Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 04:52 UTC

ArxEd-Inc / adk-go

An open-source, code-first Go toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.

GoApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ArxEd-Inc/adk-go holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LitixOrganization
1 follower6 public repossince May 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogoogle.golang.org/adk/v2points to another repo — not scoredv2.4.0-57 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 577 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year577
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 3 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv2.2.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases20.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
51.3/54Bus factor — 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 14% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 29 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor7
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.136
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of ArxEd-Inc
10.8/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginArxEd-Inc
public_repos6
account_age_days848

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

15Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://google.github.io/adk-docs/
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://google.github.io/adk-docs/
docs_sitehttps://google.github.io/adk-docs/
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

96Exceptional · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://google.github.io/adk-docs/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://google.github.io/adk-docs/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes18,637
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod, plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
53.5/55Manageable file sizes — 21/764 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes4,705,426
source_files_sampled764
oversized_source_files21
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
97contributors
577commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
3releases
7bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'google.golang.org/adk/v2' points at a different repository (https://github.com/google/adk-go); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch go package 'google.golang.org/adk/plugin/agentanalytics' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 04:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 46
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.123.0go.mod
Gocloud.google.com/go/aiplatformv1.126.0go.mod
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.66.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/a2aproject/a2a-gov0.3.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/awalterschulze/gographvizv2.0.3+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/glebarez/sqlitev1.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/safehtmlv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/muxv1.8.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.54.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/gcpv1.46.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.46.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlplog/otlploghttpv0.22.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.46.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/logv0.22.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.46.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.46.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.295.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.70.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.2go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2go.mod
Gorsc.io/omapv1.2.0go.mod
Gorsc.io/orderedv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.52.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/a2aproject/a2a-go/v2v2.5.0go.mod
Gocloud.google.com/go/longrunningv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/logv0.22.0go.mod
Gocloud.google.com/go/bigqueryv1.79.0plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
Gogithub.com/apache/arrow-go/v18v18.6.0plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/adk/v2v2.0.0plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.288.0plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.63.0plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260713224248-f5fc221cf8c4plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.1plugin/agentanalytics/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.