Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-16 04:44 UTC

BiagioFesta / wtransport

Async-friendly WebTransport implementation in Rust

RustApache-2.0★ 693 stars⑂ 53 forkssince May 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#async#client#rust#server#webtransport#http3#network

BiagioFesta/wtransport holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Biagio FestaPersonal account
39 followers53 public repossince Oct 2015@aws

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iowtransport0.7.2119,330254 days agowebtransportasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.iowtransport-proto0.7.2128,268254 days agowebtransportasynchronousnetwork-programming

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18Commit volume — 38 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year38
human_commit_share0.9
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~82.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tag0.7.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases82.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good
How it's scored
46.1/60Stars — 693 stars
14.3/25Forks — 53 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks53
stars693
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

90Excellent
How it's scored
71.9/80Monthly downloads — 247,598 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageswtransport, wtransport-proto
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads1,334,987
monthly_downloads247,598
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.838

Issue & PR responsiveness

65Good
How it's scored
33.7/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
22.1/30PR acceptance — 139/189 decided PRs merged
4.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs139
open_issues24
closed_issues98
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.803
closed_unmerged_prs50
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d3

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.5/25Owner reach — 39 followers of BiagioFesta
24.6/25Track record — 53 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers39
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginBiagioFesta
public_repos53
account_age_days3,964
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 25 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageswtransport, wtransport-proto
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

62Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/wtransport
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsasync, client, rust, server, webtransport, http3, network
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/wtransport
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 45 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, wtransport-proto/Cargo.toml, wtransport/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, wtransport-proto/Cargo.toml, wtransport/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.1

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/33 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes49,636
source_files_sampled33
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

693GitHub stars
25contributors
38commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
24open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 53 ⇿
0Stars
53Forks
22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605222023-062025-012026-08
Major 0Minor 5Patch 17

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-16 04:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests9 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 6/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained7 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iohttlib-huffman0.3.4wtransport-proto/Cargo.toml
crates.iooctets0.3.0wtransport-proto/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.3wtransport-proto/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.4.0wtransport-proto/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.4.0wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iopem3.0.4wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquinn0.11.6wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iorcgen0.14.5wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls0.23.23wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-native-certs0.8.0wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pki-types1.13.2wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.11.0wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iosocket20.6.3wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.3wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iotime0.3.21wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.28.1wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.37wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.4.0wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iowtransport-proto0.7.2wtransport/Cargo.toml
crates.iox509-parser0.18.1wtransport/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 23

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobytes—direct
crates.iohttlib-huffman—direct
crates.iooctets—direct
crates.iopem—direct
crates.ioquinn—direct
crates.iorcgen—direct
crates.iorustls—direct
crates.iorustls-native-certs—direct
crates.iorustls-pki-types—direct
crates.iosha2—direct
crates.iosocket2—direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iotime—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.iotracing—direct
crates.iourl—direct
crates.iowtransport-proto—direct
crates.iox509-parser—direct
crates.ioanyhow—indirect
crates.ioaxum—indirect
crates.iohyper—indirect
crates.iorand—indirect
crates.iotracing-subscriber—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with BiagioFesta/wtransport. Read them side by side →

95actix/actix-netA collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.Exceptional98tokio-rs/tokioA runtime for writing reliable asynchronous applications with Rust. Provides I/O, networking, scheduling, timers, ...Exceptional96microsoft/oxidizerOxidizer is a platform for Rust service development which bridges the gaps in the crate ecosystem to deliver a turn-key solution to enable the efficient creation of high-scale high-availability and high-performance services in Rust.Exceptional96actix/actix-webActix Web is a powerful, pragmatic, and extremely fast web framework for Rust.Exceptional98ZcashFoundation/zebraZcash - Financial Privacy in Rust 🦓Exceptional98svix/svix-webhooksThe open source and enterprise-ready webhooks service 🦀Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.