Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-03 17:26 UTC

BridgingIT-GmbH / bITdevKit.Examples.GettingStarted

C#MIT★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryPluginhow this is determined

BridgingIT-GmbH/bITdevKit.Examples.GettingStarted holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BridgingIT GmbHOrganization
17 followers16 public repossince Apr 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Templates10.0.112-40 days agobridgingitdevkitbitdevkittemplatedotnetclean-architecturesolutioncqrsddd

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

51Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 383 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year383
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

9Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

65Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

62Moderate
How it's scored
49.3/80Total downloads — 55,411 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesBridgingIT.DevKit.Templates
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads55,411
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.943

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9/25Owner reach — 17 followers of BridgingIT-GmbH
13.8/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginBridgingIT-GmbH
public_repos16
account_age_days875

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
12/20Version history — 4 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesBridgingIT.DevKit.Templates
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.shouldly.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 85 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.shouldly.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.85
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes13,167

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — bITdevKit.Templates.csproj, src/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.Application/CoreModule.Application.csproj, src/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.Domain/CoreModule.Domain.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbITdevKit.Templates.csproj, src/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.Application/CoreModule.Application.csproj, src/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.Domain/CoreModule.Domain.csproj, src/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.Infrastructure/CoreModule.Infrastructure.csproj, src/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.Presentation/CoreModule.Presentation.csproj, src/Presentation.Web.Server/Presentation.Web.Server.csproj, tests/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.Benchmarks/CoreModule.Benchmarks.csproj, tests/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.IntegrationTests/CoreModule.IntegrationTests.csproj, tests/Modules/CoreModule/CoreModule.UnitTests/CoreModule.UnitTests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/117 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes34,686
source_files_sampled117
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — src/Presentation.Web.Server/wwwroot/openapi.json
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filessrc/Presentation.Web.Server/wwwroot/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

4GitHub stars
2contributors
383commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-03 17:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 44

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 44 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Application.Jobs—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Common.Mapping—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Common.Utilities.CodeGen—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Common.Utilities.Xunit—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Domain—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Domain.CodeGen—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Infrastructure.EntityFramework.SqlServer—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Presentation.Configuration—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Presentation.Serilog—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Presentation.Web—indirect
NuGetBridgingIT.DevKit.Presentation.Web.Jobs—indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector—indirect
NuGetDumpify—indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions.Web—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.ApiDescription.Server—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.DiagnosticsHub.BenchmarkDotNetDiagnosers—indirect
NuGetNetArchTest.eNhancedEdition—indirect
NuGetNSubstitute—indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.Console—indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocol—indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting—indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCore—indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Http—indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Runtime—indirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.SqlClient—indirect
NuGetRazorSlices—indirect
NuGetScalar.AspNetCore—indirect
NuGetSerilog.Enrichers.Environment—indirect
NuGetSerilog.Enrichers.ShortTypeName—indirect
NuGetSerilog.Enrichers.Thread—indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console—indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File—indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Seq—indirect
NuGetShouldly—indirect
NuGetTestcontainers.MsSql—indirect
NuGetxunit—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with BridgingIT-GmbH/bITdevKit.Examples.GettingStarted. Read them side by side →

95AxonFramework/AxonFrameworkFramework for Evolutionary Message-Driven Microservices on the JVMExceptional93Rotorsoft/act-rootEvent-sourcing framework for TypeScript. Three primitives (actions, state, reactions), Zod end to end, no broker required. Postgres, SQLite, or in-memory.Exceptional87Eventuous/eventuousEvent Sourcing library for .NETExcellent87patchlevel/event-sourcingAn event sourcing library, complete with all the essential features, powered by the reliable Doctrine ecosystem and focused on developer experience.Excellent84TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft Supercharge Claude Code with Expert Knowledge A comprehensive framework for AI-assisted development. Install standardized rules, agents, and commands for your projects across multiple technology stacks.Excellent100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.