Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 13:53 UTC

AngeloDotNet / MinimalApi.Identity

A set of libraries to easily integrate and extend authentication in ASP.NET Core projects, using ASP.NET Core Identity.

C#MIT★ 6 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗
#aspnetcore#minimal-api#c-sharp#hacktoberfest#hacktoberfest-accepted#nuget-package#aspnetcoreidentity

AngeloDotNet/MinimalApi.Identity holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (60/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (29/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Angelo PirolaPersonal account
27 followers127 public repossince Apr 2019

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,750 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,750
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year50

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

29At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars6
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.984

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.7/30PR acceptance — 323/326 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs323
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.4/25Owner reach — 27 followers of AngeloDotNet
25/25Track record — 127 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers27
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginAngeloDotNet
public_repos127
account_age_days2,649
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

53Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

38Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 16 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaspnetcore, minimal-api, c-sharp, hacktoberfest, hacktoberfest-accepted, nuget-package, aspnetcoreidentity
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

57Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,819
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

13Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/226 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes33,336
source_files_sampled226
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6GitHub stars
3contributors
2,750commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 13:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetIdentity.Module.API2.5.479IdentityManager.API/IdentityManager.API.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools9.0.17IdentityManager.API/IdentityManager.API.csproj
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetIdentity.Module.API2.5.479direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools9.0.17direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools9.0.2direct
NuGetAWSSDK.S34.0.101.2indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Exceptions.MySQL8.1.3indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Exceptions.MySQL.Pomelo8.1.3indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Exceptions.PostgreSQL8.1.3indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Exceptions.Sqlite8.1.3indirect
NuGetEntityFrameworkCore.Exceptions.SqlServer8.1.3indirect
NuGetFluentValidation.DependencyInjectionExtensions12.1.1indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.AccountManager2.5.142indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.AuthManager2.5.107indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.ClaimsManager2.5.50indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.Core2.5.240indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.EmailManager2.5.110indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.LicenseManager2.5.114indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.ModuleManager2.5.51indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.PolicyManager2.5.130indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.ProfileManager2.5.120indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.RolesManager2.5.78indirect
NuGetIdentity.Module.Shared2.5.135indirect
NuGetMailKit4.10.0indirect
NuGetMailKit4.17.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer8.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer9.0.17indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.17indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Identity.EntityFrameworkCore8.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Identity.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.17indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi8.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.17indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite9.0.17indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer9.0.17indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer9.0.2indirect
NuGetNpgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL9.0.4indirect
NuGetPomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql9.0.0indirect
NuGetScrutor7.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog4.4.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.AspNetCore10.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Enrichers.Environment3.0.1indirect
NuGetSerilog.Enrichers.Thread4.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.1.1indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File7.0.0indirect
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore7.2.0indirect
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore7.3.2indirect
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerGen7.3.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with AngeloDotNet/MinimalApi.Identity. Read them side by side →

100dotnet/aspnetcoreASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.Exceptional98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional97abpframework/abpOpen-source web application framework for ASP.NET Core! Offers an opinionated architecture to build enterprise software solutions with best practices on top of the .NET. Provides the fundamental infrastructure, cross-cutting-concern implementations, startup templates, application modules, UI themes, tooling and documentation.Exceptional99Azure/azure-sdk-for-netThis repository is for active development of the Azure SDK for .NET. For consumers of the SDK we recommend visiting our public developer docs at https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/azure/ or our versioned developer docs at https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk-for-net. Exceptional98PyThaiNLP/pythainlpThai natural language processing in PythonExceptional96ot-container-kit/redis-operatorA golang based redis operator that will make/oversee Redis standalone/cluster/replication/ sentinel mode setup on top of the Kubernetes.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.