Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-06 08:31 UTC

10up / wp_mock

WordPress API Mocking Framework

PHPCustom license★ 710 stars⑂ 72 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#wordpress#mockery#mocking-library#monkey-patching#patchwork#phpunit#testing-library#unit-testing

10up/wp_mock holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (46/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

10upOrganization
704 followers181 public repossince Jan 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagist10up/wp_mock1.1.183,87812246 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

25At Risk
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 31 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume — 4 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push31
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 33 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~363.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tag1.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release33
mean_days_between_releases363.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

70Good
How it's scored
46.2/60Stars — 710 stars
15.4/25Forks — 72 forks
8.8/15Watchers — 39 watchers
Inputs used
forks72
stars710
watchers39
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

82Excellent
How it's scored
65.6/80Monthly downloads — 83,878 downloads/month across packagist
16.9/20Registry dependents — 339 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packages10up/wp_mock
dependents339
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads3,269,401
monthly_downloads83,878
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 32% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 40 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled40
top_contributor_share0.318

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
24.8/30PR acceptance — 118/143 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs118
open_issues9
closed_issues109
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.924
closed_unmerged_prs25
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

94Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20.5/25Owner reach — 704 followers of 10up
25/25Track record — 181 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers704
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_login10up
public_repos181
account_age_days4,942
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 246 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages10up/wp_mock
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish246

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

72Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://wp-mock.gitbook.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswordpress, mockery, mocking-library, monkey-patching, patchwork, phpunit, testing-library, unit-testing
has_wikino
homepagehttps://wp-mock.gitbook.io
docs_sitehttps://wp-mock.gitbook.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories18
affected_packages5
assessed_packages81
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 81 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

26At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.6/40Legible commit history — 47 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.48
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/46 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes20,232
source_files_sampled46
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

710GitHub stars
40contributors
4commits, last 12 months
31days since last push
11releases
2bus factor
9open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 72 ⇿
0Stars
72Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756932013-042019-112026-07
Major 1Minor 6Patch 4

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-06 08:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistmockery/mockery^1.6composer.json
Packagistantecedent/patchwork^2.1composer.json
All dependencies 81

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistantecedent/patchwork2.1.27direct
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.7direct
Packagistbehat/behat3.13.0indirect
Packagistbehat/gherkin4.9.0indirect
Packagistbehat/transliterator1.5.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.1.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.3indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer0.7.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.5.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.42.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.8.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.0.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.6.2indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.0.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.11.1indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.18.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-coveralls/php-coveralls2.7.0indirect
Packagistphp-stubs/wordpress-globals0.2.0indirect
Packagistphp-stubs/wordpress-stubs6.4.1indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/php-compatibility9.3.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan1.10.50indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-mockery1.1.1indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit1.3.15indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.30indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.6.15indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.1.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.4indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistsempro/phpunit-pretty-print1.4.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.8.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/config5.4.31indirect
Packagistsymfony/console5.4.32indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection5.4.33indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts2.5.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher5.4.26indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts2.5.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem5.4.25indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder5.4.27indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver5.4.21indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process5.4.46indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts2.5.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch5.4.21indirect
Packagistsymfony/string5.4.32indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation5.4.31indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts2.5.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml5.4.31indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 81 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.8.1indirecthigh98.0.1
phpunit/phpunit9.6.15indirecthigh112.5.8
guzzlehttp/psr72.6.2indirectmoderate42.12.3
symfony/process5.4.46indirectmoderate18.0.5
symfony/yaml5.4.31indirectmoderate38.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with 10up/wp_mock. Read them side by side →

78Brain-WP/BrainMonkeyMocking utility for PHP functions and WordPress plugin APIGood67Yoast/wp-test-utilsPHPUnit and WordPress cross-version compatibility layer for testing plugins and themes build for WordPressGood88mockery/mockeryMockery is a simple yet flexible PHP mock object framework for use in unit testing with PHPUnit, PHPSpec or any other testing framework. Its core goal is to offer a test double framework with a succinct API capable of clearly defining all possible object operations and interactions using a human readable Domain Specific Language (DSL).Excellent86wp-cli/wp-cli-testsWP-CLI testing frameworkExcellent78nette/testerTester: enjoyable unit testing in PHP with code coverage reporter. 🍏🍏🍎🍏Good77Yoast/PHPUnit-PolyfillsSet of polyfills for changed PHPUnit functionality to allow for creating PHPUnit cross-version compatible testsGood

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.