Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 02:29 UTC

AlirezaHadjar / react-native-fast-confetti

🏎️ The fastest confetti animation library in react native

TypeScript · PythonMIT★ 571 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

AlirezaHadjar/react-native-fast-confetti holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Security (45/100). It was last updated 17 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Alireza HadjarPersonal account
132 followers48 public repossince Oct 2019

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmreact-native-fast-confetti2.0.2249,9153757 days agoreact-nativeiosandroid

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 17 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
17.2/18Commit volume — 81 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year81
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push17
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 57 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~39.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv2.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release57
mean_days_between_releases39.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.7/60Stars — 571 stars
9.3/25Forks — 14 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars571
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
72/80Monthly downloads — 249,915 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesreact-native-fast-confetti
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads249,915
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.978
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance — 13/14 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs13
open_issues0
closed_issues26
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.3/25Owner reach — 132 followers of AlirezaHadjar
24.3/25Track record — 48 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers132
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginAlirezaHadjar
public_repos48
account_age_days2,509
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 57 days ago
20/20Version history — 37 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesreact-native-fast-confetti
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish57

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js, package.json ("prettier")
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 87 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages12
unassessed_packages44
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 12 resolved dependencies against OSV. 44 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.swmansion.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 92 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.swmansion.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.92
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js, package.json ("prettier")
11/11Static type checking — example/tsconfig.json, kitchen-sink/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsexample/tsconfig.json, kitchen-sink/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/76 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes30,766
source_files_sampled76
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

571GitHub stars
5contributors
81commits, last 12 months
17days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

24681012141422024-102025-082026-07
Major 2Minor 3Patch 12

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 02:28 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities87 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 24
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@expo/metro-runtime~56.0.14kitchen-sink/package.json
npm@expo/ui~56.0.16kitchen-sink/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.2.6kitchen-sink/package.json
npm@shopify/react-native-skia2.6.4kitchen-sink/package.json
npmbabel-plugin-react-compiler1.0.0kitchen-sink/package.json
npmeslint-plugin-react-compiler^19.1.0-rc.2kitchen-sink/package.json
npmexpo^56.0.0kitchen-sink/package.json
npmexpo-blur~56.0.3kitchen-sink/package.json
npmexpo-dev-client~56.0.19kitchen-sink/package.json
npmexpo-linking~56.0.13kitchen-sink/package.json
npmexpo-router~56.2.9kitchen-sink/package.json
npmexpo-status-bar~56.0.4kitchen-sink/package.json
npmexpo-system-ui~56.0.5kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact19.2.3kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.3kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native0.85.3kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-element-dropdown^2.12.4kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-mmkv^4.2.0kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-nitro-modules^0.35.1kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-reanimated4.3.1kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-safe-area-context~5.7.0kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-screens4.25.2kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-web^0.21.0kitchen-sink/package.json
npmreact-native-worklets0.8.3kitchen-sink/package.json
All dependencies 56

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@expo/metro-runtime~56.0.14direct
npm@expo/ui~56.0.16direct
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.2.6direct
npm@shopify/react-native-skia2.6.2direct
npm@shopify/react-native-skia2.6.4direct
npm@shopify/react-native-skia^2.6.9direct
npmbabel-plugin-react-compiler1.0.0direct
npmeslint-plugin-react-compiler^19.1.0-rc.2direct
npmexpo^56.0.0direct
npmexpo-blur~56.0.3direct
npmexpo-dev-client~56.0.19direct
npmexpo-linking~56.0.13direct
npmexpo-router~56.2.9direct
npmexpo-status-bar~56.0.4direct
npmexpo-system-ui~56.0.5direct
npmreact19.2.3direct
npmreact-dom19.2.3direct
npmreact-native0.85.3direct
npmreact-native-element-dropdown^2.12.4direct
npmreact-native-mmkv^4.2.0direct
npmreact-native-nitro-modules^0.35.1direct
npmreact-native-reanimated4.3.1direct
npmreact-native-safe-area-context~5.7.0direct
npmreact-native-screens4.25.2direct
npmreact-native-web^0.21.0direct
npmreact-native-worklets0.8.3direct
npm@babel/core^7.26.0indirect
npm@commitlint/config-conventional^20.5.0indirect
npm@eslint/compat^2.0.3indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc^3.3.5indirect
npm@eslint/js^10.0.1indirect
npm@evilmartians/lefthook^1.5.0indirect
npm@react-native/babel-preset0.85.3indirect
npm@react-native/jest-preset0.85.3indirect
npm@react-navigation/native^7.1.0indirect
npm@react-navigation/native-stack^7.3.0indirect
npm@release-it/conventional-changelog^10.0.6indirect
npm@types/jest^30.0.0indirect
npm@types/react^19.2.0indirect
npmcommitlint^20.5.0indirect
npmdel-cli^7.0.0indirect
npmeslint^9.0.0indirect
npmeslint-config-expo^56.0.0indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier^10.1.8indirect
npmeslint-plugin-ft-flow^3.0.11indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier^5.5.5indirect
npmhermes-eslint^0.34.0indirect
npmjest^30.3.0indirect
npmprettier^3.8.1indirect
npmreact-native-builder-bob^0.40.9indirect
npmreact-native-fast-confetti2.0.2indirect
npmrelease-it^19.2.4indirect
npmtypescript~6.0.3indirect
PyPInumpy—indirect
PyPIopencv-python-headless—indirect
PyPIscipy—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 12 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 44 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.