Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 11:08 UTC

Bluetooth-Devices / xiaomi-ble

Parser for Xiaomi BLE devices

PythonApache-2.0★ 72 stars⑂ 54 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗

Bluetooth-Devices/xiaomi-ble holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (62/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Bluetooth DevicesOrganization
242 followers48 public repossince Jul 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIxiaomi-ble1.21.035,8481260 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 159 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year159
human_commit_share0.55
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.21.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases10.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30/60Stars — 72 stars
14.4/25Forks — 54 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks54
stars72
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.7/80Monthly downloads — 35,848 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesxiaomi-ble
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads35,848
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 40 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 24 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled40
top_contributor_share0.278
How it's scored
31.1/42Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance — 320/333 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs320
open_issues13
closed_issues37
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.74
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.2/25Owner reach — 242 followers of Bluetooth-Devices
20.8/25Track record — 48 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers242
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginBluetooth-Devices
public_repos48
account_age_days1,553

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 126 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesxiaomi-ble
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://xiaomi-ble.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://xiaomi-ble.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 24 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages94
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 94 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.1/40Legible commit history — 31 of 55 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.564
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — src/xiaomi_ble/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 37 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/xiaomi_ble/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.07
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.37
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/xiaomi_ble/py.typed)
46.5/55Manageable file sizes — 2/13 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes254,437
source_files_sampled13
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

72GitHub stars
40contributors
159commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
13open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:xiaomi-ble@1.21.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 54 ⇿
0Stars
54Forks
94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605332022-082024-092026-10
Major 1Minor 46Patch 47

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 11:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 7/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 24 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPISphinx>=5,<10pyproject.toml
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme>=1,<4pyproject.toml
PyPImyst-parser>=0.18,<5.2pyproject.toml
PyPIhome-assistant-bluetooth>=1.9.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsensor-state-data>=2.19.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbluetooth-sensor-state-data>=1.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPIbleak-retry-connector>=2.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbluetooth-data-tools>=0.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIbleak>=0.19.5pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=46.0.7pyproject.toml
PyPIpycryptodomex>=3.19.1pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIorjson>=3.11.6pyproject.toml
All dependencies 94

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 81 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.14.5direct
PyPIbleak3.0.2direct
PyPIbleak-retry-connector4.7.1direct
PyPIbluetooth-data-tools1.29.24direct
PyPIbluetooth-sensor-state-data1.9.0direct
PyPIcryptography50.0.2direct
PyPIhome-assistant-bluetooth2.0.0direct
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0direct
PyPIorjson3.13.0direct
PyPIpycryptodomex3.24.1direct
PyPIsensor-state-data2.20.0direct
PyPIsphinx9.0.4direct
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.2indirect
PyPIaiooui0.1.9indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.13.1indirect
PyPIasync-interrupt1.2.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIblack26.10.1indirect
PyPIbluetooth-adapters2.4.0indirect
PyPIbluetooth-auto-recovery1.6.4indirect
PyPIbtsocket0.3.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.1indirect
PyPIdbus-fast5.0.22indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIflake87.4.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIhabluetooth6.8.3indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimagesize1.5.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort9.0.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIlibrt0.16.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.9.1indirect
PyPImypy2.4.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.15.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes4.0.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyobjc-core12.2indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-cocoa12.2indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-corebluetooth12.2indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-libdispatch12.2indirect
PyPIpyric0.1.6.3indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyupgrade3.22.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPItokenize-rt6.2.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIuart-devices0.1.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIusb-devices0.5.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-runtime3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-devices-bluetooth3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-devices-bluetooth-advertisement3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-devices-bluetooth-genericattributeprofile3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-devices-enumeration3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-devices-radios3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-foundation3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-foundation-collections3.2.1indirect
PyPIwinrt-windows-storage-streams3.2.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.25.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 94 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.