceptional99apache/datafusionApache DataFusion SQL Query EngineExceptional98pola-rs/polarsExtremely fast Query Engine for DataFrames, written in RustExceptional98apache/datafusion-ballistaApache DataFusion Ballista Distributed Query EngineExceptional98delta-io/delta-rsA native Rust library for Delta Lake, with bindings into PythonExceptional98Eventual-Inc/DaftHigh-performance data engine for AI and multimodal workloads. Process images, audio, video, and structured data at any scaleExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, crates.io.