Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 09:16 UTC

Aptivi / BassBoom

BassBoom! Cross-platform music player for .NET

C#GPL-3.0★ 9 stars⑂ 1 forksince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryDesktop applicationhow this is determined

Aptivi/BassBoom holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AptiviOrganization
9 followers26 public repossince Jul 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetBassBoom.Native1.0.2.3-590 days agobassboombasolianativeruntimecsharplibrary
NuGetBassBoom.Basolia1.0.2.3-590 days agobassboombasolianativeruntimecsharplibrarymusicplayermpegmp3mp2mpgmpg123

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume175 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year175
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases56 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~28.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count56
latest_release_tagv1.0.2.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases28.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars9 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars9
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
56/80Total downloads245,159 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesBassBoom.Native, BassBoom.Basolia
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads245,159
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

38Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach9 followers of Aptivi
18.6/25Track record26 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginAptivi
public_repos26
account_age_days1,490

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history59 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesBassBoom.Native, BassBoom.Basolia
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows22 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://aptivi.gitbook.io/bassboom-manual
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaudio, audio-player, csharp, csharp-lib, csharp-library, dotnet, dotnet-core, libraries, library, mpg123, music, music-player, native, native-libraries, native-library, song, song-lyrics, songs, sound, sound-player
has_wikino
homepagehttps://aptivi.gitbook.io/bassboom-manual
docs_sitehttps://aptivi.gitbook.io/bassboom-manual
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
2/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 11 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://aptivi.gitbook.io/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://aptivi.gitbook.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsprivate/BassBoom.Cli/BassBoom.Cli.csproj, private/BassBoom.QuickPlay/BassBoom.QuickPlay.csproj, private/BassBoom.QuickRadio/BassBoom.QuickRadio.csproj, public/BassBoom.Basolia/BassBoom.Basolia.csproj, public/BassBoom.Native/BassBoom.Native.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/93 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes45,809
source_files_sampled93
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

9GitHub stars
1contributors
175commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
56releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 09:16 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetTerminaux8.7.0private/BassBoom.Cli/BassBoom.Cli.csproj
NuGetThreadify1.0.0private/BassBoom.Cli/BassBoom.Cli.csproj
NuGetTerminaux8.7.0private/BassBoom.QuickPlay/BassBoom.QuickPlay.csproj
NuGetThreadify1.0.0private/BassBoom.QuickPlay/BassBoom.QuickPlay.csproj
NuGetTerminaux8.7.0private/BassBoom.QuickRadio/BassBoom.QuickRadio.csproj
NuGetThreadify1.0.0private/BassBoom.QuickRadio/BassBoom.QuickRadio.csproj
NuGetHtmlAgilityPack1.13.0public/BassBoom.Basolia/BassBoom.Basolia.csproj
NuGetMagico1.7.3.1public/BassBoom.Basolia/BassBoom.Basolia.csproj
NuGetMathNet.Numerics.Signed5.0.0public/BassBoom.Basolia/BassBoom.Basolia.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4public/BassBoom.Basolia/BassBoom.Basolia.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4public/BassBoom.Basolia/BassBoom.Basolia.csproj
NuGetTextify.Offline2.14.2.2public/BassBoom.Basolia/BassBoom.Basolia.csproj
NuGetResourceLab1.0.0public/BassBoom.Native/BassBoom.Native.csproj
NuGetSpecProbe.Loader3.9.1.1public/BassBoom.Native/BassBoom.Native.csproj
NuGetSpecProbe.Software3.9.1.1public/BassBoom.Native/BassBoom.Native.csproj
All dependencies 11

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetHtmlAgilityPack1.13.0direct
NuGetMagico1.7.3.1direct
NuGetMathNet.Numerics.Signed5.0.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetResourceLab1.0.0direct
NuGetSpecProbe.Loader3.9.1.1direct
NuGetSpecProbe.Software3.9.1.1direct
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4direct
NuGetTerminaux8.7.0direct
NuGetTextify.Offline2.14.2.2direct
NuGetThreadify1.0.0direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 11 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.