Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 21:03 UTC

Admidio / admidio

Admidio is a free open source user management system for websites of organizations and groups. The system has a flexible role model so that it’s possible to reflect the structure and permissions of your organization.

PHPGPL-2.0★ 482 stars⑂ 172 forkssince Jan 2015View on GitHub ↗

#php #admidio #organization #user-management #membership #membership-management #club-management #members #photo-album #lists #event-management #documents-manager

Admidio/admidio holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (52/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AdmidioOrganization

20 followers5 public repossince Nov 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	admidio/admidio	v34	97	64	300 days ago	management organizations admidio

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
34.6/36	Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,285 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,285
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	50

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~21.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v5.0.17
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	8
mean_days_between_releases	21.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

69Good

How it's scored

43.5/60	Stars — 482 stars
18.6/25	Forks — 172 forks
7.1/15	Watchers — 20 watchers

Inputs used

forks	172
stars	482
watchers	20
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

26At Risk

How it's scored

26.5/80	Monthly downloads — 97 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	admidio/admidio
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	169
monthly_downloads	97
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 46 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	46
top_contributor_share	0.601

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent

How it's scored

38.1/42	Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
27.2/30	PR acceptance — 509/562 decided PRs merged
8.7/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	509
open_issues	156
closed_issues	1,538
prs_merged_7d	13
prs_decided_7d	14
prs_merged_30d	51
prs_decided_30d	56
issue_closed_ratio	0.908
closed_unmerged_prs	53
first_time_authors_30d	2
first_time_prs_merged_30d	2
first_time_prs_decided_30d	3

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
9.5/25	Owner reach — 20 followers of Admidio
17.7/25	Track record — 5 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	20
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	Admidio
public_repos	5
account_age_days	4,357

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 300 days ago
20/20	Version history — 64 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	admidio/admidio
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	300

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.admidio.org
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	php, admidio, organization, user-management, membership, membership-management, club-management, members, photo-album, lists, event-management, documents-manager
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.admidio.org
docs_site	https://www.admidio.org
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	6.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	114
unassessed_packages	15
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 114 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

76Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.9/40	Legible commit history — 58 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.58
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	930

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
52.4/55	Manageable file sizes — 30/632 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	562,969
source_files_sampled	632
oversized_source_files	30

Key facts

482GitHub stars

46contributors

1,285commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

156open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 172 ⇿

0Stars

172Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 3Patch 79

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10

6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 21:02 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 16

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	bjeavons/zxcvbn-php	`^1.2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	eluceo/ical	`^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	ezyang/htmlpurifier	`^4.14`	composer.json
Packagist	ifsnop/mysqldump-php	`^2.12`	composer.json
Packagist	monolog/monolog	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	ramsey/uuid	`^4.1`	composer.json
Packagist	robthree/twofactorauth	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	smarty/smarty	`^5.0`	composer.json
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf	`^8.75`	composer.json
Packagist	twbs/bootstrap	`5.3.*`	composer.json
Packagist	twbs/bootstrap-icons	`^1.11`	composer.json
Packagist	paragonie/sodium_compat_ext_sodium	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	litesaml/lightsaml	`^4.2`	composer.json
Packagist	league/oauth2-server	`^9.2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	steverhoades/oauth2-openid-connect-server	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	laminas/laminas-diactoros	`^3.5`	composer.json

All dependencies 129

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 113 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	bjeavons/zxcvbn-php	`1.4.2`	direct
Packagist	eluceo/ical	`2.14.0`	direct
Packagist	ezyang/htmlpurifier	`4.19.1`	direct
Packagist	ifsnop/mysqldump-php	`2.13`	direct
Packagist	laminas/laminas-diactoros	`3.8.0`	direct
Packagist	league/oauth2-server	`9.4.1`	direct
Packagist	litesaml/lightsaml	`4.7.1`	direct
Packagist	monolog/monolog	`3.12.0`	direct
Packagist	paragonie/sodium_compat_ext_sodium	`1.0.0`	direct
Packagist	ramsey/uuid	`4.9.4`	direct
Packagist	robthree/twofactorauth	`3.0.3`	direct
Packagist	smarty/smarty	`5.8.4`	direct
Packagist	steverhoades/oauth2-openid-connect-server	`3.0.1`	direct
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf	`8.76.1`	direct
Packagist	twbs/bootstrap	`5.3.8`	direct
Packagist	twbs/bootstrap-icons	`1.13.1`	direct
npm	@swc/core	`1.15.2`	indirect
npm	blueimp-canvas-to-blob	`3`	indirect
npm	blueimp-load-image	`5`	indirect
npm	blueimp-tmpl	`3`	indirect
npm	browserify	`^11.0.1`	indirect
npm	coffee-coverage	`^0.6.3`	indirect
npm	coffee-script	`^1.10.0`	indirect
npm	coffeeify	`^1.1.0`	indirect
npm	coffeetape	`^1.0.1`	indirect
npm	commitplease	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`7`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-blueimp	`2`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-jquery	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`8`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-jsdoc	`36`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prettier	`4`	indirect
npm	exorcist	`^0.4.0`	indirect
npm	faucet	`^0.0.1`	indirect
npm	globals	`16.5.0`	indirect
npm	grunt	`1.6.1`	indirect
npm	grunt-bowercopy	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	grunt-compare-size	`0.4.2`	indirect
npm	grunt-contrib-concat	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-contrib-csslint	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-contrib-requirejs	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-eslint	`26.0.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-git-authors	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-html	`18.0.2`	indirect
npm	istanbul	`^0.3.18`	indirect
npm	jquery	`>=1.12.0 <5.0.0`	indirect
npm	jquery-test-runner	`0.2.8`	indirect
npm	load-grunt-tasks	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	prettier	`2`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	stylelint	`13`	indirect
npm	stylelint-config-prettier	`8`	indirect
npm	stylelint-config-recommended	`5`	indirect
npm	tape	`^4.2.0`	indirect
npm	uglifyify	`^3.0.1`	indirect
npm	watchify	`^3.3.1`	indirect
npm	zuul	`^3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	brick/math	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	defuse/php-encryption	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/instantiator	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	ext-gd	`—`	indirect
Packagist	lcobucci/jwt	`5.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/event	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	litesaml/schemas	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	maennchen/zipstream-php	`3.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	markbaker/complex	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	markbaker/matrix	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.9.0`	indirect
Packagist	paragonie/random_compat	`9.99.100`	indirect
Packagist	paragonie/sodium_compat	`2.5.2`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpmailer/phpmailer	`7.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpoffice/phpspreadsheet	`5.10.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`9.2.32`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`3.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`5.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`9.6.37`	indirect
Packagist	psr/clock	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-server-handler	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-server-middleware	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/simple-cache	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/collection	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	robrichards/xmlseclibs	`3.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`1.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`4.0.10`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`4.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`5.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`4.0.9`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`5.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`1.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`4.0.7`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/resource-operations	`3.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-foundation	`7.4.19`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`6.4.46`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-barcode	`2.16.3`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-color	`3.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-file	`3.9.3`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-encrypt	`2.11.3`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-filter	`2.11.3`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-font	`4.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-graph	`2.18.1`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-image	`3.14.3`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-page	`4.16.4`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-parser	`3.16.1`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-sign	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-unicode	`3.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	tecnickcom/tc-lib-unicode-data	`3.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.3.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 114 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records