Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 19:13 UTC

11ty / dev-server

A minimal generic web-development web server.

JavaScriptNo license detected★ 109 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Mar 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

11ty/dev-server holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Build Awesome (11ty)Organization · verified domain
736 followers74 public repossince Jan 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@11ty/eleventy-dev-serverpoints to another repo — not scored2.0.8625,01636548 days agoeleventyservercli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume — 65 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year65
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 23 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 29 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~42.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv3.0.0-alpha.11
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release29
mean_days_between_releases42.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

47Weak
How it's scored
33/60Stars — 109 stars
10.7/25Forks — 20 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks20
stars109
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.913

Issue & PR responsiveness

62Moderate
How it's scored
33.3/42Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
22.3/30PR acceptance — 26/35 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs26
open_issues23
closed_issues88
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.793
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d2

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
20.6/25Owner reach — 736 followers of 11ty
25/25Track record — 74 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers736
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_login11ty
public_repos74
account_age_days3,178

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

64Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

40Weak
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages48
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@11ty/eleventy-dev-server@2.0.8 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 48 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.5/40Legible commit history — 35 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.385
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

47Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/9 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes36,856
source_files_sampled9
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — sample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

109GitHub stars
14contributors
65commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
23open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package '@11ty/eleventy-dev-server' points at a different repository (https://github.com/11ty/eleventy-dev-server); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 20 ⇿
0Stars
20Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216202022022-042024-062026-09
Major 2Minor 0Patch 10

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 19:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@11ty/eleventy-utils^2.0.7package.json
npm@11ty/node-version-check^1.0.1package.json
npmchokidar^5.0.0package.json
npmfinalhandler^2.1.1package.json
npmmime^4.1.0package.json
npmminimist^1.2.8package.json
npmmorphdom^2.7.8package.json
npmobug^2.1.4package.json
npmrange-parser^1.3.0package.json
npmurlpattern-polyfill^10.1.0package.json
npmws^8.21.3package.json
All dependencies 156

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 145 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@11ty/eleventy-utils2.0.7direct
npm@11ty/node-version-check1.0.1direct
npmchokidar5.0.0direct
npmfinalhandler2.1.1direct
npmmime4.1.0direct
npmminimist1.2.8direct
npmmorphdom2.7.8direct
npmobug2.1.4direct
npmrange-parser1.3.0direct
npmurlpattern-polyfill10.1.0direct
npmws8.21.3direct
npm@cto.af/wtf80.0.5indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@mapbox/node-pre-gyp2.0.3indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.4.0indirect
npm@sindresorhus/merge-streams4.0.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vercel/nft1.10.2indirect
npmabbrev3.0.1indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-import-attributes1.9.5indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.5indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmarray-find-index1.0.2indirect
npmarrgv1.0.2indirect
npmarrify3.0.0indirect
npmasync-sema3.1.1indirect
npmava8.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbindings1.5.0indirect
npmblueimp-md52.19.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcallsites4.2.0indirect
npmcbor22.3.0indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmchunkd2.0.1indirect
npmci-info4.4.0indirect
npmci-parallel-vars1.0.1indirect
npmcli-truncate6.0.0indirect
npmcliui9.0.1indirect
npmcode-excerpt4.0.0indirect
npmcommon-path-prefix3.0.0indirect
npmconcordance5.0.4indirect
npmconsola3.4.2indirect
npmconvert-to-spaces2.0.1indirect
npmcurrently-unhandled0.4.1indirect
npmdate-time3.1.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmemittery2.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex10.6.0indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmescape-string-regexp2.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp5.0.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-diff1.3.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastq1.20.1indirect
npmfigures6.1.0indirect
npmfile-uri-to-path1.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up-simple1.0.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobby16.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmignore-by-default2.1.0indirect
npmindent-string5.0.0indirect
npmirregular-plurals4.2.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point5.1.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside4.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-object5.0.0indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported2.1.0indirect
npmjs-string-escape1.0.1indirect
npmjs-yaml3.14.2indirect
npmload-json-file7.0.1indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.1indirect
npmmatcher6.0.0indirect
npmmd5-hex3.0.1indirect
npmmemoize11.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmimic-function5.0.1indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4indirect
npmnopt8.1.0indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmp-map7.0.4indirect
npmpackage-config5.0.0indirect
npmparse-ms4.0.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmplur6.0.0indirect
npmpretty-ms9.3.0indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmreaddirp5.0.0indirect
npmresolve-cwd3.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.3indirect
npmserialize-error7.0.1indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmslash5.1.0indirect
npmslice-ansi9.0.0indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstack-utils2.0.6indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstring-width8.2.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmsupertap3.0.1indirect
npmtar7.5.16indirect
npmtemp-dir3.0.0indirect
npmtime-zone1.0.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmtype-fest0.13.1indirect
npmunicorn-magic0.4.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwell-known-symbols2.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi9.0.2indirect
npmwrite-file-atomic7.0.1indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
npmyargs18.0.0indirect
npmyargs-parser22.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@11ty/eleventy-dev-server@2.0.8 pulls in 48 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with 11ty/dev-server. Read them side by side →

100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100mui/material-uiMaterial UI: Comprehensive React component library that implements Google's Material Design. Free forever.Exceptional100ionic-team/ionic-frameworkA powerful cross-platform UI toolkit for building native-quality iOS, Android, and Progressive Web Apps with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.Exceptional100scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional100supabase/supabase-jsAn isomorphic Javascript client for Supabase. Query your Supabase database, subscribe to realtime events, upload and download files, browse typescript examples, invoke postgres functions via rpc, invoke supabase edge functions, query pgvector.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.