Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 02:50 UTC

10up / wp_mock

WordPress API Mocking Framework

PHPCustom license★ 712 stars⑂ 72 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗

#wordpress #mockery #mocking-library #monkey-patching #patchwork #phpunit #testing-library #unit-testing

10up/wp_mock holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (84/100) and lowest on Vitality (49/100). It was last updated 72 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

10upOrganization · verified domain

715 followers181 public repossince Jan 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	10up/wp_mock	1.1.1	86,511	12	288 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

25At Risk

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 72 days ago
0.7/36	Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18	Commit volume — 4 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	4
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	72
active_weeks_last_year	1

Release discipline

84Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 75 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~363.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	11
latest_release_tag	1.1.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	75
mean_days_between_releases	363.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

70Good

How it's scored

46.3/60	Stars — 712 stars
15.4/25	Forks — 72 forks
8.8/15	Watchers — 39 watchers

Inputs used

forks	72
stars	712
watchers	39
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

86Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

83Excellent

How it's scored

65.8/80	Monthly downloads — 86,511 downloads/month across packagist
16.8/20	Registry dependents — 336 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	10up/wp_mock
dependents	336
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	3,393,836
monthly_downloads	86,511
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 32% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 40 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	40
top_contributor_share	0.318

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent

How it's scored

38.8/42	Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
24.8/30	PR acceptance — 118/143 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	118
open_issues	9
closed_issues	109
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.924
closed_unmerged_prs	25
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
20.5/25	Owner reach — 715 followers of 10up
25/25	Track record — 181 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	715
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	10up
public_repos	181
account_age_days	4,984

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 288 days ago
20/20	Version history — 12 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	10up/wp_mock
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	288

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

72Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
2/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://wp-mock.gitbook.io
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	wordpress, mockery, mocking-library, monkey-patching, patchwork, phpunit, testing-library, unit-testing
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://wp-mock.gitbook.io
docs_site	https://wp-mock.gitbook.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	5.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	19
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	81
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 3, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 81 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

41Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://wp-mock.gitbook.io/llms.txt)
25.6/40	Legible commit history — 47 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://wp-mock.gitbook.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.48
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/46 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	20,232
source_files_sampled	46
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

712GitHub stars

40contributors

4commits, last 12 months

72days since last push

11releases

2bus factor

9open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 72 ⇿

0Stars

72Forks

11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 6Patch 4

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10

5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 02:49 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1	CI-Tests	2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	mockery/mockery	`^1.6`	composer.json
Packagist	antecedent/patchwork	`^2.1`	composer.json

All dependencies 81

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	antecedent/patchwork	`2.1.27`	direct
Packagist	mockery/mockery	`1.6.7`	direct
Packagist	behat/behat	`3.13.0`	indirect
Packagist	behat/gherkin	`4.9.0`	indirect
Packagist	behat/transliterator	`1.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`0.7.2`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/instantiator	`1.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`3.42.0`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.2`	indirect
Packagist	hamcrest/hamcrest-php	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.11.1`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`4.18.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-coveralls/php-coveralls	`2.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-stubs/wordpress-globals	`0.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-stubs/wordpress-stubs	`6.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpcompatibility/php-compatibility	`9.3.5`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`1.10.50`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-mockery	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan-phpunit	`1.3.15`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`9.2.30`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`3.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`5.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`9.6.15`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`1.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`1.1.4`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`1.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`1.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`4.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`4.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`5.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`4.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`5.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`1.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`4.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/resource-operations	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sempro/phpunit-pretty-print	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`3.8.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/config	`5.4.31`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`5.4.32`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`5.4.33`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`2.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`5.4.26`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`2.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`5.4.25`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`5.4.27`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`5.4.21`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.28.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.28.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.28.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.28.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php73	`1.28.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php81	`1.28.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`5.4.46`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`2.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/stopwatch	`5.4.21`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`5.4.32`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation	`5.4.31`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation-contracts	`2.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`5.4.31`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.2.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 81 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.8.1`	indirect	high	9	`8.0.1`
phpunit/phpunit	`9.6.15`	indirect	high	1	`12.5.8`
squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`3.8.0`	indirect	high	1	`4.0.2`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.6.2`	indirect	moderate	4	`2.12.3`
symfony/process	`5.4.46`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.5`
symfony/yaml	`5.4.31`	indirect	moderate	3	`8.0.12`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records