Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 09:50 UTC

BSteffaniak / git-sshripped

RustNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

BSteffaniak/git-sshripped holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Braden SteffaniakPersonal account
29 followers135 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iogit_sshripped_cli0.10.085276 days agocligitsshdevelopment-toolscommand-line-utilities
npm@git-sshripped/linux-x640.10.0321206 days ago—
npm@git-sshripped/win32-x640.10.0275206 days ago—
crates.iogit_sshripped_filter0.10.0107276 days agocleanfiltersmudgedevelopment-toolscommand-line-utilities
npm@git-sshripped/darwin-x640.10.0282206 days ago—
npm@git-sshripped/linux-arm640.10.0304206 days ago—
crates.iogit_sshripped_worktree0.10.0104276 days agogitsshworktreedevelopment-toolscommand-line-utilities
npm@git-sshripped/darwin-arm640.10.0283206 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

40Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

66Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 157 commits in the last year
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
commits_last_year157
human_commit_share0.92
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

54Moderate
How it's scored
43.3/80Monthly downloads — 1,761 downloads/month across crates, npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgit_sshripped_cli, @git-sshripped/linux-x64, @git-sshripped/win32-x64, git_sshripped_filter, @git-sshripped/darwin-x64, @git-sshripped/linux-arm64, git_sshripped_worktree, @git-sshripped/darwin-arm64
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, npm
total_downloads2,624
monthly_downloads1,761
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.987

Issue & PR responsiveness

46Weak
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
20.8/30PR acceptance — 9/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs9
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.6/25Owner reach — 29 followers of BSteffaniak
25/25Track record — 135 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginBSteffaniak
public_repos135
account_age_days5,283
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on crates, npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgit_sshripped_cli, @git-sshripped/linux-x64, @git-sshripped/win32-x64, git_sshripped_filter, @git-sshripped/darwin-x64, @git-sshripped/linux-arm64, git_sshripped_worktree, @git-sshripped/darwin-arm64
ecosystemscrates, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/git_sshripped_cli
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/git_sshripped_cli
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
4.5/7.5Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

76Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.3/40Legible commit history — 54 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.587
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,998

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

65Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml, packages/cli/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml, packages/cli/Cargo.toml, packages/cli/models/Cargo.toml, packages/encryption/Cargo.toml, packages/encryption/models/Cargo.toml, packages/filter/Cargo.toml, packages/filter/models/Cargo.toml, packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml, packages/recipient/Cargo.toml, packages/recipient/models/Cargo.toml, packages/repository/Cargo.toml, packages/repository/models/Cargo.toml, packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml, packages/ssh_agent/models/Cargo.toml, packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml, packages/ssh_identity/models/Cargo.toml, packages/sshript-alias/Cargo.toml, packages/sshrypt-alias/Cargo.toml, packages/worktree/Cargo.toml, packages/worktree/models/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.08

Code legibility for models

96Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
51.1/55Manageable file sizes — 2/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes184,783
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
157commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 09:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
6Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 92
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioanyhow—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_cli_models—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_encryption—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_encryption_models—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_filter—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_recipient—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_recipient_models—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_repository—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_repository_models—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_agent—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_identity—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_identity_models—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_worktree—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_worktree_models—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber—packages/cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—packages/encryption/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_encryption_models—packages/encryption/Cargo.toml
crates.iohkdf—packages/encryption/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/encryption/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—packages/encryption/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—packages/encryption/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes-siv—packages/encryption/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—packages/filter/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_encryption—packages/filter/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_encryption_models—packages/filter/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/filter/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_cli_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_encryption—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_encryption_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_filter—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_filter_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_recipient—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_recipient_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_repository—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_repository_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_agent—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_agent_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_identity—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_identity_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_worktree—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_worktree_models—packages/git_sshripped/Cargo.toml
crates.ioage—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_recipient_models—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml—packages/recipient/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—packages/repository/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_repository_models—packages/repository/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_agent_models—packages/repository/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/repository/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—packages/repository/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml—packages/repository/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iochacha20poly1305—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_agent_models—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iohkdf—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iossh-agent-client-rs—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.iossh-key—packages/ssh_agent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioage—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_ssh_identity_models—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iorpassword—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iossh-agent-client-rs—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iossh-key—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iowait-timeout—packages/ssh_identity/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_cli—packages/sshript-alias/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_cli—packages/sshrypt-alias/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—packages/worktree/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—packages/worktree/Cargo.toml
crates.iogit_sshripped_worktree_models—packages/worktree/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprofiling—packages/worktree/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—packages/worktree/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with BSteffaniak/git-sshripped. Read them side by side →

98boa-dev/boaBoa is an embeddable Javascript engine written in Rust.Exceptional97vectordotdev/vectorA high-performance observability data pipeline.Exceptional96apache/iggyApache Iggy: Hyper-Efficient Message Streaming at Laser SpeedExceptional96slint-ui/slintSlint is an open-source declarative GUI toolkit to build native user interfaces for Rust, C++, JavaScript, or Python apps.Exceptional95zeroclaw-labs/zeroclawFast, small, and fully autonomous AI personal assistant infrastructure, any OS, any platform — deploy anywhere, swap anything 🦀Exceptional93yvgude/lean-ctxControl what your AI can see. LeanCTX (Lean Context) is the context intelligence layer for AI agents — one local Rust binary that decides what they read, remembers what they learn, guards what they touch, and proves what they save. 60–90% fewer tokens as the receipt. 76 MCP tools, 30+ agents, local-first.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, npm.