Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 15:34 UTC

ALCops / RoslynTestKit

Lightweight framework for unit-testing Roslyn diagnostic analyzers, code fixes and refactorings - adapted to the AL CodeAnalysis assemblies for Business Central.

C#Custom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Sep 2025forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#al-language#alcops#analyzer-testing#code-fixes#dynamics-365-business-central#roslyn#test-framework#unit-testing

ALCops/RoslynTestKit holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ALCopsOrganization
19 followers10 public repossince Jul 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetALCops.RoslynTestKit1.5.0-210 days agoroslyncodeanalysistesttestingtddanalyzerfixesrefactorrefactoringalbusinesscentral

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

57Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18Commit volume — 21 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year21
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 20 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~31.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv1.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases31.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

19Critical
How it's scored
0/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

62Moderate
How it's scored
49.9/80Total downloads — 63,580 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesALCops.RoslynTestKit
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads63,580
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 59% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.593

Issue & PR responsiveness

64Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
28.7/30PR acceptance — 22/23 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs22
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.4/25Owner reach — 19 followers of ALCops
9.9/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers19
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginALCops
public_repos10
account_age_days416

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 21 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesALCops.RoslynTestKit
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 18 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.nuget.org/packages/ALCops.RoslynTestKit
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsal-language, alcops, analyzer-testing, code-fixes, dynamics-365-business-central, roslyn, test-framework, unit-testing
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/ALCops.RoslynTestKit
docs_sitehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/ALCops.RoslynTestKit
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

37Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 18 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.7

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

57Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.3/40Legible commit history — 23 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.23
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,890

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

34At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifestssrc/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/40 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes16,787
source_files_sampled40
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
5contributors
21commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 15:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests18 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetDiffPlex1.5.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.6.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetApprovalTests5.4.4src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetSystem.Data.SqlClient4.9.1src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common5.0.3src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn16.0.1src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetSystem.DirectoryServices.Protocols5.0.1src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Xml6.0.1src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs6.0.3src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common3.1.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetApprovalTests7.0.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.8.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetApprovalTests7.0.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common4.14.0src/RoslynTestKit/RoslynTestKit.csproj
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ALCops/RoslynTestKit. Read them side by side →

91dotnet/roslynatorRoslynator is a set of code analysis tools for C#, powered by Roslyn.Excellent96microsoft/testfxThis repository holds the source code of Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP), a lightweight alternative to VSTest, as well as MSTest adapter and framework.Exceptional96mochajs/mocha☕️ Classic, reliable, trusted test framework for Node.js and the browserExceptional93sinonjs/sinonTest spies, stubs and mocks for JavaScript.Exceptional98microsoft/vstestVisual Studio Test Platform is the runner and engine that powers test explorer and vstest.console.Exceptional94nunit/nunitNUnit FrameworkExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.