Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-23 15:34 UTC

Agrimatics / activemodel-datastore

Ruby on Rails with Google Cloud Firestore in Datastore mode.

RubyMIT★ 52 stars⑂ 16 forkssince Apr 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#rails#google-cloud#google-cloud-datastore#activemodel#google-cloud-firestore

Agrimatics/activemodel-datastore holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (65/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (34/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AgrimaticsOrganization
1 follower4 public repossince Apr 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsactivemodel-datastore0.10.0-150 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

57Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
9.4/18Commit volume — 10 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year10
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year2

Release discipline

72Good
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 15 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~361 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv0.10.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases361
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

40Weak
How it's scored
27.7/60Stars — 52 stars
9.8/25Forks — 16 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks16
stars52
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate
How it's scored
47.6/80Total downloads — 37,747 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesactivemodel-datastore
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads37,747
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.947

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
36.8/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance — 20/27 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues2
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.875
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of Agrimatics
17.1/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginAgrimatics
public_repos4
account_age_days3,822

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesactivemodel-datastore
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrails, google-cloud, google-cloud-datastore, activemodel, google-cloud-firestore
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages153
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 153 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

12Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.3/40Legible commit history — 23 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.23
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/59 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes19,484
source_files_sampled59
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

52GitHub stars
4contributors
10commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
2open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿
0Stars
16Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151522016-072019-092022-12
Major 0Minor 7Patch 5

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-23 15:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
2CI-Tests2 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 163

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 163 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.19indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack—indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel—indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport—indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbetter_errors2.10.1indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.3indirect
RubyGemsbindex0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbyebug13.0.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.40.0indirect
RubyGemscarrierwave—indirect
RubyGemscarrierwave3.1.4indirect
RubyGemscoffee-rails5.0.0indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.12.2indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.7indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdeclarative0.0.20indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.7indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsexcon1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.10.2indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot—indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot6.6.0indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails6.5.1indirect
RubyGemsfaker—indirect
RubyGemsfaker3.8.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-follow_redirects0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsfog-core2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsfog-google1.29.4indirect
RubyGemsfog-json1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfog-xml0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsformatador1.2.3indirect
RubyGemsgapic-common1.3.0indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-compute_v10.154.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-core1.2.5indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-dns_v10.55.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-iamcredentials_v10.28.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-monitoring_v30.85.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-pubsub_v10.71.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-sqladmin_v1beta40.105.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-apis-storage_v10.67.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-core1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-datastore—indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-datastore2.14.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-datastore-v11.8.1indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-env2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-cloud-errors1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-logging-utils0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-protobuf4.36.2indirect
RubyGemsgoogleapis-common-protos1.10.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogleapis-common-protos-types1.23.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogleauth1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsgrpc1.84.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsimage_processing2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.4indirect
RubyGemsirb1.18.0indirect
RubyGemsjquery-rails4.6.1indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemsjwt3.3.0indirect
RubyGemslisten3.10.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.2indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2026.0922indirect
RubyGemsmini_magick4.13.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest—indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.21.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.7indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsos1.1.4indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspstore0.2.1indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemspuma8.0.2indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.7indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrack-timeout0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrake—indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.11.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.11.1indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.13.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrepresentable3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsretriable4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrouge5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop—indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip3.7.0indirect
RubyGemssass-rails6.0.0indirect
RubyGemssassc2.4.0indirect
RubyGemssassc-rails2.1.2indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.49.0indirect
RubyGemssignet0.22.0indirect
RubyGemssprockets4.4.1indirect
RubyGemssprockets-rails3.5.2indirect
RubyGemsssrf_filter1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstilt2.9.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstrailblazer-option0.1.2indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsturbolinks5.2.1indirect
RubyGemsturbolinks-source5.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsuber0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsuglifier4.2.1indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemsweb-console4.3.0indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.11indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 153 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Agrimatics/activemodel-datastore. Read them side by side →

98rails/railsRuby on RailsExceptional98chatwoot/chatwootOpen-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬Exceptional97discourse/discourseA platform for community discussion. Free, open, simple.Exceptional97primer/octiconsA scalable set of icons handcrafted with ❤️ by GitHubExceptional96solidusio/solidus🛒 Solidus, the open-source eCommerce framework for industry trailblazers.Exceptional96launchdarkly/ruby-server-sdkLaunchDarkly Server-side SDK for RubyExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.