Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 11:14 UTC

Ank-KhoaHo / DocToolkit

Convert HTML to DOCX/PDF and edit DOCX/XLSX/PPTX from .NET. Pure managed - no native binaries, no browser, no LibreOffice. Runs on Linux, works offline.

C#MIT★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗

Ank-KhoaHo/DocToolkit holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Khoa HoPersonal account
0 followers5 public repossince Dec 2019

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 927 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year927
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 89 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count89
latest_release_tagv0.57.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases4.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
48.6/80Total downloads — 47,704 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesAnk.DocToolkit, Ank.DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads47,704
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 468/526 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs468
open_issues0
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs58
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of Ank-KhoaHo
17.7/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginAnk-KhoaHo
public_repos5
account_age_days2,493
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 88 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesAnk.DocToolkit, Ank.DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 14 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ank-khoaho.github.io/DocToolkit/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscross-platform, csharp, document-generation, docx, docx-to-pdf, dotnet, excel, html-to-docx, linux, mail-merge, offline, openxml, pdf, powerpoint, pptx, word, xlsx, document-conversion, html-to-pdf, browserless
has_wikino
homepagehttps://ank-khoaho.github.io/DocToolkit/
docs_sitehttps://ank-khoaho.github.io/DocToolkit/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 10 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 86 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — benchmarks/DocToolkit.Benchmarks/DocToolkit.Benchmarks.csproj, samples/Container/Container.csproj, samples/DocxImages/DocxImages.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestsbenchmarks/DocToolkit.Benchmarks/DocToolkit.Benchmarks.csproj, samples/Container/Container.csproj, samples/DocxImages/DocxImages.csproj, samples/DocxTemplating/DocxTemplating.csproj, samples/HtmlConversion/HtmlConversion.csproj, samples/LargeFileStreaming/LargeFileStreaming.csproj, samples/LegacyDoc/LegacyDoc.csproj, samples/MarkdownConversion/MarkdownConversion.csproj, samples/MinimalApi/MinimalApi.csproj, samples/PdfUtilities/PdfUtilities.csproj, samples/Presentations/Presentations.csproj, samples/Protection/Protection.csproj, samples/RazorPdf/RazorPdf.csproj, samples/Signatures/Signatures.csproj, samples/Spreadsheets/Spreadsheets.csproj, samples/Telemetry/Telemetry.csproj, samples/WorkerService/WorkerService.csproj, src/DocToolkit.Docx/DocToolkit.Docx.csproj, src/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection.csproj, src/DocToolkit.Html/DocToolkit.Html.csproj, src/DocToolkit.Pdf/DocToolkit.Pdf.csproj, src/DocToolkit.Pptx/DocToolkit.Pptx.csproj, src/DocToolkit.Primitives/DocToolkit.Primitives.csproj, src/DocToolkit.Xlsx/DocToolkit.Xlsx.csproj, src/DocToolkit/DocToolkit.csproj, tests/AotProbe/AotProbe.csproj, tests/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Tests.csproj, tests/DocToolkit.Tests/DocToolkit.Tests.csproj, tests/TrimProbe/TrimProbe.csproj, tools/CorpusProbe/CorpusProbe.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
53.7/55Manageable file sizes — 8/327 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes183,061
source_files_sampled327
oversized_source_files8
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
1contributors
927commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
89releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 11:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAnk.DocToolkit[0.56.0, )src/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions[8.0.2, )src/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options[8.0.0, )src/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Xml[10.0.13, )src/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection/DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages8.0.0tools/CorpusProbe/CorpusProbe.csproj
All dependencies 15

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAnk.DocToolkit—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options—direct
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Xml—direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePages8.0.0direct
NuGetAnk.DocToolkit.Extensions.DependencyInjection—indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.4indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.11.0indirect
NuGetMono.Cecil0.11.6indirect
NuGetPublicApiGenerator11.5.4indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 10 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.