Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 02:01 UTC

0xfnzero / sol-trade-sdk

Rust SDK for low-latency Solana DEX trading bots with PumpFun, PumpSwap, Bonk, Raydium, Meteora, Jito, and SWQoS submit lanes.

RustMIT★ 323 stars⑂ 153 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#jito-bundle#pumpfun#pumpfun-sdk#pumpswap#raydium#raydium-swap#rust#solana#solana-bot#bonk#copy-trading#0xfnzero#fnzero#solana-trade#arbitrage#meteora#mev#sniper-bot#swqos#trading-bot

0xfnzero/sol-trade-sdk holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

WoodPersonal account
223 followers54 public repossince Aug 2012Fnzero

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iosol-trade-sdk5.0.02,6441210 days agomemecoinspumpfunpumpswapraydiumsolana

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

98Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 418 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year418
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 39 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count39
latest_release_tagv5.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

63Moderate
How it's scored
40.7/60Stars — 323 stars
18.2/25Forks — 153 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks153
stars323
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate
How it's scored
45.6/80Monthly downloads — 2,644 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessol-trade-sdk
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads32,715
monthly_downloads2,644
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 58% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.583

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good
How it's scored
39.2/42Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
23.9/30PR acceptance — 35/44 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs35
open_issues4
closed_issues56
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.933
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.9/25Owner reach — 223 followers of 0xfnzero
24.7/25Track record — 54 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers223
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_login0xfnzero
public_repos54
account_age_days5,096
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 121 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessol-trade-sdk
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://fnzero.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjito-bundle, pumpfun, pumpfun-sdk, pumpswap, raydium, raydium-swap, rust, solana, solana-bot, bonk, copy-trading, 0xfnzero, fnzero, solana-trade, arbitrage, meteora, mev, sniper-bot, swqos, trading-bot
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://fnzero.dev
docs_sitehttps://fnzero.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

39Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

13Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 2/140 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes89,173
source_files_sampled140
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

323GitHub stars
14contributors
418commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
39releases
1bus factor
4open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 02:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 72
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iosolana-sdk3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-client3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-program3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-rpc-client3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-rpc-client-api3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-transaction-status3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-account-decoder3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-hash3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-entry3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-rpc-client-nonce-utils3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-perf3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-metrics3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-tls-utils3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-nonce3.2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-address-lookup-table-interface3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-message3.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-compute-budget-interface3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-commitment-config3.1.1Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-transaction-status-client-types3.1.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-system-interface3.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioborsh1.5.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioisahc1.7.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.215Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.134Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3.31Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22.1Cargo.toml
crates.iobs580.5.1Cargo.toml
crates.iofive8_core0.1.2Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.9.0Cargo.toml
crates.iobincode1.3.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.90Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12.12Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.42.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotonic0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls0.23.23Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-native-certs0.8.1Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26.1Cargo.toml
crates.iocore_affinity0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.39Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.41Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.11Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.86Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.20.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost0.13Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost-types0.13Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_enum0.7.3Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-derive0.4.2Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4.3Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuck1.4.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrayref0.3.6Cargo.toml
crates.ioborsh-derive1.5.5Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.18.0Cargo.toml
crates.iofnv1.0.7Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioclru0.6Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1.15.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioarc-swap1.7Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10Cargo.toml
crates.iotonic-prost0.14.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioquinn0.11Cargo.toml
crates.iolunar-lander-quic-client0.4Cargo.toml
crates.iorcgen0.13Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.11Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossbeam-queue0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iomemmap20.9Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_cpus1.16Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2Cargo.toml
All dependencies 77

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 72 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow—direct
crates.ioarc-swap—direct
crates.ioarrayref—direct
crates.ioasync-trait—direct
crates.iobase64—direct
crates.iobincode—direct
crates.ioborsh—direct
crates.ioborsh-derive—direct
crates.iobs58—direct
crates.iobytemuck—direct
crates.iochrono—direct
crates.ioclru—direct
crates.iocore_affinity—direct
crates.iocrossbeam-queue—direct
crates.iocrossbeam-utils—direct
crates.iodashmap—direct
crates.iofive8_core—direct
crates.iofnv—direct
crates.iofutures—direct
crates.iofutures-util—direct
crates.iohex—direct
crates.ioindicatif—direct
crates.ioisahc—direct
crates.iolibc—direct
crates.iolunar-lander-quic-client—direct
crates.iomemmap2—direct
crates.ionum-derive—direct
crates.ionum-traits—direct
crates.ionum_cpus—direct
crates.ionum_enum—direct
crates.ioonce_cell—direct
crates.ioparking_lot—direct
crates.ioprost—direct
crates.ioprost-types—direct
crates.ioquinn—direct
crates.iorand—direct
crates.iorcgen—direct
crates.ioregex—direct
crates.ioreqwest—direct
crates.iorustls—direct
crates.iorustls-native-certs—direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.ioserde_json—direct
crates.iosha2—direct
crates.iosmallvec—direct
crates.iosolana-account-decoder—direct
crates.iosolana-address-lookup-table-interface—direct
crates.iosolana-client—direct
crates.iosolana-commitment-config—direct
crates.iosolana-compute-budget-interface—direct
crates.iosolana-entry—direct
crates.iosolana-hash—direct
crates.iosolana-message—direct
crates.iosolana-metrics—direct
crates.iosolana-nonce—direct
crates.iosolana-perf—direct
crates.iosolana-program—direct
crates.iosolana-rpc-client—direct
crates.iosolana-rpc-client-api—direct
crates.iosolana-rpc-client-nonce-utils—direct
crates.iosolana-sdk—direct
crates.iosolana-system-interface—direct
crates.iosolana-tls-utils—direct
crates.iosolana-transaction-status—direct
crates.iosolana-transaction-status-client-types—direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.iotokio-rustls—direct
crates.iotonic—direct
crates.iotonic-prost—direct
crates.iotracing—direct
crates.iouuid—direct
crates.ioclap—indirect
crates.iosol-parser-sdk—indirect
crates.iosolana-streamer-sdk—indirect
crates.iospl-associated-token-account—indirect
crates.iospl-token-2022—indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with 0xfnzero/sol-trade-sdk. Read them side by side →

97otter-sec/anchor⚓ Solana Program FrameworkExceptional100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional99modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdkThe official Rust SDK for the Model Context ProtocolExceptional99astral-sh/ruffAn extremely fast Python linter and code formatter, written in Rust.Exceptional99rust-lang/rustEmpowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.Exceptional99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.